This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 02024R1348-20260227
Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 establishing a common procedure for international protection in the Union and repealing Directive 2013/32/EU
Consolidated text: Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 establishing a common procedure for international protection in the Union and repealing Directive 2013/32/EU
Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 establishing a common procedure for international protection in the Union and repealing Directive 2013/32/EU
02024R1348 — EN — 27.02.2026 — 001.001
This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document
|
REGULATION (EU) 2024/1348 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 14 May 2024 (OJ L 1348 22.5.2024, p. 1) |
Amended by:
|
|
|
Official Journal |
||
|
No |
page |
date |
||
|
REGULATION (EU) 2026/463 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 24 February 2026 |
L 463 |
1 |
26.2.2026 |
|
|
REGULATION (EU) 2026/464 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 24 February 2026 |
L 464 |
1 |
26.2.2026 |
|
Corrected by:
REGULATION (EU) 2024/1348 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 14 May 2024
establishing a common procedure for international protection in the Union and repealing Directive 2013/32/EU
CHAPTER I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1
Subject matter
This Regulation establishes a common procedure for granting and withdrawing international protection pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/1347.
Article 2
Scope
Article 3
Definitions
For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply:
‘refugee’ means a third-country national who, owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership of a particular social group, is outside the country of nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of that country, or a stateless person who, being outside of the country of former habitual residence for the same reasons as mentioned, is unable or, owing to such fear, unwilling to return to it, and to whom Article 12 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347 does not apply;
‘person eligible for subsidiary protection’ means a third-country national or a stateless person who does not qualify as a refugee but in respect of whom substantial grounds have been shown for believing that that person, if returned to his or her country of origin or, in the case of a stateless person, to his or her country of former habitual residence, would face a real risk of suffering serious harm as defined in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347, and to whom Article 17(1) and (2) of that Regulation does not apply, and is unable or, owing to such risk, unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of that country;
‘refugee status’ means the recognition by a Member State of a third-country national or a stateless person as a refugee in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1347;
‘subsidiary protection status’ means the recognition by a Member State of a third-country national or a stateless person as a person eligible for subsidiary protection in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1347;
‘international protection’ means refugee status or subsidiary protection status;
‘minor’ means a third-country national or stateless person below the age of 18 years;
‘unaccompanied minor’ means a minor who arrives on the territory of the Member States unaccompanied by an adult responsible for him or her, whether by law or practice of the Member State concerned, and for as long as that minor is not effectively taken into the care of such an adult, including a minor who is left unaccompanied after he or she has entered the territory of the Member States;
‘final decision’ means a decision on whether or not a third-country national or stateless person is granted refugee status or subsidiary protection status pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/1347, including a decision rejecting the application as inadmissible or a decision rejecting an application as implicitly or explicitly withdrawn, which is no longer subject to a remedy under the framework of Chapter V of this Regulation or has become final in accordance with national law, irrespective of whether the applicant has the right to remain in accordance with this Regulation;
‘examination of an application for international protection’ means an examination of the admissibility or the merits of an application for international protection in accordance with this Regulation and Regulation (EU) 2024/1347;
‘biometric data’ means biometric data as defined in Article 2, point (s), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1358;
‘adequate capacity’ means the capacity required at any given moment to carry out the asylum border procedure, and the return border procedure established pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/1349 or, where applicable, an equivalent return border procedure established under national law;
‘application for international protection’ or ‘application’ means a request for protection from a Member State made by a third-country national or a stateless person who can be understood to be seeking refugee status or subsidiary protection status;
‘applicant’ means a third-country national or a stateless person who has made an application for international protection in respect of which a final decision has not yet been taken;
‘applicant in need of special procedural guarantees’ means an applicant whose ability to benefit from the rights and comply with the obligations provided for in this Regulation is limited due to individual circumstances, such as specific vulnerabilities;
‘stateless person’ means a person who is not considered to be a national by any State under the operation of its law;
‘determining authority’ means any quasi-judicial or administrative body in a Member State responsible for examining applications for international protection and competent to take decisions under the administrative procedure;
‘withdrawal of international protection’ means a decision by a determining authority or a competent court or tribunal to revoke or end, including by refusing to renew, international protection, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1347;
‘remain in the Member State’ means to remain on the territory, including at the border or in transit zones, of the Member State in which the application for international protection has been made or is being examined;
‘subsequent application’ means a further application for international protection made in any Member State after a final decision has been taken on a previous application, including cases in which the application has been rejected as explicitly or implicitly withdrawn;
‘Member State responsible’ means the Member State responsible for the examination of an application in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1351.
Article 4
Competent authorities
Each Member State shall designate in accordance with national law a determining authority to carry out the tasks conferred on it pursuant to this Regulation and Regulation (EU) 2024/1347, in particular:
receiving and examining applications for international protection;
taking decisions on applications for international protection;
taking decisions on the withdrawal of international protection.
The determining authority shall be the only authority, during the administrative procedure, with the power to decide on the admissibility and the merits of an application for international protection.
Article 5
Assistance to competent authorities
Without prejudice to Article 4(7) and (8), at the request of the Member State, competent authorities identified under Article 4 may, for the purpose of receiving and registering applications for international protection and of facilitating the examination of applications, including with regard to the personal interview, be assisted by:
experts deployed by the European Union Agency for Asylum (the ‘Asylum Agency’) in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2021/2303; and
the competent authorities of another Member State that have been entrusted by that Member State with the task of receiving, registering or examining applications for international protection.
Competent authorities designated pursuant to Article 4 may assist the authorities of another Member State only for the tasks with which they have been entrusted by their Member State.
The competence to decide on individual applications for international protection shall remain solely with the determining authority of the Member State responsible.
Article 6
The role of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Member States shall allow the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to:
have access to applicants, including those in reception centres, in detention, at the border and in transit zones;
have access to information on individual applications for international protection, on the course of the procedure and on the decisions taken, subject to the consent of the applicant;
present its views, in the exercise of its supervisory responsibilities under Article 35 of the Convention of 28 July 1951 Relating to the Status of Refugees, as supplemented by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 (the ‘Geneva Convention’), to any competent authorities regarding individual applications for international protection at any stage of the procedure.
Article 7
Confidentiality principle
Throughout the procedure for international protection and after a final decision on the application has been taken, the authorities shall not:
disclose information regarding the individual application for international protection or the fact that an application has been made, to the alleged actors of persecution or serious harm;
obtain any information from the alleged actors of persecution or serious harm in a manner that would result in such actors being informed of the fact that an application has been made by the applicant in question.
CHAPTER II
BASIC PRINCIPLES AND GUARANTEES
SECTION I
Rights and obligations of applicants
Article 8
General guarantees for applicants
The determining authority or, where applicable, other competent authorities or organisations tasked by Member States for that purpose shall inform applicants, in a language which they understand or are reasonably supposed to understand, of the following:
the right to lodge an individual application;
the time limits and stages of the procedure to be followed;
their rights and obligations during the procedure, including those under Regulation (EU) 2024/1351, and the consequences of not complying with those obligations, in particular as regards the explicit or implicit withdrawal of an application;
the right to free legal counselling for the lodging of the individual application and to legal assistance and representation at all stages of the procedure pursuant to Section III of this Chapter and in accordance with Articles 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19;
the means by which they can fulfil the obligation to submit the elements as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347;
the decision of the determining authority in accordance with Article 36.
All the information referred to in this paragraph shall be provided as soon as possible to enable applicants to exercise the rights guaranteed in this Regulation and to enable them to adequately comply with the obligations set out in Article 9. The information referred to in the first subparagraph, points (a) to (e), of this paragraph shall be provided to the applicant at the latest when the application for international protection is registered. That information shall be provided by means of the leaflet referred to in paragraph 7, either physically or electronically, and, if necessary, orally. Information shall be provided to minors in a child-friendly manner and with the involvement of the representative or the person referred to in Article 23(2), point (a), of this Regulation.
The applicant shall be given the opportunity to confirm that he or she has received the information. Such confirmation shall be documented in the applicant’s file. If the applicant refuses to confirm that he or she has received the information, a note of that fact shall be entered in his or her file.
Article 9
Obligations of applicants
The applicant shall fully cooperate with the competent authorities referred to in Article 4 in matters covered by this Regulation, in particular by:
providing the data referred to in Article 27(1), points (a),(b) and (d);
providing an explanation where he or she is not in possession of an identity or travel document;
providing information on any changes as regards his or her place of residence, address, telephone number or email address;
providing biometric data;
lodging his or her application in accordance with Article 28 and remaining available throughout the procedure;
handing over as soon as possible documents in his or her possession relevant to the examination of the application;
attending the personal interview, without prejudice to Article 13;
remaining on the territory of the Member State where he or she is required to be present, in accordance with Article 17(4) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351.
Where the competent authorities decide to retain any document as referred to in point (f) of the first subparagraph, they shall ensure that the applicant immediately receives copies of the originals. In the event of a transfer pursuant to Article 46 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351, competent authorities shall hand back such documents to the applicant at the time of the transfer.
Member States shall establish in national law the method of communication and the moment that the communication is considered to have been received by the applicant.
Article 10
Right to remain during the administrative procedure
Member States may provide for an exception to the applicant’s right to remain on their territory during the administrative procedure where that applicant:
makes a subsequent application in accordance with Article 55 and the conditions laid down in Article 56 have been fulfilled;
is or will be extradited, surrendered or transferred to another Member State, a third country, the International Criminal Court or another international court or tribunal for the purpose of conducting a criminal prosecution or for the execution of a custodial sentence or a detention order;
is a danger to public order or national security, without prejudice to Article 12 and 17 of the Regulation (EU) 2024/1347, provided that applying such an exception does not result in the applicant being removed to a third country in violation of the principle of non-refoulement.
SECTION II
Personal interviews
Article 11
Admissibility interview
Article 12
Substantive interview
Article 13
Requirements for personal interviews
The presence of a cultural mediator may be provided during the personal interviews.
Member States shall give preference to interpreters and cultural mediators that have received training, such as training referred to in Article 8(4), point (m), of Regulation (EU) 2021/2303.
