(1)

Pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, harmonised standards provided for in Article 17 are to fulfil the requirements of the harmonised system set out in or by means of this Regulation.

(2)

In January 2011, the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) adopted the harmonised standard EN 13341:2005 + A1: 2011 ‘Static thermoplastic tanks for above ground storage of domestic heating oils, kerosene and diesel fuels — Blow moulded and rotationally moulded polyethylene tanks and rotationally moulded tanks made of anionically polymerized polyamide 6 — Requirements and test methods’. The reference of the standard was subsequently published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). The reference of the standard was republished several times with the latest publication in 2017 (3).

(3)

On 21 August 2015 Germany launched a formal objection procedure in respect of the harmonised standard EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011. The formal objection was based on the lack of harmonised methods in that standard for ensuring the mechanical resistance, load-bearing capacity, stability and resistance to fragmentation or crushing of the products in question when installed in earthquake or flood areas. Consequently, Germany demanded the restriction of the reference of the standard published in the Official Journal of the European Union by excluding earthquake or flood areas from its scope, or alternatively the withdrawal of that reference of the standard altogether.

(4)

According to Germany, that standard does not contain any stipulations for ascertaining the performance of the construction products in question when they are installed in areas where a risk of earthquakes or flooding exists. The necessary assessment methods for those purposes are completely missing, when it comes to design, support construction or anchoring the tanks. Moreover, the extent to which impacts resulting from loads from earthquakes or floods can be absorbed by them, cannot be assessed either.

(5)

Germany considered these shortcomings to constitute a violation of Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, as the standard at hand did not entirely satisfy the requirements set out in the relevant mandate as provided in Article 18 of that Regulation.

(6)

When assessing the admissibility of the claims brought forward, it should be noted that the additional alleged needs brought forward by Germany relate to the installation and the subsequent use of the products in question in areas where a risk of earthquakes or flooding exists.

(7)

However, according to Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, harmonised standards are to provide the methods and the criteria for assessing the performance of the products covered by them. The purpose of the harmonised system set out in or by means of that Regulation is to lay down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products, not to provide rules for their installation or their use.

(8)

The rights to bring forward formal objections in accordance with Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 cannot, however, be extended to claims focusing on other matters than the content of the standards in question. Such claims are therefore to be considered inadmissible in the context of formal objections.

(9)

Therefore, and since the first demand of Germany, to restrict the reference of the standard by excluding earthquake or flood areas from its scope of application, focuses on other matters than the content of the standard in question, it should be considered inadmissible.

(10)

The general alternative demand of Germany, to withdraw the reference of the standard altogether, is mainly based on the inadequacy of the standard as it stands, especially when it comes to the installation and the subsequent use of the products in question in earthquake or flood areas.

(11)

However, Member States remain fully entitled to regulate the specific conditions for the installation or the use of construction products, provided that such specific conditions do not entail requirements for the assessment of the performance of the products in breach of the harmonised system. Member States are thus able to prohibit or limit the installation or use of the products in question in earthquake or flood areas, as currently is the case in Germany.

(12)

On the basis of the contents of EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 as well as the information submitted by Germany, by CEN and by industry, and after consulting the committees established by Article 64 of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 and by Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4), it is widely agreed that the reference of that standard should be maintained in the Official Journal of the European Union.

(13)

The alleged incompleteness of that standard should thus not be considered a sufficient reason for complete withdrawal of the reference of the standard EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 from the Official Journal of the European Union.

(14)

The reference of EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 should therefore be maintained in the Official Journal of the European Union,