(1)

On 25 January 2022, the Council adopted Recommendation (EU) 2022/107 (1). Recommendation (EU) 2022/107 follows a ‘person-based’ approach regarding restrictions to free movement linked to the COVID-19 pandemic, by providing that a person who is in the possession of a valid certificate issued on the basis of Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and the Council (2) (‘EU Digital COVID Certificate’) should in principle not be subject to additional restrictions, such as tests or quarantine, regardless of their place of departure in the Union. Persons who are not in possession of a valid EU Digital COVID Certificate could be required to undergo a test prior to or no later than 24 hours after arrival. Recommendation (EU) 2022/107 also adapted the methodology of the traffic light map indicating the epidemiological situation at regional level across the Union established by Council Recommendation (EU) 2020/1475 (3) and published weekly by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.

(2)

On 25 November 2021, when the Commission adopted its proposal (4) for what would become Recommendation (EU) 2022/107, the epidemiological situation concerning the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly different from today. At that point in time, the Delta variant of concern was still prevalent in the Union. More than ten months later, the highly transmissible Omicron variant has – in the form of different sub-variants – become the dominant variant in the Union.

(3)

Omicron is less severe than the previously observed Delta variant, which can be attributed at least partially to the protective effect of vaccination and previous infection (5). As a result, and in combination with higher levels of protection resulting from vaccination and prior infection, pressure on healthcare systems currently remains at manageable levels, even during momentary peaks of infections such as the wave driven by the Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 sub-variants observed during the summer of 2022.

(4)

Any free movement restrictions put in place in response to the COVID-19 pandemic are not to extend beyond what is strictly necessary to safeguard public health. As noted in points 1 and 2 of Recommendation (EU) 2022/107, any such restrictions should, in accordance with the principles of necessity and proportionality, be lifted as soon as the epidemiological situation allows. By August 2022, all Member States had lifted all measures affecting free movement of persons in the Union, including the requirement for travellers to hold an EU Digital COVID Certificate.

(5)

Therefore the approach set out in Recommendation (EU) 2022/107 should be adapted. In particular, that Recommendation should be amended to provide that Member States should in principle not impose any pandemic-related restrictions to the free movement of persons on the grounds of public health. The summer wave of 2022 exemplifies how high virus circulation, following the emergence of a new variant of concern, does not necessarily lead to substantial pressure on national healthcare systems. This highlights the importance of a prudent approach when considering the introduction of restrictions to the free movement of persons based on the number of cases or on the presence of a new variant.

(6)

At the same time, the global COVID-19 pandemic is not over. New waves of infections that could cause the epidemiological situation to worsen, including as a result of the emergence of a new variant of concern or interest, cannot be excluded. It is thus important to continue coordinating preparedness efforts across the Union. As part of these efforts, on 29 June 2022, the European Parliament and the Council extended the period of application of Regulation (EU) 2021/953 on the EU Digital COVID Certificate until 30 June 2023.

(7)

The extension of the EU Digital COVID Certificate framework ensures that Union citizens can continue to benefit from interoperable and mutually accepted certificates of COVID-19 vaccination, test and recovery, in situations where Member States might consider it necessary to temporarily reintroduce certain restrictions to free movement based on public health. At the same time, it is important to underline that Regulation (EU) 2021/953 in no way obliges Member States to require proof of vaccination, test or recovery status in the context of the exercise of free movement.

(8)

Where, in response to a severe worsening of the epidemiological situation, a Member State considers that free movement restrictions are nevertheless necessary to safeguard public health and proportionate, those restrictions should be limited to requiring travellers to be in the possession of a valid EU Digital COVID Certificate. In particular, persons travelling within the Union who are in the possession of a valid EU Digital COVID Certificate should, in such situations, not be required to undergo quarantine, self-isolation or additional testing. To determine whether a situation should be qualified as a severe worsening of the epidemiological situation, Member States should in particular take into account the strain on their healthcare system due to COVID-19, notably in terms of admissions and number of hospital and intensive-care unit inpatients, the severity of circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, as well as the information provided by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control as to the development of the epidemiological situation. In this context, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control publishes relevant data on the development of the epidemiological situation.

(9)

Member States should also assess whether such restrictions are likely to have a positive impact on the epidemiological situation, including a significant decrease in the strain placed on national healthcare systems, given that domestic factors are normally more powerful drivers of the epidemiological situation than cross-border travel. In such situations, domestic non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as mask-wearing, ventilation and physical distancing, rather than travel restrictions, may be effective in slowing down the spread of COVID-19, if implemented early and comprehensively and sufficiently put into practice by society (6).