Member States shall ensure that interpreters and cultural mediators are made aware of the key concepts and terminology relevant to the assessment of applications for international protection, for example through a standard leaflet or a guide. Communication shall take place in the language preferred by the applicant unless there is another language which he or she understands and in which he or she is able to communicate clearly.
Where there is a disproportionate number of third-country nationals or stateless persons who make an application within the same period of time, making it unfeasible to conduct timely personal interviews of each applicant, the determining authority may be assisted temporarily by the staff of other authorities of that Member State who shall receive in advance the relevant training which shall include the elements listed in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2303 to conduct such interviews or by the Asylum Agency in accordance with Article 5.
The person conducting the interview shall:
be competent to take account of the personal and general circumstances surrounding the application, including the situation prevailing in the applicant’s country of origin, and the applicant’s cultural origin, age, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, vulnerability and special procedural needs;
not wear a military or law enforcement uniform.
Staff interviewing applicants, including experts deployed by the Asylum Agency, shall have:
acquired general knowledge of factors which could adversely affect the applicant’s ability to be interviewed, such as indications that the person may have been tortured in the past or a victim of trafficking in human beings;
received, in advance, training that includes relevant elements from those listed in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2021/2303.
In such a case, the determining authority shall ensure the necessary arrangements for the appropriate facilities, procedural and technical standards, legal assistance and interpretation taking into account guidance from the Asylum Agency.
The admissibility interview or the substantive interview, as applicable, may be omitted where:
the determining authority is able to take a positive decision with regard to the refugee status or the subsidiary protection status on the basis of the evidence available, provided that the subsidiary protection status offers the same rights and benefits as refugee status under Union and national law;
the determining authority considers that the application is not inadmissible on the basis of the evidence available;
the determining authority is of the opinion that the applicant is unfit or unable to be interviewed owing to enduring circumstances beyond his or her control;
in the case of a subsequent application, the preliminary examination referred to in Article 55(4) is carried out on the basis of a written statement;
the determining authority considers the application inadmissible pursuant to Article 38(1), point (c).
The omission of a personal interview pursuant to point (c) of the first subparagraph shall not adversely affect the decision of the determining authority. Where the personal interview is omitted pursuant to that point, the determining authority shall give the applicant an effective opportunity to submit further information in writing.
When in doubt as to the fitness or ability of the applicant to be interviewed, the determining authority shall consult a medical professional to establish whether the applicant is temporarily unfit or unable to be interviewed or whether his or her situation is of an enduring nature. Where, following consultation of that medical professional, it is clear that the condition making the applicant unfit or unable to be interviewed is of a temporary nature, the determining authority shall postpone the personal interview until such time as the applicant is fit or able to be interviewed.
Where the applicant is unable to attend the personal interview owing to specific circumstances beyond his or her control, the determining authority shall reschedule the personal interview
The absence of the legal adviser shall not prevent the determining authority from conducting the interview.
Member States may stipulate in national law that, where a legal adviser participates in the personal interview, the legal adviser may only intervene at the end of the personal interview.
Article 14
Report and recording of personal interviews
The applicant does not have to be requested to make comments or to provide clarifications on the report or the transcript of the interview, nor to confirm that the content of the report or the transcript of the interview correctly reflects the interview where:
under national law, the recording or a transcript thereof may be admitted as evidence in the appeal procedure, or
it is clear to the determining authority that the applicant will be granted refugee status or subsidiary protection status provided that the subsidiary protection status offers the same rights and benefits as refugee status under Union and national law.
Access to the recording shall also be provided in the appeal procedure.
SECTION III
Provision of legal counselling and legal assistance and representation
Article 15
Right to legal counselling and legal assistance and representation
The applicant shall be informed as soon as possible and at the latest when registering the application in accordance with Article 27 of his or her right to request free legal counselling or free legal assistance and representation.
Article 16
Free legal counselling in the administrative procedure
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, effective access to free legal counselling may be assured by entrusting a person with the provision of legal counselling in the administrative stage of the procedure to several applicants at the same time.
For the purposes of the administrative procedure, free legal counselling shall include the provision of:
guidance on and an explanation of the administrative procedure including information on rights and obligations during that procedure;
assistance on the lodging of the application and guidance on:
the different procedures under which the application may be examined and the reasons for the application of those procedures;
the rules related to the admissibility of an application;
legal issues arising in the course of the procedure, including information on how to challenge a decision rejecting an application in accordance with Articles 67, 68 and 69.
Without prejudice to paragraph 1, the provision of free legal counselling in the administrative procedure may be excluded where:
the application is a first subsequent application considered to have been lodged merely in order to delay or frustrate the enforcement of a return decision which would result in the applicant’s imminent removal from the Member State;
the application is a second or further subsequent application;
the applicant is already assisted and represented by a legal adviser.
Article 17
Free legal assistance and representation in the appeal procedure
The provision of free legal assistance and representation in the appeal procedure may be excluded by the Member States where:
the applicant, who shall disclose his or her financial situation, is considered to have sufficient resources to afford legal assistance and representation at his or her own cost;
it is considered that the appeal has no tangible prospect of success or is abusive;
the appeal or review is at a second level of appeal or higher as provided for under national law, including re-hearings or reviews of appeal;
the applicant is already assisted or represented by a legal adviser.
Article 18
Scope of legal counselling and legal assistance and representation
Access to the information or to the sources in the applicant’s file may be denied in accordance with national law where the disclosure of information or sources would jeopardise national security, the security of the organisations or persons providing the information or the security of the persons to whom the information relates or where the investigative interests relating to the examination of applications for international protection by the competent authorities of the Member States or the international relations of the Member States would be compromised or where the information or sources are classified under national law. In those cases, the determining authority shall:
make access to such information or sources available to the courts or tribunals in the appeal procedure; and
ensure that the applicant’s right of defence is respected.
As regards point (b) of the first subparagraph, Member States shall grant access to information or sources to a legal adviser who legally represents the applicant and who has undergone a security check, in so far as the information is relevant for examining the application or for taking a decision to withdraw international protection.
Article 19
Conditions for the provision of free legal counselling, assistance and representation
SECTION IV
Special guarantees
Article 20
Assessment of the need for special procedural guarantees
The assessment referred to in paragraph 1 shall be concluded as soon as possible and, in any event, within 30 days. It shall be reviewed in the event of any relevant changes in the applicant's circumstances or where the need for special procedural guarantees becomes apparent after the assessment has been completed.
The advice provided pursuant to the first subparagraph shall be taken into account by the determining authority when deciding on the type of special procedural guarantees which can be provided to the applicant.
Where applicable and without prejudice to the medical examination, the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 may be integrated with the medical examinations referred to in Articles 24 and 25.
Article 21
Applicants in need of special procedural guarantees
Article 22
Guarantees for minors
The personal interview of a minor shall be conducted by a person who has the necessary knowledge of the rights and special needs of minors. It shall be conducted in a child-sensitive and context-appropriate manner, taking into consideration the age and maturity of the child.
Article 23
Special guarantees for unaccompanied minors
Where an application is made by a person who claims to be a minor, or in relation to whom there are objective grounds to believe that he or she is a minor, who is unaccompanied, the competent authorities shall:
designate as soon as possible and in any case in a timely manner for the purposes of paragraph 6 and, where applicable, paragraph 7, a person with the necessary skills and expertise to provisionally assist the minor in order to safeguard his or her best interests and general well-being which enables the minor to benefit from the rights under this Regulation and, where applicable, act as a representative until a representative has been appointed;
appoint a representative as soon as possible and no later than 15 working days from the date on which the application is made.
The representative and the person referred to in the first subparagraph, point (a), of this paragraph may be the same as that provided for in Article 27 of Directive (EU) 2024/1346. He or she shall meet with the unaccompanied minor and take into account the minor’s own views about his or her needs in accordance with the age and maturity of the minor.
Where the competent authority has concluded that an applicant who claims to be a minor is without any doubt above the age of 18 years, it need not appoint a representative in accordance with this paragraph.
The duties of the representative or the person referred to in the first subparagraph, point (a), of this paragraph shall cease where the competent authorities, following the age assessment referred to in Article 25(1), do not assume that the applicant is a minor or consider that the applicant is not a minor or where the applicant is no longer an unaccompanied minor.
The competent authority shall immediately inform:
the unaccompanied minor, in a child-friendly manner and in a language he or she can understand, of the designation of the person referred to in paragraph 2, first subparagraph, point (a), and of his or her representative and about how to lodge a complaint against the person referred to in paragraph 2, first subparagraph, point (a) or (b), in confidence and safety;
the determining authority and the competent authority for registering the application, where applicable, that a representative has been appointed for the unaccompanied minor; and
the person referred to in paragraph 2, first subparagraph, point (a), and the representative of the relevant facts, procedural steps and time limits pertaining to the application of the unaccompanied minor.
The representative and the person referred to in paragraph 2, first subparagraph, point (a), shall have access to the content of the relevant documents in the minor’s file including the specific information material for unaccompanied minors.
The person referred to in paragraph 2, first subparagraph, point (a), shall meet with the unaccompanied minor and carry out, inter alia, the following tasks, where appropriate together with the legal adviser:
provide the unaccompanied minor with relevant information in relation to the procedures provided for in this Regulation;
where applicable, assist the unaccompanied minor in relation to the age-assessment procedure referred to in Article 25;
where applicable, provide the unaccompanied minor with the relevant information and assist him or her in relation to the procedures provided for in Regulations (EU) 2024/1351 and (EU) 2024/1358.
The representative shall meet with the unaccompanied minor and shall carry out, inter alia, the following tasks, where appropriate together with the legal adviser:
where applicable, provide the unaccompanied minor with relevant information in relation to the procedures provided for in this Regulation;
where applicable, assist with the age-assessment procedure referred to in Article 25;
where applicable, assist with the registration of the application;
where applicable, assist with the lodging of the application or lodge the application on behalf of the unaccompanied minor in accordance with Article 33;
where applicable, assist with the preparation of and be present for the personal interview and inform the unaccompanied minor about the purpose and possible consequences of the personal interview and about how to prepare for that interview;
where applicable, provide the unaccompanied minor with the relevant information and assist the unaccompanied minor in relation to the procedures provided for in Regulations (EU) 2024/1351 and (EU) 2024/1358.
