This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52005XG0708(01)
EU Drugs Action Plan (2005-2008)
EU Drugs Action Plan (2005-2008)
EU Drugs Action Plan (2005-2008)
OJ C 168, 8.7.2005, p. 1–18
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
8.7.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 168/1 |
EU Drugs Action Plan (2005-2008)
(2005/C 168/01)
Introduction
The drugs phenomenon is one of the major concerns of the citizens of Europe and a major threat to the security and health of European society. The EU has up to 2 million problem drug users. The use of drugs, particularly among young people is at historically high levels. The incidence of HIV/AIDS among drug users is causing increasing concern in a series of Member States. The importance of taking a strong stance against drugs trafficking at all levels and the need for a trans-national and coherent approach in combating drugs trafficking has been reflected in the adoption of the Framework Decision laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of drug trafficking (1). Given the global nature of the drugs problem, the EU takes action by utilising a number of political instruments, such as the dialogue on drugs with various regions of the world. Finding a realistic and effective response to this global problem remains a political priority for the European Union.
In December 2004, the European Council endorsed the EU Drug Strategy (2005-2012) which sets the framework, objectives and priorities for two consecutive four-year Action Plans to be brought forward by the Commission. This Strategy is an integral part of the multi-annual programme ‘The Hague Programme’ for strengthening freedom, security and justice in the EU (2).
The Strategy has a number of major aims:
— |
to achieve a high level of health protection, well-being and social cohesion by complementing the Member States' action in preventing and reducing drug use, dependence and drug-related harms to health and society; |
— |
with due regard for the EU's achievements and values in terms of fundamental rights and freedoms, to ensure a high level of security for the general public by taking action against drugs production, cross-border trafficking in drugs and diversion of precursors and by intensifying preventive action against drug-related crime through effective cooperation embedded in a joint approach; |
— |
to strengthen the EU's coordination mechanisms to ensure that action taken at national, regional and international levels is complementary and contributes to the effectiveness of drug policies within the EU and in its relations with other international partners. The latter calls for a more clearly identifiable European position in international fora such as the UN and its specialised agencies, reflecting the EU's dominant position as a donor in this area. |
The Strategy concentrates on the two major dimensions of drugs policy, demand reduction and supply reduction. It also covers a number of cross-cutting themes: international cooperation, research, information and evaluation.
The Action Plan proposed by the Commission and adopted by the Council with some amendments takes account of its Final Evaluation of the EU Drug Strategy and EU Action Plan on Drugs (2000–2004) (3). It targets in particular those areas that the evaluation highlighted as needing further progress. It reiterates a number of essential objectives that were not reached under the previous Action Plan. The Commission has also carried out an initial consultation of civil society on future policy through a dedicated web site. Such consultation will be significantly expanded by the Commission during the course of the Action Plan to include a wide range of representatives of civil society across the EU in a dialogue on how best to deal with drugs issues.
In terms of the ultimate goal it should be clearly understood that the Strategy and Action Plan are not an end in themselves; even if all the objectives they contain are reached we must conclude that they have failed if the result is not a measurable reduction of the drugs problem in our societies. The citizens of Europe expect this. The ultimate aim of the Action Plan is to significantly reduce the prevalence of drug use among the population and to reduce the social harm and health damage caused by the use of and trade in illicit drugs. It aims to provide a framework for a balanced approach to reducing both supply and demand through a number of specific actions.
These have been chosen on the basis of the following criteria:
— |
Actions at EU level must offer clear added value and results must be realistic and measurable. |
— |
Actions must be cost-effective and contribute directly to the achievement of at least one of the goals or priorities set out in the Strategy. |
— |
The number of actions in each field should be targeted and realistic. |
In terms of methodology, the Commission and the Council have designed this Action Plan not as a static list of political objectives, but as a dynamic policy instrument. It follows the structure and the objectives of the Strategy and focuses on concrete results in specific priority areas. Assessment tools and indicators have been introduced for each action. These have been drawn up with the help of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) and Europol, who will help the Commission to keep track of implementation of the Action Plan. On this basis the Commission will publish an annual report and, if necessary, propose adjustments.
Responsibility for implementation of actions and deadlines are clearly indicated in the Plan. To keep implementation on track, targets whose deadlines have passed or are unlikely to be met will be subject to recommendations for their implementation or identification of failure to implement. The Commission will carry out an impact assessment in 2008 in view of proposing a second Action Plan for 2009-2012. A final evaluation of the Strategy and the Action Plans will be carried out by the Commission in 2012. These evaluations will go beyond the strict confines of the Action Plan and will include, on the basis of the work of the EMCDDA and Europol, a general view of the evolution of the drugs situation in Europe.