(10)

When it comes to the possible requirement to be in the possession of a valid EU Digital COVID Certificate, the amendments to Regulation (EU) 2021/953 introduced by Regulation (EU) 2022/1034 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7) should be reflected in Recommendation (EU) 2022/107. First, it should be mentioned that EU Digital COVID Certificates issued to persons participating in clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines may be accepted by other Member States in order to waive restrictions to free movement. To facilitate the exercise of free movement of Union citizens who have received a COVID-19 vaccine that has completed the WHO emergency use listing procedure, Member States are also recommended to accept EU Digital COVID Certificates issued following the administration of such vaccines. In addition, test and recovery certificates can now be issued on the basis of laboratory-based antigenic assays.

(11)

Given their specific situation or essential function, certain categories of travellers should be exempted from a possible requirement to be in the possession of an EU Digital COVID Certificate, when exercising this essential function. In light of the current security situation, it is important that this list expressly includes diplomats, staff of international organisations, people invited by international organisations, military personnel, humanitarian aid workers and civil protection personnel. The list should also include persons covered by Article 2 of Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 (8) and be consistent with Council Recommendation (EU) 2022/2548 (9). At the same time, this should not prevent Member States from offering vaccination and testing to these categories of persons.

(12)

To be able to react quickly to newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, the ‘emergency brake’, that is to say, the possibility to take other measures in addition to the EU Digital COVID Certificate, should be maintained. This ‘emergency brake’ procedure could be used in response to the emergence of a new SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern or interest, with the aim of slowing down its spread by means of travel restrictions, buying time to mobilise surge hospital capacity, and triggering vaccine development. It could also be used in situations where the epidemiological situation worsens rapidly and severely in a way that suggests the emergence of a new SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern or interest.

(13)

Where a Member State introduces a requirement to present a valid EU Digital COVID Certificate, or where it takes additional measures in accordance with the emergency brake procedure, it should swiftly inform the Commission and other Member States accordingly through the Integrated Political Crisis Response (‘IPCR’) network, and provide information as to the reasons, expected impact, entry into force and duration of any such travel restrictions. This should include information as to why the introduction of such travel restrictions complies with the principles of necessity and proportionality, for example because of the particular geographical situation of the Member State concerned or the particular vulnerabilities of its national healthcare system. This should also serve to ensure consistency with the rules on travel from third countries. To ensure effective coordination at Union level, the IPCR network should swiftly convene to review the situation if a Member State triggers the emergency brake.

(14)

To obtain timely, relevant and representative information on the emergence and circulation of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern or interest, Member States should assess the circulation of different SARS-CoV-2 variants in the community by selecting representative samples for sequencing, carry out genetic characterisation and report variant typing results in line with the sequencing guidance published by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (10).

(15)

It also remains important to ensure that information on any new measures is publicly available as early as possible. Indeed, as noted by the Commission in its Communication of 2 September 2022 (11), Member States should do their utmost to ensure that potential travellers are well-informed about possible travel restrictions they may face when entering another Member State. The Re-Open EU web platform remains a key point of reference for anyone travelling in the Union.

(16)

It is appropriate to discontinue the traffic light map published by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control since the adoption of Recommendation (EU) 2020/1475 in October 2020. In view of epidemiological developments, the methodology of the map was adapted multiple times. Its latest iteration, using the 14-day notification rate weighted by vaccine uptake, was based on experiences with the Delta variant. However, the high infection numbers caused by the Omicron variant resulted in large parts of the map being marked in ‘dark red’, despite all Member States having lifted their free movement restrictions. In addition, as Member States adapted their testing regimes, multiple regions appeared in ‘dark grey’ due to reported testing rates having fallen below the threshold established by Recommendation (EU) 2022/107. This shift of testing strategies towards representative samples of the population will not change in the foreseeable future. As a result, the traffic light map had become an inadequate depiction of the epidemiological situation in the Union. Following discussions with the Member States and the Commission, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control already temporarily suspended the publication of the map in July 2022.

(17)

Consequently, the references to specific additional measures for persons travelling from ‘dark red’ areas should be removed from Recommendation (EU) 2022/107 together with the traffic light map.

(18)

The mandatory submission of passenger locator forms (‘PLF’) in the context of intra-EU travel for contact-tracing purposes constitutes an additional requirement for the exercise of free movement. Such a requirement is thus justified only if necessary and proportionate. In particular, Member States should not require travellers using private transport, be it cars, bikes or on foot, to submit PLF. This is because their exposure is necessarily less intensive than in the case of public transport and because they will typically know the identities of their fellow travelling companions.

(19)

At the same time, should Member States wish to activate contact-tracing of cross-border passengers, common tools, such as the EU digital Passenger Locator Form and Early Warning and Response System selective exchange module, are available to exchange passenger data to enhance their contact-tracing capabilities while limiting burdens on passengers and transport operators. To avoid the need for the submission of PLF, Member States could, where possible under national law and in compliance with data protection rules, also consider using existing passenger data for the purposes of contact-tracing.

(20)

The Commission, with the support of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, should continue its regular review of Recommendation (EU) 2022/107, and transmit its findings to the Council for its consideration, together with a proposal to amend that Recommendation, where necessary,