In the personal interview, the representative and the legal adviser shall have an opportunity to ask questions or make comments within the framework set by the person conducting the interview.
The determining authority may require that the unaccompanied minor be present at the personal interview, even if the representative or legal adviser is present.
The representative shall be changed only if the competent authorities consider that the tasks of that representative or person have not been performed adequately. Organisations or natural persons whose interests conflict or could potentially conflict with those of the unaccompanied minor shall not be appointed as representative.
In the event of a disproportionate number of applications made by unaccompanied minors or in other exceptional situations, the number of unaccompanied minors per representative may be increased up to a maximum of 50 unaccompanied minors.
Member States shall ensure that there are administrative or judicial authorities or other entities responsible to supervise, on a regular basis, the proper performance of tasks by the representatives and persons designated under paragraph 2, first subparagraph, point (a), including by reviewing the criminal records of those appointed representatives and designated persons at regular intervals in order to identify potential incompatibilities with their role. Those administrative or judicial authorities or other entities shall review complaints lodged by unaccompanied minors against appointed representatives or persons designated under paragraph 2, first subparagraph, point (a).
SECTION V
Medical examination and age assessment
Article 24
Medical examination
The medical examination shall be free of charge for the applicant and be paid for from public funds.
Where applicable, the health and vulnerability checks referred to in Article 12 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1356 may be taken into account for the medical examination referred to in this Article.
Article 25
Age assessment of minors
Where this paragraph applies, the results from the medical examination and the multi-disciplinary assessment shall be analysed together, thereby allowing for the most reliable result possible.
CHAPTER III
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
SECTION I
Access to the Procedure
Article 26
Making an application for international protection
Where officials from the competent authority have doubts as to whether a certain declaration is to be construed as an application for international protection, they shall ask the person expressly whether he or she wishes to receive international protection.
Article 27
Registering applications for international protection
Without prejudice to the obligations to collect and transmit data in accordance with Article 15(1) Regulation (EU) 2024/1358, the authorities competent for registering applications, the authorities of another Member State referred to in Article 5(1), point (b) of this Regulation or the experts deployed by the Asylum Agency which assist them with that task shall register an application promptly and, in any event, no later than five days from when it is made. For that purpose, they shall register the following information, which may come from the screening form referred to in Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1356:
the applicant’s name, date and place of birth, gender, nationalities or the fact that the applicant is stateless, family members as defined in Article 2, point (8), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351 and, in the case of minors, siblings or relatives as defined in Article 2, point (9), of that Regulation present in a Member State, where applicable, and other personal details of the applicant relevant for the procedure for international protection and for the determination of the Member State responsible;
where available, the type, number and period of validity of any identity or travel document of the applicant and the country that issued that document and other documents provided by the applicant which the competent authority deems relevant for the purposes of identifying him or her, for the procedure for international protection and for the determination of the Member State responsible;
the date of the application, the place where the application was made and the authority to which the application was made;
the applicant’s location or the applicant’s place of residence or address and, where available, a telephone number and an email address where the applicant can be reached.
Where the data referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph have already been obtained by the Member States before the application is made, they shall not to be requested again.
Article 28
Lodging an application for international protection
Member States may provide in national law that an application is deemed to be lodged in person when the competent authority verifies that the applicant is physically present on the territory of the Member State at the time of registration or lodging of an application.
Member States may set a deadline within that timeframe for submitting those additional elements with which the applicant shall endeavour to comply.
In addition, applicants shall be allowed to submit any additional elements relevant for the examination of their application, until a decision under the administrative procedure is taken on their application. Member States may set a deadline within that timeframe for submitting those additional elements with which the applicant shall endeavour to comply.
Article 29
Documents provided to the applicant
Following a transfer in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351, the competent authorities of the Member State responsible shall, when the applicant identifies himself or herself to them, provide the applicant with a document in his or her name indicating that an application has been made and registered and that the person has been transferred. That document shall remain valid until the document referred to in paragraph 4 has been issued.
The competent authorities of the Member State where the application is lodged in accordance with Article 28(1) and (2) shall, as soon as possible after the lodging of the application, issue a document including at least the following elements, to be updated as necessary:
the applicant’s name, date and place of birth, gender and nationalities or, if applicable, an indication of statelessness, a facial image of the applicant and the applicant’s signature;
the issuing authority, date and place of issue and period of validity of the document;
the status of the individual as an applicant;
a statement that the applicant has the right to remain on the territory of that Member State for the purpose of having the application examined and an indication of whether the applicant is free to move within all or part of the territory of that Member State;
a statement that the document is not a travel document and that the applicant is not allowed to travel without authorisation to other Member States.
Upon release from detention or imprisonment, the applicant shall be provided with the document referred to in paragraph 1 or 4. Where the applicant is provided with the document referred to in paragraph 1 upon release, the applicant shall receive the document referred to in paragraph 4 as soon as possible.
Article 30
Access to the procedure in detention facilities and at border crossing points
Member States may impose limits on access as referred to in the first subparagraph, by virtue of national law, where they are objectively necessary for the security, public order or administrative management of a border crossing point, including transit zones, or detention facility, provided that access is not severely restricted or rendered impossible.
Article 31
Applications on behalf of adults requiring assistance to exercise legal capacity
Article 32
Applications on behalf of accompanied minors
Member States may decide to apply the first subparagraph also in the case of an accompanied minor who is born or who is present during the administrative procedure.
Article 33
Applications of unaccompanied minors
The first subparagraph of this paragraph shall apply without prejudice to unaccompanied minors’ right to legal counselling and to legal assistance and representation in accordance with Articles 15 and 16.
SECTION II
Examination Procedure
Article 34
Examination of applications
The determining authority shall take decisions on applications for international protection after an appropriate examination as to the admissibility or merits of an application. The determining authority shall examine applications objectively, impartially and on an individual basis. For the purpose of examining an application, the determining authority shall take the following into account:
the relevant statements and documentation presented by the applicant in accordance with Article 4(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347;
relevant, precise and up-to-date information relating to the situation prevailing in the country of origin of the applicant at the time of taking a decision on the application, including laws and regulations of the country of origin and the manner in which they are applied, obtained from relevant and available national, Union and international sources, including children’s rights organisations and, where available, the common analysis on the situation in specific countries of origin and the guidance notes referred to in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2303;
where applying the concepts of first country of asylum or safe third country, relevant, precise and up-to-date information relating to the situation prevailing in the third country being considered as a first country of asylum or a safe third country at the time of taking a decision on the application, including information and analysis on safe third countries referred to in Article 12 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2303;
the individual position and personal circumstances of the applicant, including factors such as the applicant’s background, age, gender, gender identity and sexual orientation, so as to assess whether, on the basis of the applicant’s personal circumstances, the acts to which the applicant has been or could be exposed would amount to persecution or serious harm;
whether the activities that the applicant was engaged in since leaving the country of origin were carried out by the applicant for the sole or main purpose of creating the necessary conditions for applying for international protection, so as to assess whether those activities would expose the applicant to persecution or serious harm, as referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347, if returned to that country;
whether the applicant could reasonably be expected to avail himself or herself of the protection of another country where he or she could assert citizenship;
provided that the State or agents of the State are not the actors of persecution or serious harm, whether the internal protection alternative referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347 applies.
The translation of those relevant documents or parts thereof may be provided by other entities and paid for from public funds in accordance with the national law of the Member State concerned. The applicant may, at his or her own cost, ensure the translation of other documents. For subsequent applications, the applicant may be made responsible for the translation of documents.
The determining authority may prioritise the examination of an application for international protection in particular where:
it considers that the application is likely to be well-founded;
the applicant has special reception needs within the meaning of Article 24 of Directive (EU) 2024/1346 or is in need of special procedural guarantees as referred to in Articles 20 to 23 of this Regulation, in particular where he or she is an unaccompanied minor;
there are reasonable grounds to consider the applicant as a danger to the national security or public order of the Member State;
the application is a subsequent application;
the applicant has been subject to a decision in accordance with Article 23(2), point (e), of Directive (EU) 2024/1346, has been involved in causing public nuisance or has engaged in criminal behaviour.
Article 35
Duration of the examination procedure
In the case referred to in Article 38(1), point (e), the determining authority shall conclude the examination within ten working days.
The application shall not be deemed to be admissible solely by reason of the fact that no decision on inadmissibility is taken within the time limits set out in this paragraph and in paragraph 2.
The determining authority may extend the time limits provided for in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 by no more than two months where:
a disproportionate number of third-country nationals or stateless persons make an application for international protection within the same period of time, making it unfeasible to conclude the admissibility procedure within the set time limits;
complex issues of fact or law are involved;
the delay can be attributed clearly and solely to the failure of the applicant to comply with his or her obligations under Article 9.
The determining authority may extend the time limit of six months referred to in paragraph 4 by a period of not more than six months where:
a disproportionate number of third-country nationals or stateless persons make an application for international protection within the same period of time, making it unfeasible to conclude the procedure within the six-month time limit;
complex issues of fact or law are involved;
the delay can be attributed clearly and solely to the failure of the applicant to comply with his or her obligations under Article 9.
The determining authority may postpone concluding the examination procedure where it cannot reasonably be expected to decide within the time limits laid down in paragraph 4 due to an uncertain situation in the country of origin which is expected to be temporary. In such cases, the determining authority shall:
conduct reviews of the situation in that country of origin at least every four months;
where available, take into account reviews of the situation in that country of origin carried out by the Asylum Agency;
inform the applicants concerned, in a language which they understand or are reasonably supposed to understand and as soon as possible, of the reasons for the postponement.
The Member State shall inform the Commission and the Asylum Agency as soon as possible of the postponement of procedures for that country of origin. In any event, the determining authority shall conclude the examination procedure within 21 months from the lodging of an application.