This Action Plan is ambitious in its objectives but it matches the serious nature of the issues confronting EU citizens. It respects the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and leaves full scope for local, regional, national and transnational actions, while at the same time encouraging all actors to examine how these actions can be mutually supportive and contribute towards achieving the objectives of the EU Drug Strategy.
COORDINATION |
||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable Result: Coordination is key to the establishment and conduct of a successful strategy against drugs. EU-level coordination of drugs policy should take place through the HDG. The HDG should regularly devote attention to external aspects of drugs policy. The national authorities responsible for coordinating drug issues and policies will contribute to the practical implementation of the EU Action Plans within the context of the implementation of national programmes. (Related Strategy priorities 17, 18, 19, 20, 21) |
||||||||||||||||||
Objective |
Action |
Timetable (4) |
Assessment tool/Indicator |
|||||||||||||||
|
Member States, with due regard to their national legislation and administrative structures, to adopt an overall national strategy and one or several action plans on drugs and to ensure that national strategies/action plans are in line with the EU Strategy/Action Plans |
2007 |
MS |
Annual report on national strategies/action plan by the COM, in cooperation with the EMCDDA |
||||||||||||||
|
Member States and the Commission to have a fully operational drugs coordination mechanism and to designate a person, department or body to act as drugs coordinator |
2007 |
MS COM |
MS to report to the COM on existing national coordination structures Annual report on national structures by the COM, in cooperation with the EMCDDA |
||||||||||||||
|
|
2006 |
COM |
COM's Green Paper |
||||||||||||||
|
2007 |
MS |
MS report to the HDG by 2008 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
Council |
COM's Annual Progress Review |
||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
PRES Council |
Report of other Council working groups (or the PRES) to the HDG on drug related issues Results of the HDG discussions on external relations drug issues reported to the relevant working groups and vice-versa |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
Council |
COM Report by 2008 |
||||||||||||||
|
Annual |
Council COM |
Number of new agreements with a specific provision on drugs |
|||||||||||||||
|
The Presidency to provide the opportunity to those responsible for drug coordination to meet to exchange information on national developments, to review the scope for greater cooperation and to focus on the implementation of the EU Action Plan |
Twice a year |
PRES MS COM |
Outcome of meetings |
||||||||||||||
DEMAND REDUCTION |
||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable Result: Measurable reduction of the use of drugs, of dependence and of drug-related health and social risks through the development and improvement of an effective and integrated comprehensive knowledge-based demand reduction system including prevention, early intervention, treatment, harm reduction, rehabilitation and social reintegration measures within the EU Member States. Drug demand reduction measures must take into account the health-related and social problems caused by the use of illegal psychoactive substances and of poly-drug use in association with legal psychoactive substances such as tobacco, alcohol and medicines. (Related to Strategy priorities 23, 24 and 25) |
||||||||||||||||||
Objective |
Action |
Timetable |
Responsible Party |
Assessment tool/Indicator |
||||||||||||||
|
Improve coverage of, access to, quality and evaluation of drug demand reduction programmes and ensure effective dissemination of evaluated best practices More effective use and regular updating of the EMCDDA based EDDRA (Exchange on Drug Demand Reduction Action) and other databases |
2007 |
MS EMCDDA |
Quantitative and qualitative analysis of access to and effectiveness of drug demand measures (EMCDDA treatment demand indicators, EDDRA data analysis). Drug use and risk perception on drugs in the general population and school studies (EMCDDA) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
2007 |
MS |
Number of MS having implemented comprehensive effective programmes on prevention of psychoactive substances in schools; percentage of pupils reached |
||||||||||||||
|
2007 |
MS |
Idem |
|||||||||||||||
|
Develop and improve prevention programmes for selected target groups (e.g. street operators, socially disadvantaged groups, socially excluded children and families at risk, young people in the out of school sector) and specific settings (e.g. drugs and driving, drugs in the work place, drugs in recreational settings) taking into account gender differences. |
2008 |
MS COM |
Rate of availability of prevention programmes for specific target groups (EMCDDA) COM study on the influence of alcohol, drugs and medicines on driving by 2008 Number of Member States having implemented programs in the work place Number, coverage and evaluated effectiveness of prevention projects in recreational settings (EMCDDA) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
MS |
MS report on risk factors related to drug use of the different target groups, especially by young people |
||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS |
MS Report on estimated percentage of professionals who receive specific training by 2008. Age of first drug use/first treatment demand (EMCDDA) |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS |
Number of early intervention programmes implemented (EMCDDA) Estimated population reached (EMCDDA) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
MS |
Treatment demand and availability indicators (EMCDDA) |
||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS |
Treatment demand and availability indicators (EMCDDA) |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS |
Number of people covered by these programmes (EMCDDA) |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS |
Number of national and local campaigns (EMCDDA) |
|||||||||||||||
|
Support development of know-how on drug treatment while continuing to develop and support the exchange of best practices in this field |
2008 |
Council COM |
COM report by 2007 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
MS |
MS Report to the HDG by 2008 |
||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS COM |
COM proposal for a recommendation by 2007 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Implementation of the Council Recommendation on the prevention and reduction of health related harm associated with drug dependence |
Ongoing |
MS |
COM report by 2006 |
||||||||||||||
|
Improve access for addicts to all relevant services and treatment options designed to reduce harm, in due regard with national legislation |
Ongoing |
MS |
Treatment demand and availability indicators (EMCDDA) Analysis of different types of harm and damage reduction services available in the MS (EMCDDA) |
||||||||||||||
|
Ensure the implementation of comprehensive and coordinated national and/or regional programmes on HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C and other blood born diseases. These programmes should be integrated into general social and health care services. |
Ongoing |
MS COM |
Prevalence indicators on HIV, hepatitis C and other infections (EMCDDA) |
||||||||||||||
|
Reduction of drug related deaths to be included as a specific target at all levels with interventions specifically designed for this purpose, such as promoting outreach work, e.g. the work of street units, through well-trained healthcare operators |
Ongoing |
MS |
Drug related deaths indicator (EMCDDA |
||||||||||||||
SUPPLY REDUCTION |
||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable Result: A measurable improvement in the effectiveness, efficiency and knowledge base of law enforcement interventions and actions by the EU and its Member States targeting production, trafficking of drugs, the diversion of precursors, including the diversion of synthetic drug precursors imported into the EU, drug trafficking and the financing of terrorism, money laundering in relation to drug crime. This is to be achieved by focusing on drug-related organised crime, using existing instruments and frameworks, where appropriate opting for regional or thematic cooperation and looking for ways of intensifying preventive action in relation to drug-related crime. (Related Strategy Priorities 27.1, 27.2, 27.3, and 27.4) |
||||||||||||||||||
Objective |
Action |
Timetable |
Responsible Party |
Assessment tool/Indicator |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
MS (8) Europol Eurojust |
Number of operational and intelligence law enforcement projects initiated or completed Quantity and value of precursors and drugs seized Number of criminal groups disrupted Number of illicit laboratories dismantled |
||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS Europol |
Europol reports |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS |
Quantity and value of drugs and precursors seized at the external borders Member States reports on actions taken by services on strengthening controls at external borders |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS |
Member States reports on specific actions taken |
|||||||||||||||
|
2006 |
MS |
Feasibility report including recommendations completed |
|||||||||||||||
|
Implement joint multidisciplinary operational and intelligence gathering projects, share best practice, and increase counter narcotics work. Focus this work on external countries and regions associated with the production of and cross-border trafficking in heroin, cocaine and cannabis into the EU. |
Ongoing |
MS Europol |
Number of operations initiated or completed Quantity and value of heroin cocaine and cannabis seized Number of criminal groups disrupted |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
MS (9) Europol |
Number of operations and intelligence gathering projects initiated or completed Quantity and value of synthetic drugs and synthetic drug precursors seized Number of criminal groups disrupted Number of illicit laboratories dismantled |
||||||||||||||
|
2008 |
MS COM Europol |
Report on the development of a long term solution (10) |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
Council MS COM Europol EMCDDA European Medicines Agency |
Europol/EMCDDA annual report to the Council, European Parliament and the Commission |
|||||||||||||||
|
Implement law enforcement projects such as the European Joint Unit on Precursors. These projects should involve at least 2 Member States |
Ongoing |
MS (11) Europol Eurojust |
Number of law enforcement projects initiated or completed Quantity and value of precursors and drugs seized Number of criminal groups disrupted |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
MS (12) COM |
Number of seizures/stopped shipments |
||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS COM Europol |