SECTION III
Decisions on applications
Article 36
Decisions on applications
Article 37
Rejection of an application and issuance of a return decision
Where an application is rejected as inadmissible, unfounded or manifestly unfounded with regard to both refugee status and subsidiary protection status, or as implicitly or explicitly withdrawn, Member States shall issue a return decision that respects Directive 2008/115/EC and that is in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement. Where a return decision or another decision imposing the obligation to return has already been issued prior to the making of an application for international protection, the return decision under this Article is not required. The return decision shall be issued as part of the decision rejecting the application for international protection or in a separate act. Where the return decision is issued as a separate act, it shall be issued at the same time and together with the decision rejecting the application for international protection or without undue delay thereafter.
Article 38
Decision on the admissibility of the application
The determining authority may assess the admissibility of an application, in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees provided for in Chapter II, and may be authorised under national law to reject an application as inadmissible where any of the following grounds applies:
a country which is not a Member State is considered to be a first country of asylum for the applicant pursuant to Article 58, unless it is clear that the applicant will not be admitted or readmitted to that country;
a country which is not a Member State is considered to be a safe third country for the applicant pursuant to Article 59, unless it is clear that the applicant will not be admitted or readmitted to that country;
a Member State other than the Member State examining the application has granted the applicant international protection;
an international criminal court or tribunal has provided safe relocation for the applicant to a Member State or third country, or is unequivocally undertaking actions to that extent, unless new relevant circumstances have arisen which have not been taken into account by the court or tribunal or where there was no legal possibility to raise circumstances relevant to internationally recognised human rights standards before that international criminal court or tribunal;
the applicant concerned was issued with a return decision in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 2008/115/EC and made his or her application only after seven working days from the date on which the applicant received that return decision, provided that he or she had been informed of the consequences of not making an application within that time limit and that no new relevant elements have arisen since the end of that period.
Article 39
Decision on the merits of an application
An application shall not be examined on the merits where:
another Member State is responsible in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1351;
an application is rejected as inadmissible in accordance with Article 38 or;
an application is explicitly or implicitly withdrawn, without prejudice to Article 40(4) and Article 41(5).
Article 40
Explicit withdrawal of applications
Article 41
Implicit withdrawal of applications
An application shall be declared as implicitly withdrawn where:
the applicant, without good cause, has not lodged his or her application in accordance with Article 28, despite having had an effective opportunity to do so;
the applicant refuses to cooperate by not providing the information referred to in Article 27(1), points (a) and (b), or by not providing his or her biometric data;
the applicant refuses to provide his or her address, where he or she has one, unless housing is provided by the competent authorities;
the applicant has, without justified cause, not attended a personal interview although he or she was required to do so pursuant to Article 13 or, without justified cause, refused to respond to questions during the interview to the extent that the outcome of the interview was not sufficient to take a decision on the merits of the application;
the applicant has repeatedly not complied with reporting duties imposed on him or her in accordance with Article 9(4) or does not remain available to the competent administrative or judicial authorities, unless he or she can demonstrate that that failure to remain available was owing to specific circumstances beyond his or her control;
the applicant has lodged the application in a Member State other than the Member State provided for in Article 17(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351 and does not remain present in that Member State pending the determination of the Member State responsible or the implementation of the transfer procedure, where applicable.
SECTION IV
Special Procedures
Article 42
Accelerated examination procedure
Without prejudice to Article 21(2), the determining authority shall, in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees provided for in Chapter II, accelerate the examination on the merits of an application for international protection where:
the applicant, in lodging his or her application and presenting the facts, has only raised issues that are not relevant to the examination of whether he or she qualifies as a beneficiary of international protection in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1347;
the applicant has made clearly inconsistent or contradictory or clearly false or obviously improbable representations or representations which contradict relevant and available country of origin information, thus making his or her claim clearly unconvincing as to whether he or she qualifies as a beneficiary of international protection in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1347;
the applicant, after having been provided with the full opportunity to show good cause, is considered to have intentionally misled the authorities by presenting false information or documents or by withholding relevant information or documents, particularly with respect to his or her identity or nationality, that could have had a negative impact on the decision or there are clear grounds to consider that the applicant has, in bad faith, destroyed or disposed of an identity or travel document in order to prevent the establishment of his or her identity or nationality;
the applicant makes an application merely to delay, frustrate or prevent the enforcement of a decision for his or her removal from the territory of a Member State;
a third country may be considered to be a safe country of origin for the applicant within the meaning of this Regulation;
there are reasonable grounds to consider the applicant a danger to the national security or public order of the Member States or the applicant had been forcibly expelled for serious reasons of national security or public order under national law;
the application is a subsequent application which is not inadmissible;
the applicant entered the territory of a Member State unlawfully or prolonged his or her stay unlawfully and, without good reason, has either not presented himself or herself to the competent authorities or has not made an application for international protection as soon as possible, given the circumstances of his or her entry;
the applicant entered the territory of a Member State lawfully and, without good reason, has not made an application for international protection as soon as possible, given the grounds of his or her application; this point is without prejudice to the need of international protection arising sur place; or
the applicant is of a nationality or, in the case of stateless persons, a former habitual resident of a third country for which the proportion of decisions by the determining authority granting international protection is, according to the latest available yearly Union-wide average Eurostat data, 20 % or lower, unless the determining authority assesses that a significant change has occurred in the third country concerned since the publication of the relevant Eurostat data or that the applicant belongs to a category of persons for whom the proportion of 20 % or lower cannot be considered to be representative for their protection needs, taking into account, inter alia, the significant differences between first instance and final decisions.
Where the Asylum Agency has provided a guidance note on a country of origin in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2303 showing that a significant change has occurred in the third country concerned since the publication of the relevant Eurostat data, Member States shall use that guidance note as a reference for the application of the first subparagraph, point (j), of this paragraph.
The accelerated examination procedure may be applied to unaccompanied minors only where:
the applicant comes from a third country that may be considered to be a safe country of origin within the meaning of this Regulation;
there are reasonable grounds to consider the applicant as a danger to the national security or public order of the Member State or the applicant had been forcibly expelled for serious reasons of national security or public order under national law;
the application is a subsequent application which is not inadmissible;
the applicant, after having been provided with the full opportunity to show good cause, is considered to have intentionally misled the authorities by presenting false information or documents or by withholding relevant information or documents, particularly with respect to his or her identity or nationality, that could have had a negative impact on the decision or there are clear grounds to consider that the applicant has, in bad faith, destroyed or disposed of an identity or travel document in order to prevent the establishment of his or her identity or nationality; or
the applicant is of a nationality or, in the case of stateless persons, a former habitual resident of a third country for which the proportion of decisions granting international protection by the determining authority is, according to the latest available yearly Union-wide average Eurostat data, 20 % or lower, unless the determining authority assesses a significant change has occurred in the third country concerned since the publication of the relevant Eurostat data or that the applicant belongs to a category of persons for whom the proportion of 20 % or lower cannot be considered to be representative for their protection needs, taking into account, inter alia, significant differences between first instance and final decisions.
Where the Asylum Agency has provided a guidance note on a country of origin in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2303 showing that a significant change has occurred in the third country concerned since the publication of the relevant Eurostat data, Member States shall use that guidance note as a reference for the application of the first subparagraph, point (e), of this paragraph.
Article 43
Conditions for applying the asylum border procedure
Following the screening carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1356, where applicable and provided that the applicant has not yet been authorised to enter Member States’ territory, a Member State may, in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees of Chapter II, examine an application in a border procedure where that application has been made by a third-country national or stateless person who does not fulfil the conditions for entry to the territory of a Member State as set out in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399. The border procedure may take place:
following an application made at an external border crossing point or in a transit zone;
following apprehension in connection with an unauthorised crossing of the external border;
following disembarkation in the territory of a Member State after a search and rescue operation;
following relocation in accordance with Article 67(11) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351.
By way of derogation from Article 51(2), first subparagraph, last sentence, the applicant shall not be authorised to enter the Member State’s territory where:
the applicant has no right to remain on the territory of a Member State in accordance with Article 10(4), point (a) or (c);
the applicant has no right to remain on the territory of a Member State in accordance with Article 68 and has not requested to be allowed to remain for the purposes of an appeal procedure within the applicable time limit;
the applicant has no right to remain on the territory of a Member State in accordance with Article 68 and a court or tribunal has decided that the applicant is not to be allowed to remain pending the outcome of an appeal procedure.
In the cases referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph, where the applicant has been subject to a return decision issued in accordance with the Directive 2008/115/EC or has been refused entry in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1349 shall apply.
Article 44
Decisions in the framework of the asylum border procedure
Where a border procedure is applied, decisions may be taken on the following:
the inadmissibility of an application in accordance with Article 38;
the merits of an application where any of the circumstances referred to in Article 42(1), points (a) to (g) and (j), and Article 42(3), point (b), apply.
Where the number of applicants exceeds the number referred to in Article 47(1) and for the purpose of determining whom to subject to a border procedure pursuant to Article 42(1), point (c), (f) or (j), or Article 42(3), point (b), priority shall be given to the following categories of applications:
applications of certain third-country nationals or, in the case of stateless persons, of former habitual residents in a third country who, in the event of a negative decision, have a higher prospect of being returned, as applicable, to their country of origin, to their country of former habitual residence, to a safe third country or to a first country of asylum, within the meaning of this Regulation;
applications of certain third-country nationals or, in the case of stateless persons, of former habitual residents in a third country who are considered, on serious grounds, to pose a danger to the national security or public order of a Member State;
without prejudice to point (b), applications of certain third-country nationals or, in the case of stateless persons, of former habitual residents in a third country who are not minors and their family members.
Member States may also give priority to the examination of applications of certain third-country nationals or, in the case of stateless persons, of former habitual residents in a third country who, in the event of a negative decision, have a higher prospect of being returned, as applicable, to their country of origin, to their country of former habitual residence, to a safe third country or to a first country of asylum, within the meaning of this Regulation.
Article 45
Mandatory application of the asylum border procedure
For the purposes of paragraph 2, in order to maintain family unity, ‘members of that applicant’s family’ shall be understood as meaning, in so far as the family already existed before the applicant arrived on the territory of the Member States, the following members of the applicant’s family who are present on the territory of the same Member State in relation to the application for international protection:
the spouse of the applicant or his or her unmarried partner in a stable relationship, where the law or practice of the Member State concerned treats unmarried couples as equivalent to married couples;
the minor children of couples as referred to in point (a) or of the applicant, on condition that they are unmarried and regardless of whether they were born in or out of wedlock or adopted as defined under national law;
where the applicant is a minor and unmarried, the father, mother or another adult responsible for the applicant, whether by the law or practice of the Member State in which the adult is present;
where the applicant is a minor and unmarried, the sibling or siblings of the applicant, provided they are unmarried and minors.
For the purposes of points (b), (c) and (d) of the first subparagraph, on the basis of an individual assessment, a minor shall be considered unmarried if his or her marriage could not be contracted in accordance with the national law of the Member State concerned, in particular having regard to the legal age of marriage.
The Member State concerned shall take utmost account of the Commission’s recommendation with respect to its obligations under Article 53(2), point (b), and with a view to addressing any shortcomings identified to ensure full compliance with the requirements of Article 54(2). The Member State concerned shall inform the Commission of the measures taken to give effect to the recommendation.
Article 46
The adequate capacity at Union level
The adequate capacity at Union level shall be considered to be 30 000 .
Article 47
The adequate capacity of a Member State
Without prejudice to paragraph 3, the Commission shall also, by means of implementing acts, set the maximum number of applications a Member State is required to examine in the border procedure per year. That maximum number shall be two times the number obtained by using the formula laid down in paragraph 4 from 12 June 2026, three times the number obtained by using the formula laid down in paragraph 4 from 13 June 2027 and four times the number obtained by using the formula laid down in paragraph 4 from 13 June 2028.
Following the adoption by the Commission of an implementing act as referred to in paragraph 1, each Member State shall ensure, within six months of the adoption of the second and all subsequent such implementing acts, that it has the adequate capacity set out in that implementing act in place. For the purposes of the first such implementing act, Member States shall ensure they have the adequate capacity set out in that implementing act in place before 12 June 2026.
Article 48
Measure applicable where the adequate capacity of a Member State is reached
Article 49
Notification by a Member State where the adequate capacity is reached
The notification referred to in Article 48 shall contain the following information:
the number of applicants that are subject to the asylum border procedure, a return border procedure established pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/1349 or, where applicable, an equivalent return border procedure established under national law in the Member State concerned at the time of the notification;
the measure referred to in Article 48 that the Member State concerned intends to apply or to continue applying;
a substantiated reasoning in support of the intention of the Member State concerned, describing how resorting to the measure in question could help in addressing the situation and, where applicable, other measures that the Member State concerned has adopted or envisages adopting at national level to alleviate the situation, including those referred to in Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351
A Member State applying the measure referred to in Article 48 shall inform the Commission on a monthly basis about the following elements:
the number of applicants that are subject to the border procedure in that Member State at that time;
the inflow-outflow evolution of the number of persons that are subject to border procedures for each week that month;
the number of staff responsible for examining applications in the border procedure;
the average duration of the examination during the administrative stage of the procedure; and
the average duration of the examination by a court or tribunal of a request to be allowed to remain pending the appeal.
The Commission shall monitor the application of the measure referred to in Article 48 of this Regulation and to that effect review the information provided by Member States. The Commission shall, within the report referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351, provide an assessment of the application of the measure referred to in Article 48 of this Regulation in every Member State.
Article 50
Notification by a Member State where the annual maximum number of applications is reached
Where the number of applications that have been examined in the border procedure in a Member State within one calendar year is equal to or exceeds the maximum number of applications set out in respect of that Member State in the implementing act referred to in Article 47(1), that Member State may notify the Commission accordingly.
Where the Member State has notified the Commission in accordance with the first paragraph of this Article, the Commission shall promptly examine the information provided by the Member State concerned in order to verify that the Member State concerned has examined in the border procedure since the beginning of the calendar year a number of applications that is equal to or exceeds the number set out in respect of that Member State in the implementing act referred to in Article 47(1).
On completion of the verification, the Commission shall authorise, by means of an implementing act, the Member State concerned to not examine in the border procedure applications made by applicants as referred to in Article 42(1), points (c) and (j).
Such an authorisation shall not exempt the Member State from the obligation to examine in the border procedure applications made by applicants as referred to in Article 42(1), point (f), and Article 42(3), point (b).
Article 51
Deadlines
Member States shall lay down provisions on the duration of the examination procedure, by way of derogation from Article 35, of the examination by a court or tribunal of a request to remain lodged in accordance with Article 68(4) and (5) and, where applicable, of the appeal procedure. The duration laid down shall ensure that all those procedural steps are finalised within 12 weeks from when the application is registered.
The 12-week period may be extended to 16 weeks if the Member State to which the person is transferred pursuant to Article 67(11) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1351 is applying the border procedure.
Article 52
Determination of Member State responsible and relocation
Article 53
Exceptions to the asylum border procedure
Member States shall not apply or shall cease to apply the border procedure at any stage of the procedure where:
the determining authority considers that the grounds for rejecting an application as inadmissible or for applying the accelerated examination procedure are not applicable or no longer applicable;
the necessary support cannot be provided to applicants with special reception needs, including minors, in accordance with Chapter IV of Directive (EU) 2024/1346, at the locations referred to in Article 54;
the necessary support cannot be provided to applicants in need of special procedural guarantees at the locations referred to in Article 54;
there are relevant medical reasons for not applying the border procedure, including mental health reasons;
the guarantees and conditions for detention laid down in Articles 10 to 13 of Directive (EU) 2024/1346 are not met or no longer met and the border procedure cannot be applied to the applicant without the use of detention.
In the cases set out in the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the competent authority shall authorise the applicant to enter the territory of the Member State and apply the appropriate procedure provided for in Chapter III.
Article 54
Locations for carrying out the asylum border procedure
Article 55
Subsequent applications
That further representation shall be examined in the Member State responsible in the framework of the ongoing examination in the administrative procedure or in the framework of any ongoing appeal procedure in so far as the competent court or tribunal may take into account the elements underlying the further representation.
A subsequent application shall be subject to a preliminary examination in which the determining authority shall establish whether new elements have arisen or have been presented by the applicant and which:
significantly increase the likelihood of the applicant to qualify as a beneficiary of international protection in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1347; or
relate to an inadmissibility ground previously applied, where the previous application was rejected as inadmissible.
Article 56
Exception from the right to remain in subsequent applications
Without prejudice to the principle of non-refoulement, Member States may provide for an exception to the right to remain on their territory and derogate from Article 68(5), point (d), where:
a first subsequent application has been lodged, merely in order to delay or frustrate the enforcement of a decision which would result in the applicant’s imminent removal from that Member State and is not further examined pursuant to Article 55(7); or
a second or further subsequent application is made in any Member State following a final decision rejecting a previous subsequent application as inadmissible or unfounded or manifestly unfounded.
SECTION V
Safe country concepts
Article 57
The notion of effective protection
In cases other than that referred to in paragraph 1, the third country shall be considered to ensure effective protection only where the following criteria are met as a minimum:
the persons referred to in paragraph 1 are allowed to remain on the territory of the third country in question,
the persons referred to in paragraph 1 have access to means of subsistence sufficient to maintain an adequate standard of living with regard to the overall situation of that hosting third country,
the persons referred to in paragraph 1 have access to healthcare and essential treatment for illnesses under the conditions generally provided for in that third country;
the persons referred to in paragraph 1 have access to education under the conditions generally provided for in that third country; and
effective protection remains available until a durable solution can be found.
Article 58
The concept of first country of asylum
A third country may only be considered to be a first country of asylum for an applicant where in that country:
the applicant enjoyed effective protection in accordance with the Geneva Convention, as referred to in Article 57(1), or enjoyed effective protection as referred to in Article 57(2), before travelling to the Union, and he or she can still avail himself or herself of that protection;
the applicant’s life and liberty are not threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion;
the applicant faces no real risk of serious harm as defined in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347;
the applicant is protected against refoulement in accordance with the Geneva Convention and against removal in violation of the right to protection from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment as laid down in international law.
Where an application is rejected as inadmissible as a result of the application of the concept of first country of asylum, the determining authority shall:
inform the applicant in accordance with Article 36; and
provide him or her with a document informing the authorities of the third country in question, in the language of that country, that the application has not been examined in substance as a consequence of the application of the concept of first country of asylum.
Article 59
The concept of safe third country
A third country may only be designated as a safe third country where in that country:
non-nationals’ life and liberty are not threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion;
non-nationals face no real risk of serious harm as defined in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347;
non-nationals are protected against refoulement in accordance with the Geneva Convention and against removal in violation of the right to protection from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment as laid down in international law;
the possibility exists to request and, where conditions are fulfilled, receive effective protection as defined in Article 57.
The concept of safe third country may be applied:
where a third country has been designated as safe third country at Union or national level in accordance with Article 60 or 64; or
in relation to a specific applicant where the country has not been designated as safe third country at Union or national level, provided that the conditions set out in paragraph 1 are met with regard to that applicant.
The concept of safe third country may only be applied provided that:
the applicant cannot provide elements justifying why the concept of safe third country is not applicable to him or her, in the framework of an individual assessment;
one of the following conditions is met:
there is a connection between the applicant and the third country concerned on the basis of which it would be reasonable for him or her to go to that country;
the applicant has transited through the third country concerned on the way to the Union; or
there is an agreement or an arrangement concluded between the Union, one or more Member States or one or more Member States and third countries, on the one hand, and the third country concerned, on the other hand, requiring the examination of the merits of any requests for effective protection made in the third country concerned by applicants covered by that agreement or arrangement.
Where the Commission enters into negotiations for an agreement on behalf of the Union with a third country (‘Union-level agreement’) with a view to concluding an agreement as referred to in the first subparagraph, point (b)(iii), it shall take any existing bilateral or multilateral agreements between the Member States and the same third country into account in the course of the negotiations, including the potential impact of the Union-level agreement on those bilateral or multilateral agreements and on the Member States’ cooperation with that third country in the field of migration.