Number of seizures/stopped shipments |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS COM |
Number of Memoranda of Understanding/similar arrangements with Industry and/or Number of seminars with Industry Number of notifications and number of investigations resulting from this |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
MS (13) Europol Eurojust |
Number of operational law enforcement projects initiated or completed Seizure of cash and assets seized as a result of drug related investigations Value of assets recovered and confiscated relative to the number of operational law enforcement projects completed |
||||||||||||||
|
2006 |
MS |
Number of MS using FIU-Net |
|||||||||||||||
|
2008 |
MS COM |
COM report on the creation of such Units |
|||||||||||||||
|
2007 |
COM |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2007 |
COM |
Study on best practices in MS which have established and implemented such a fund. |
|||||||||||||||
|
Identify possible links between drug production and trafficking and financing of terrorism and use this information to support or initiate investigations and/or actions |
2007 |
COM Europol MS |
Number of investigations and/or actions initiated or completed |
||||||||||||||
|
|
2007 |
Council Commission |
Commission proposal on the basis of the existing studies to be brought forward by the EMCDDA |
||||||||||||||
|
2007 |
MS Council |
Results presented |
|||||||||||||||
|
2008 |
COM |
Study completed |
|||||||||||||||
|
MS to collect data on drug-related crime and precursor diversion committed with the aid of information technology with a view to developing new methods and best practice to combat these phenomena |
2008 |
MS Council |
Results presented |
||||||||||||||
|
MS and CEPOL, within their respective competences, to include in their annual work (training) programmes more training courses for law enforcement officers specifically relating to combating drug production and trafficking |
2006 |
MS CEPOL |
Additional relevant training included in the respective Annual Work Programmes |
||||||||||||||
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION |
||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable Result: A measurable improvement in effective and more visible coordination between Member States and between them and the Commission in promoting and furthering a balanced approach to the drugs and precursor problem in dealings with international organisations, in international fora and with third countries. This with the aim to reduce the production and drugs supply to Europe and to assist third countries in priority areas in reducing the demand for drugs as an integral part of political and development cooperation. (Related Strategy Priorities 27.5, 30.1, 30.2, and 30.3) |
||||||||||||||||||
Objective |
Action |
Timetable |
Responsible Party |
Assessment tool/Indicator |
||||||||||||||
|
EU positions at international meetings dealing with drugs issues to be prepared in the HDG and other coordination fora. EU coordination meetings to take place during Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND) and other meetings |
Ongoing |
PRES MS COM |
Number of EU positions for relevant international meetings in relation to the number of national positions |
||||||||||||||
|
The Presidency and/or Commission to take the lead role in articulating and promoting the EU's balanced approach |
Ongoing |
PRES MS COM |
Number of EU statements in relation to the number of national statements |
||||||||||||||
|
At the UN, in particular the CND, the Presidency to endeavour to have resolutions brought forward as EU joint resolutions and/or EU co-sponsoring of other resolutions |
Ongoing |
PRES MS COM |
Number of EU joint resolutions and co-sponsored resolutions in relation to the total number of resolutions Convergence Indicator (see doc. 9099/05 CORDROGUE 27) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
2006 |
COM Council PRES MS |
EU proposal for CND 2006 on the basis of a Commission initiative |
||||||||||||||
|
2008 |
COM Council PRES MS |
EU common position on the basis of a Commission initiative |
|||||||||||||||
|
Provide the necessary technical and other assistance to these countries to familiarise them with the EU acquis and to assist them in carrying out the required actions |
2008 |
MS COM EMCDDA Europol |
Number of projects completed; expenditure and percentage of total expenditure on assistance to these countries |
||||||||||||||
|
Conclude agreements with candidate countries |
2008 |
Council COM |
Number of cooperation agreements concluded |
||||||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
MS COM |
Number of drugs provisions implemented |
||||||||||||||
|
2006 |
MS COM |
Number of drugs provisions implemented |
|||||||||||||||
|
Mainstream projects in the drugs field into the EU's cooperation with third countries/regions, especially those affected by drug problems. Particular attention should be paid to providing assistance to and cooperating with:
This assistance and cooperation to be linked to the drugs action plans adopted by the EU with various regions and the drug sections of other action plans with EU partners, where applicable. |
2008 |
MS COM |
Number of projects completed; expenditure and percentage of total expenditure on assistance to these countries/regions |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
MS |
Number of MS liaison officer networks created and/or further developed. Number of meetings held |
||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS |
Training for MS liaison officers provided in MS Annual (training) Work Programmes |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS |
Number of operational law enforcement projects initiated or completed Quantity and value of precursors and drugs seized Number of criminal groups disrupted Number of illicit laboratories dismantled |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS COM |
Number of law enforcement drugs projects completed Expenditure on law enforcement drugs projects |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
Council COM |
Annual report on the use of these mechanisms |
||||||||||||||
|
2006 2007 2008 |
Council COM |
Review reports |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
Council MS COM |
Report on EU activities within these organisations and fora |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
Council MS Commission |
Report on EU activities within the Dublin Group |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
Council Dublin Group |
Number of Dublin Group recommendations implemented (15) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Annual |
Council COM |
Annual report by COM to the Council Update of the database on technical assistance projects in candidate and third countries by COM on the basis of information provided by MS. |
||||||||||||||
|
2008 |
MS COM |
MS and COM reports to the Council |
|||||||||||||||
INFORMATION, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION |
||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable Results:
(Related to Strategy priorities 31, 32) |
||||||||||||||||||
Objective |
Action |
Timetable |
Responsible Party |
Assessment tool/Indicator |
||||||||||||||
|
Full implementation of the five key epidemiological indicators and, as appropriate, fine tuning of these indicators |
2008 |
MS EMCDDA |
Reports from the MS identifying possible problems in implementation |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Annual |
MS |
Reports delivered |
||||||||||||||
|
Annual |
EMCDDA Europol |
Reports delivered |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
2008 |
Council COM |
COM Proposal by 2007 in cooperation with the EMCDDA and Europol |
||||||||||||||
|
2008 |
COM |
Report delivered |
|||||||||||||||
|
Member States and Commission to consider the development of compatible methodologies on direct and indirect expenditure on drug-related measures, with the support of the EMCDDA |
2008 |
MS COM EMCDDA |
Report based on this methodology |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
MS COM |
Identification and inclusion of topics in the Framework Programme and the work programmes as well as national research programmes Amount of successful drug related applications to the Research Programme and number of projects supported at the MS level |
||||||||||||||
|
2007 |
MS with the support of EMCDDA |
Study delivered |
|||||||||||||||
|
Ongoing |
MS COM |
Report on research activities of the Pompidou Group |
|||||||||||||||
|
Encourage research networks, universities and professionals to develop/create networks of excellence for the optimal use of resources and effective dissemination of results |
2007 |
COM |
COM report on the level of networking and acquired funding for these networks |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Ongoing |
COM EMCDDA Europol |
COM Annual review with the support of the EMCDDA and Europol |
||||||||||||||
|
Annual |
COM |
COM Annual review with the support of EMCDDA and Europol |
|||||||||||||||
|
2008 |
COM |
Impact assessment with the support of EMCDDA and Europol |
|||||||||||||||
|
Extent of implementation of recommendations for best practices |
2006 |
Council |
Council report and proposal for recommendations |
(1) OJ L 335 of 11.11.2004; evaluation report to be submitted by the Commission by 12 May 2009 at the latest in the framework of the EU Action Plan on Drugs 2009-2012.
(2) Point 2.8 European Union Strategy on Drugs: ‘The European Council underlines the importance of addressing the drugs problem in a comprehensive, balanced and multidisciplinary approach between the policy of prevention, assistance and rehabilitation of drug dependence, the policy of combating illegal drug trafficking and precursors and money laundering, including the strengthening of international cooperation. The European Strategy on Drugs 2005-2012 will be added to the programme after its adoption by the European council in December 2004’.
(3) COM(2004) 707 final.
(4) Action to be completed by the end of the year indicated at the latest.
(5) Presidency = PRES.
(6) Member States = MS.
(7) Commission = COM.
(8) Relevant data in relation to the assessment tool/indicator to be provided by the lead MS for the project, unless otherwise agreed.
(9) Relevant data in relation to the assessment tool/indicator to be provided by the lead MS for the project, unless otherwise agreed.
(10) MS report in cooperation with the Commission and Europol.
(11) otherwise agreed.
(12) Relevant data in relation to the assessment tool/indicator to be provided by the Member States.
(13) Relevant data in relation to the assessment tool/indicator to be provided by the lead MS for the project, unless otherwise agreed.
(14) Eurojust to cooperate with the candidate countries through nomination of contact points and consideration of cooperation agreements in line with the Council conclusions on Eurojust of 2 December 2004.
(15) The Dublin Group comprises the EU Member States/European Commission and five other countries. The EU Member States/European Commission do not therefore have exclusive ownership of their recommendations.