An agreement concluded by the Union and a third country falling within the scope of the first subparagraph, point (b)(iii), shall take precedence over any bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements concluded between individual Member States and the same third country, in so far as their provisions are incompatible with those of that Union-level agreement.
A Member State shall, at an appropriate time, inform the relevant Member States of negotiations on an agreement or arrangement as referred to in the first subparagraph, point (b)(iii), with a third country that shares a common border with those Member States.
Member States shall inform the Commission and the other Member States of any bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements concluded in accordance with the first subparagraph, point (b)(iii), prior to their entry into force, or, where an agreement or arrangement is to be applied provisionally, before the beginning of its provisional application. The Commission and the other Member States shall also be informed of any subsequent changes to, or the termination of, such agreements or arrangements.
Where an application is rejected as inadmissible as a result of the application of the concept of safe third country, the determining authority shall:
inform the applicant in accordance with Article 36; and
provide him or her with a document informing the authorities of the third country in question, in the language of that country, that the application has not been examined in substance in the Union as a consequence of the application of the concept of safe third country, without prejudice to the application of different procedures for informing the authorities of the third country set out in agreements or arrangements already in place between the Union or that Member State and the third country concerned, as referred to in paragraph 5, first subparagraph, point (b)(iii).
Article 60
Designation of safe third countries at Union level
Article 61
The concept of safe country of origin
In making the assessment referred to in paragraph 3, account shall be taken, inter alia, of the extent to which protection is provided against persecution or serious harm by:
the relevant laws and regulations of the country and the manner in which they are applied;
observance of the rights and freedoms laid down in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms or the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights or the United Nations Convention against Torture, in particular the rights from which derogation cannot be made under Article 15(2) of the said European Convention;
the absence of expulsion, removal or extradition of own citizens to third countries where, inter alia, there is a serious risk that they would be subjected to the death penalty, torture, persecution or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, or where their lives or freedom would be threatened on account of their race, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, or from which there is a serious risk of an expulsion, removal or extradition to another third country;
the provision for a system of effective remedies against violations of those rights and freedoms.
The concept of a safe country of origin may only be applied provided that:
the applicant has the nationality of that country or he or she is a stateless person and was formerly habitually resident in that country;
the applicant does not belong to a category of persons for which an exception was made when designating the third country as a safe country of origin;
the applicant cannot provide elements justifying why the concept of safe country of origin is not applicable to him or her, in the framework of an individual assessment.
Article 62
Designation of safe countries of origin at Union level
A third country that has been granted the status of candidate State for accession to the Union is also designated as a safe country of origin at Union level, except where one or more of the following circumstances apply:
there is a serious threat to a civilian’s life or person by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict in that third country;
restrictive measures within the meaning of Title IV of Part Five of the TFEU have been adopted in view of that third country’s actions affecting fundamental rights and freedoms that are relevant for the criteria of designation of a third country as a safe country of origin as set out in Article 61 of this Regulation;
the proportion of decisions by the determining authority granting international protection to the applicants from that third country – either its nationals or former habitual residents in case of stateless persons – is higher than 20 % of the total number of decisions for that third country issued by the determining authority according to the latest available yearly Union-wide average Eurostat data.
Where any of the circumstances referred to in the first subparagraph, points (a) to (c), apply, or cease to apply, the Commission shall immediately inform the Member States, the European Parliament and the Council thereof. In the case of point (a) of this paragraph, the Commission shall obtain the prior approval of the Council before informing the Member States and the European Parliament.
Article 63
Suspension and removal of the designation of a third country as a safe third country or as a safe country of origin at Union level
In the event of significant changes in the situation of a third country which is designated as a safe third country or as a safe country of origin at Union level, the Commission shall conduct a substantiated assessment of the fulfilment by that third country of the conditions set out in Article 59 or 61 and, where the Commission considers that those conditions are no longer met, in whole or in part, the following provisions shall apply:
where the conditions set out in Article 59 or 61 are no longer met in relation to specific parts of the third country’s territory or in relation to clearly identifiable categories of persons in that third country, the Commission shall adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 74 to partially suspend the designation of that third country as a safe third country or as a safe country of origin at Union level for those parts of that third country’s territory or for those categories of persons for a period of six months;
where the conditions set out in Article 59 or 61 are no longer met in relation to the third country as a whole, the Commission shall adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 74 to fully suspend the designation of that third country as a safe third country or as a safe country of origin at Union level for a period of six months.
Where the Commission has adopted a delegated act in accordance with paragraph 1, point (a) or (b), suspending the designation of a third country as a safe third country or as a safe country of origin at Union level for all or specific parts of that third country’s territory or for all or for clearly identifiable categories of persons in that third country, it shall, within three months of the date of adoption of that delegated act, submit a proposal, in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, in order to:
amend that third country’s designation as a safe third country or as a safe country of origin at Union level to provide for exceptions to the designation for the specific parts of territory or for the clearly identifiable categories of persons covered by the delegated act adopted pursuant to paragraph 1, point (a); or
remove that third country’s designation as a safe third country or as a safe country of origin at Union level.
Article 64
Designation of third countries as safe third country or safe country of origin at national level
The notification shall include a substantiated assessment of the fulfilment by that third country of the conditions set out in Article 59(1) or Article 61, including an explanation of the specific changes in the situation of the third country which make that country fulfil those conditions again. Where applicable, the Member State shall specify in its notification the specific parts of that third country’s territory to which, or the clearly identifiable categories of persons in that third country to whom, its assessment applies.
Following the notification, the Commission shall request the Asylum Agency to provide it with information and analysis on the situation in the third country.
Where the third country notified by the Member State has had its designation as a safe third country or as a safe country of origin at Union level removed pursuant to Article 63(3), point (b), the notifying Member State may only designate that third country as a safe third country or as a safe country of origin at national level provided that the Commission does not object to that designation.
The Commission’s right of objection shall be limited to a period of two years after the date on which that third country’s designation as a safe third country or a safe country of origin at Union level has been removed. Any objection by the Commission shall be issued within a period of three months after the date of each notification by the Member State and after due review of the situation in that third country, having regard to the conditions set out in Articles 59(1) and 61.
Where the Commission considers that the conditions set out in Article 59(1) or 61 are once again fulfilled with regard to all or specific parts of the third country’s territory or all or clearly identifiable categories of persons in the third country covered by the notification received pursuant to the first subparagraph of this paragraph, it may submit a proposal to amend this Regulation, in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, in order to designate that third country as a safe third country or as a safe country of origin at Union level with regard to all or specific parts of that third country’s territory in which or with regard to all or clearly identifiable categories of persons in relation to whom those conditions are met.
CHAPTER IV
PROCEDURES FOR THE WITHDRAWAL OF INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION
Article 65
Withdrawal of international protection
The determining authority or, where provided for by national law, a competent court or tribunal shall start the examination to withdraw international protection from a third-country national or stateless person when new elements or findings arise indicating that there are reasons to reconsider whether he or she qualifies for international protection, in particular in the instances referred to in Articles 14 and 19 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347.
Article 66
Procedural rules for withdrawal of international protection
Where the determining authority or, where provided for by national law, a competent court or tribunal starts the examination to withdraw international protection from a third-country national or a stateless person, the person concerned shall enjoy the following guarantees:
he or she shall be informed in writing that his or her qualification as a beneficiary of international protection is being reconsidered and the reasons for such reconsideration;
he or she shall be informed of the obligation to cooperate with the determining authority and other competent authorities, in particular of the fact that he or she shall be required to make a written statement and appear for a personal interview or a hearing and answer questions;
he or she shall be informed of the consequences of not cooperating with the determining authority and other competent authorities and that failure to submit the written statement and to attend the personal interview or the hearing without due justification shall not prevent the determining authority or the competent court or tribunal from taking a decision to withdraw international protection; and
he or she shall be given the opportunity to submit reasons as to why his or her international protection should not be withdrawn by means of a written statement within reasonable time from the date on which he or she receives the information referred to in point (a) and in a personal interview or hearing at a date set by the determining authority or, where provided for by national law, the competent court or tribunal.
For the purposes of paragraph 1, the determining authority or the competent court or tribunal:
shall obtain relevant, precise and up-to-date information from relevant and available national, Union and international sources and, where available, take into account the common analysis on the situation in a specific country of origin and the guidance notes referred to in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2021/2303; and
shall not obtain any information from the alleged actors of persecution or serious harm in a manner that would result in such actors being informed of the fact that the person concerned is a beneficiary of international protection whose status is under reconsideration.
The procedure set out in this Article shall not apply where the third-country national or stateless person:
unequivocally renounces his or her recognition as beneficiary of international protection;
has become a national of a Member State; or
has subsequently been granted international protection in another Member State.
Member States shall conclude the cases covered by this paragraph in accordance with their national law. That conclusion need not take the form of a decision but shall be recorded at least in the applicant’s file together with the indication of the legal ground for that conclusion.
CHAPTER V
APPEAL PROCEDURE
Article 67
The right to an effective remedy
Applicants and persons subject to withdrawal of international protection shall have the right to an effective remedy before a court or tribunal, in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees provided for in Chapter II that relate to the appeal procedure, against the following:
a decision rejecting an application as inadmissible;
a decision rejecting an application as unfounded or manifestly unfounded in relation to both refugee and subsidiary protection status;
a decision rejecting an application as implicitly withdrawn;
a decision withdrawing international protection;
a return decision issued in accordance with Article 37 of this Regulation.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, point (d), of this paragraph, Member States may provide in their national law that the cases referred to in Article 66(6) are not to be subject to an appeal.
Where a return decision is taken as a part of a related decision as referred to in points (a), (b), (c) or (d) of the first subparagraph, the return decision shall be appealed jointly with that related decision, before the same court or tribunal, within the same judicial proceedings and the same time limits. Where a return decision is issued as a separate act pursuant to Article 37, it may be appealed in separate judicial proceedings. The time limits for those separate judicial proceedings shall not exceed the time limits referred to in paragraph 7 of this Article.
An applicant, a person subject to withdrawal of international protection and a person recognised as eligible for subsidiary protection may, at his or her own cost, ensure the translation of other documents.
Member States shall lay down the following time limits in their national law for applicants, persons subject to withdrawal of international protection and persons recognised as eligible for subsidiary protection to lodge appeals against the decisions referred to in paragraph 1:
between a minimum of five days and a maximum of ten days in the case of a decision rejecting an application as inadmissible, as implicitly withdrawn, as unfounded or as manifestly unfounded if at the time of the decision any of the circumstances referred to in Article 42(1) or (3) apply;
between a minimum of two weeks and a maximum of one month in all other cases.
Article 68
Suspensive effect of appeal
Without prejudice to the principle of non-refoulement, the applicant and the person subject to withdrawal of international protection shall not have the right to remain pursuant to paragraph 2 where the competent authority has taken one of the following decisions:
a decision which rejects an application as unfounded or manifestly unfounded if at the time of the decision:
the applicant is subject to an accelerated examination pursuant to Article 42(1) or (3);
the applicant is subject to the border procedure, except where the applicant is an unaccompanied minor;
a decision which rejects an application as inadmissible pursuant to Article 38(1), point (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e), or Article 38(2), except where the applicant is an unaccompanied minor subject to the border procedure;
a decision which rejects an application as implicitly withdrawn;
a decision which rejects a subsequent application as unfounded or manifestly unfounded; or
a decision to withdraw international protection in accordance with Article 14(1), point (b), (d) or (e), or Article 19(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347.
For the purposes of paragraph 4, the following conditions shall apply where relevant in the light of any ex officio decisions:
the applicant or the person subject to withdrawal of international protection shall have a time limit of at least five days from the date on which the decision is notified to him or her to request to be allowed to remain on the territory pending the outcome of the remedy;
the applicant or the person subject to withdrawal of international protection shall be provided with interpretation in the event of a hearing before the competent court or tribunal, where appropriate communication cannot otherwise be ensured;
the applicant or the person subject to withdrawal of international protection shall be provided, upon request, with free legal assistance and representation in accordance with Article 17;
the applicant or the person subject to withdrawal of international protection shall not be removed from the territory of the Member State responsible:
until the time limit for requesting a court or tribunal to be allowed to remain has expired;
where the applicant or the person subject to withdrawal of international protection has requested to be allowed to remain within the set time limit, pending the decision of the court or tribunal on whether or not the applicant or the person subject to withdrawal of international protection shall be allowed to remain on the territory;
the applicant or the person subject to withdrawal of international protection shall be duly informed in a timely manner of her or his rights under this paragraph.
Article 69
Duration of the first level of appeal
Without prejudice to an adequate and complete examination of an appeal, Member States shall lay down in their national law reasonable time limits for the court or tribunal to examine decisions in accordance with Article 67(1).
CHAPTER VI
FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 70
Challenge by public authorities
This Regulation does not affect the possibility for public authorities to challenge administrative or judicial decisions as provided for in national legislation.
Article 71
Cooperation
Article 72
Data storage
Article 73
Calculation of time limits
Unless otherwise provided, any period of time prescribed in this Regulation shall be calculated as follows:
a period expressed in days, weeks or months shall be calculated from the time an event occurs or an action takes place; the day on which that event occurs or that action takes place shall not itself be counted as falling within the period in question;
a period expressed in weeks or months shall end with the expiry of whichever day in the last week or month is the same day of the week, or falls on the same date of the month, respectively as the day on which the event or action from which the period is to be calculated occurred or took place; where, in a period expressed in months, the day on which it should expire does not occur in the last month of the period, the period shall end at midnight of the last day of that last month;
time limits shall include Saturdays, Sundays and official holidays in the Member State concerned; where a time limit ends on a Saturday, Sunday or official holiday, the next working day shall be counted as the last day of the time limit.
Article 74
Exercise of the delegation
Article 75
Transitional measures
By 12 September 2024, the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States and relevant Union bodies, offices and agencies, shall present a common implementation plan to the Council to ensure that Member States are adequately prepared to implement this Regulation by 1 July 2026, assessing any gaps identified and operational steps required, and shall inform the European Parliament thereof.
Based on the common implementation plan referred to in the first paragraph, by 12 December 2024 each Member State shall, with the support of the Commission and relevant Union bodies, offices and agencies, establish a national implementation plan setting the actions and the timeline for their implementation. Each Member State shall complete the implementation of its plan by 1 July 2026.
For the purpose of implementing this Article, Member States may use the support of the relevant Union bodies, offices and agencies and the Union Funds may provide financial support to the Member States, in accordance with the legal acts governing those bodies, offices and agencies and Funds.
The Commission shall closely monitor the implementation of the national implementation plans.
Article 76
Financial support
Actions undertaken by Member States for putting in place free legal counselling and adequate capacity for carrying out the border procedure in accordance with this Regulation shall be eligible for financial support from the funds made available under the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework.
Article 77
Monitoring and evaluation
By 13 June 2028 and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Regulation in the Member States and shall, where appropriate, propose any amendments.
Member States shall, at the request of the Commission, send it the necessary information for drawing up its report no later than nine months before that time limit expires.
By 12 June 2027 and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall assess whether the numbers set out in Article 46 and in Article 47(1), second subparagraph, and the exceptions to the asylum border procedure continue to be adequate in view of the overall migratory situation in the Union and shall, where appropriate, propose any targeted amendments.
By 12 June 2025, the Commission shall review the concept of safe third country and shall, where appropriate, propose any targeted amendments.
Article 78
Repeal
Article 79
Entry into force and application
However, Article 59(2), Article 61(2) and Article 61(5), point (b) of this Regulation shall apply from 27 February 2026 as regards the application of the concept of safe country of origin in accordance with Articles 36 and 37 of Directive 2013/32/EU and that of safe third country in accordance with Article 38 of Directive 2013/32/EU.
A Member State may apply Article 42(1), point (j), and Article 42(3), point (e) of this Regulation as grounds for the accelerated examination procedure in accordance with Article 31(8) of Directive 2013/32/EU or for the procedure conducted at the border or in transit zones in accordance with Article 43 of Directive 2013/32/EU before 12 June 2026 if it has transposed the relevant provisions and implemented the special procedures set out in those Articles at national level before 27 February 2026.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.
ANNEX I
Correlation table
|
Directive 2013/32/EU |
This Regulation |
|
Article 1 |
Article 1 |
|
Article 2 |
Article 3 |
|
Article 2, point (a) |
— |
|
Article 2, points (b), (c) and (d) |
Article 3, points (12), (13) and (14) |
|
Article 2, point (e) |
Article 3, point (8) |
|
Article 2, point (f) |
Article 3, point (16) |
|
Article 2, points (g) and (h) |
Article 3, points (1) and (2) |
|
Article 2, point (i) |
Article 3, point (5) |
|
Article 2, points (j) and (k) |
Article 3, points (3) and (4) |
|
Article 2, points (l) and (m) |
Article 3, points (6) and (7) |
|
Article 2, point (n) |
— |
|
Article 2, points (o), (p) and (q) |
Article 3, points (17), (18) and(19) |
|
— |
Article 3, points (9), (10) (11), (15) and (20) |
|
Article 3(1) |
Article 2(1) |
|
Article 3(2) |
Article 2(2) |
|
Article 3(3) |
Article 2(3) |
|
Article 4(1) |
Article 4(1) and (7) |
|
Article 4(2), point (a) |
Article 4 (6) |
|
Article 4(2), point (b) |
— |
|
— |
Article 4(3) and (5) |
|
Article 4(3) |
Article 4(8) |
|
Article 4(4) |
— |
|
Article 4(5) |
— |
|
Article 5 |
— |
|
— |
Article 5 |
|
— |
Article 26 |
|
Article 6(1), first subparagraph |
Article 27(1), first subparagraph, first sentence |
|
Article 6(1), second subparagraph |
Article 4(4) and Article 27(3) |
|
Article 6(1), third subparagraph |
Article 4(2) |
|
— |
Article 27(1), first subparagraph, points (a) to (d), and second subparagraph |
|
— |
Article 27(2), (4), (6) and (7) |
|
Article 6(2) |
Article 28(1) and Article 41(1), point (a) |
|
— |
Article 28(2) |
|
Article 6(3) |
Article 28(3) |
|
Article 6(4) |
Article 28(4) |
|
— |
Article 28(5), (6) and (7) |
|
Article 6(5) |
Article 27(5) |
|
— |
Article 29 |
|
Article 7 |
Article 31 and 32 |
|
Article 7(1) |
— |
|
Article 7(2), first subparagraph |
Article 31(1) |
|
Article 7(2), second subparagraph |
— |
|
— |
Article 31(2) |
|
Article 7(3) |
Article 32(1) |
|
— |
Article 32(2) and (3) |
|
Article 7(4) and (5) |
— |
|
Article 7(5) |
— |
|
— |
Article 33 |
|
Article 8(1) |
Article 30(1) and (2) |
|
Article 8(2) |
Article 30(3) |
|
Article 9(1) |
Article 10(1) and (2) |
|
Article 9(2) |
Article 10(3) and Article 10(4), points (a) and (b) |
|
Article 9(3) |
Article 10(5) |
|
— |
Article 10(4)(c) |
|
Article 10(1) |
— |
|
Article 10(2) |
Article 39(2) |
|
Article 10(3) |
Article 34(2) |
|
Article 10(3), point (a) |
Article 34(2) |
|
— |
Article 34(2), point (a) |
|
Article 10(3), point (b) |
Article 34(2), point (b) |
|
— |
Article 34(2), points (c) to (g) |
|
Article 10(3), points (c) and (d) |
Article 34(3) |
|
Article 10(4) |
— |
|
Article 10(5) |
Article 34(4) |
|
Article 11(1) |
Article 36(1) |
|
Article 11(2), first subparagraph |
Article 36(2) and (3) |
|
Article 11(2), second subparagraph |
— |
|
Article 11(3) |
Article 36(3) |
|
— |
Article 36(4) |
|
Article 12(1) |
Article 8(1) |
|
Article 12(1), point (a) |
Article 8(2), first subparagraph, points (b),(c), (e), and second subparagraph |
|
— |
Article 8(2), first subparagraph, points (a) and (d) |
|
— |
Article 8(2), third subparagraph |
|
Article 12(1), point (b) |
Article 8(3) |
|
Article 12(1), point (c) |
Article 8(4) |
|
Article 12(1), point (d) |
Article 8(5) |
|
Article 12(1), point (e) |
Article 8(6) |
|
Article 12(1), point (f) |
Article 8(2), first subparagraph, point (f) |
|
— |
Article 8(7) |
|
Article 12(2) |
— |
|
— |
Article 9(1) |
|
Article 13(1) |
Article 9(2) |
|
— |
Article 9(2), first subparagraph, points (a),(b), (d), (e), (g) and (h) |
|
Article 13(2), point (a) |
Article 9(4) |
|
Article 13(2), point (b) |
Article 9(2), first subparagraph, point (f) |
|
Article 13(2), point (c) |
Article 9(2), first subparagraph, point (c), and Article 9(3) |
|
Article 13(2), point (d) |
Article 9(5) |
|
Article 13(2), point (e) |
— |
|
Article 13(2), point (f) |
— |
|
— |
Article 9(2), second subparagraph |
|
Article 14(1), first subparagraph |
Article 11(1), Article 12(1) and Article 13(6), first sentence |
|
— |
Article 11(2) |
|
— |
Article 13(1), |
|
Article 14(1), second subparagraph |
Article 13(6) |
|
Article 14(1), third subparagraph |
Article 13(2) |
|
Article 14(1), fourth subparagraph |
Article 22(3), first subparagraph |
|
Article 14(2), first subparagraph |
Article 13(11) |
|
Article 14(2), point (a) |
Article 13(11), point (a) |
|
— |
Article 13 (8) and (10) |
|
— |
Article 13(11), first subparagraph, points (b),(d) and (e), and third subparagraph |
|
— |
Article 13(13), first subparagraph |
|
Article 14(2), point (b) |
Article 13(11), first subparagraph, point (c) |
|
Article 14(2), second subparagraph |
Article 13(11), second subparagraph |
|
Article 14(3) |
Article 13(14) |
|
Article 14(4) |
Article 13(11), second subparagraph |
|
Article 14(5) |
Article 41(1), point (d) |
|
Article 15(1) |
— |
|
Article 15(2) |
Article 13(3) |
|
Article 15(3) |
Article 13(3) |
|
Article 15(3), point (a) |
Article 13(7), point (a) |
|
Article 15(3), point (b) |
Article 13(9) |
|
Article 15(3), point (c) |
Article 13(5) and (9) |
|
Article 15(3), point (d) |
Article 13(7), point (b) |
|
Article 15(3), point (e) |
Article 22(3), second subparagraph |
|
— |
Article 13(8) |
|
— |
Article 13(10) |
|
— |
Article 13(1) |
|
Article 15(4) |
— |
|
Article 16 |
Article 12(2) |
|
Article 17(1) |
Article 14(1) |
|
Article 17(2) |
Article 14(2) |
|
Article 17(3), first subparagraph |
Article 14(3) and (4) |
|
Article 17(3), second subparagraph |
Article 14(5) |
|
Article 17(4) |
Article 14(4) |
|
Article 17(5), first subparagraph |
Article 14(6), first subparagraph |
|
Article 17(5), second subparagraph |
Article 14(5), second subparagraph |
|
Article 17(5), third subparagraph |
— |
|
Article 18(1), first subparagraph |
Article 24(1) |
|
Article 18(1), second subparagraph |
Article 24(5) and (6) |
|
Article 18(1), third subparagraph |
Article 24(2), second subparagraph |
|
— |
Article 24(2), first and third subparagraphs |
|
— |
Article 24(5) and (6) |
|
Article 18(2) |
Article 24(3) |
|
Article 18(3) |
Article 24(4) |
|
Article 19 |
— |
|
— |
Article 16 |
|
Article 20(1) |
Article 17(1) |
|
Article 20(2) |
Article 15(3) |
|
— |
Article 17(2) |
|
— |
Article 17(2), point (a) |
|
Article 20(3), first subparagraph |
Article 17(2), point (b) |
|
— |
Article 17(2), points (c) and (d) |
|
Article 20(3), second subparagraph |
Article 17(3) |
|
Article 20(3), third subparagraph |
Article 19(2) |
|
Article 20(4) |
— |
|
Article 21(1) |
Article 19(1) |
|
Article 21(2) |
— |
|
Article 21(3) |
Article 19(2) |
|
Article 21(4) |
Article 19(4) |
|
Article 21(5) |
Article 19(5) |
|
— |
Article 19(3) |
|
Article 22(1) |
Article 15(1) |
|
— |
Article 15(2) and (4) |
|
Article 22(2) |
Article 19(1) |
|
Article 23(1) |
Article 18(1) and (2) |
|
Article 23(2) |
Article 18(3) |
|
Article 23(3), first subparagraph |
Article 13(4) |
|
Article 23(3), second subparagraph |
Article 13(13), third subparagraph |
|
Article 23(4), first subparagraph |
— |
|
Article 23(4), second subparagraph |
Article 13(12) |
|
Article 23(4), third subparagraph |
Article 13(13), second subparagraph |
|
Article 24(1) |
Article 20(1) |
|
Article 24(2) |
Article 20(1) |
|
— |
Article 20(2), (4) and (5) |
|
— |
Article 20(3), first subparagraph |
|
Article 24(3) |
Article 21(1) and (2) |
|
Article 24(4) |
Article 20(3), second subparagraph |
|
— |
Article 23(1) |
|
— |
Article 23(2), fourth subparagraph |
|
— |
Article 23(3) and (4) |
|
— |
Article 23(5), first subparagraph, points (b) and (c), and second subparagraph |
|
— |
Article 23(6) and (7) |
|
Article 25(1), first subparagraph, point (a) |
Article 23(2), first subparagraph, points (a) and (b), and second subparagraph, Article 23(5), first subparagraph, point (a), and Article 23(9) |
|
Article 25(1), first subparagraph, point (b) |
Article 23(8) |
|
Article 25(1), second subparagraph |
Article 23(8), third subparagraph |
|
— |
Article 23(10) |
|
Article 25(2) |
Article 23(2), third subparagraph |
|
— |
Article 22(2) and (3) |
|
Article 25(3), point (a) |
Article 22(3), second subparagraph |
|
Article 25(3), point (b) |
Article 23(5) |
|
Article 25(4) |
— |
|
Article 25(5) |
Article 25 |
|
Article 25(5), first subparagraph |
Article 25(1) and (3) |
|
Article 25(5), second subparagraph |
Article 25(4) |
|
Article 25(5), third subparagraph, point (a) |
Article 25(4) |
|
Article 25(5), third subparagraph, point (b) |
Article 25(5) |
|
Article 25(5), third subparagraph, point (c) |
— |
|
Article 25(5), fourth subparagraph |
Article 25(6) |
|
— |
Article 25(7) |
|
Article 25(6), first subparagraph |
Article 22(1) |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (a) |
Article 42(3) |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(i) |
Article 42(3), point (a) |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(ii) |
Article 42(3), point (c) |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(iii) |
Article 42(3), point (b) |
|
— |
Article 42(3), points (d) and (e) |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (b) |
Article 53(1) |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (b)(i) |
— |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (b)(ii) |
— |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (b)(iii) |
Article 53(1) |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (b)(iv) |
— |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (b)(v) |
— |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (b)(vi) |
— |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (b), second sentence |
— |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (c) |
Article 59(5) and (6) |
|
Article 25(6), second subparagraph, point (d) |
— |
|
Article 26 |
— |
|
Article 27(1) |
Article 40(1) and (3) |
|
— |
Article 40(2) and (4) |
|
Article 27(2) |
— |
|
Article 28(1), first subparagraph |
Article 41(5) |
|
Articler 28(1), second subparagraph, point (a) |
Article 41(1), point (d) |
|
Articler 28(1), second subparagraph, point (b) |
Article 41(1), points (e) and (f) |
|
— |
Article 41(1), points (a), (b) and (c) |
|
Article 28(1), third subparagraph |
— |
|
— |
Article 41(2), (3) and (4) |
|
Article 28(2) |
— |
|
Article 28(3) |
— |
|
Article 29 |
Article 6 |
|
Article 30 |
Article 7(2) |
|
Article 31(1) |
Article 34(1) |
|
— |
Article 34(2) |
|
— |
Article 34(3) |
|
— |
Article 34(4) |
|
— |
Article 35 |
|
— |
Article 35(1) |
|
— |
Article 35(2) |
|
— |
Article 35(3) |
|
Article 31(2) |
Article 35(4) |
|
Article 31(3), first subparagraph |
Article 35(4) |
|
Article 31(3), second subparagraph |
Article 35(5) |
|
Article 31(3), third subparagraph, point (a) |
Article 35(5), point (b) |
|
Article 31(3), third subparagraph, point (b) |
Article 35(5), point (a) |
|
Article 31(3), third subparagraph, point (c) |
Article 35(5), point (c) |
|
Article 31(3), fourth subparagraph |
— |
|
Article 31(4) |
Article 35(7) |
|
Article 31(5) |
Article 35(7), second subparagraph |
|
Article 31(6) |
— |
|
Article 31(7) |
Article 34(5) |
|
Article 31(8) |
Article 42(1) |
|
Article 31(8), point (a) |
Article 42(1), point (a) |
|
Article 31(8), point (b) |
Article 42(1), point (e) |
|
Article 31(8), point (c) |
Article 42(1), point (c) |
|
Article 31(8), point (d) |
— |
|
Article 31(8), point (e) |
Article 42(1), point (b) |
|
Article 31(8), point (f) |
Article 42(1), point (g) |
|
Article 31(8), point (g) |
Article 42(1), point (d) |
|
Article 31(8), point (h) |
Article 42(1), point (h) |
|
Article 31(8), point (i) |
— |
|
Article 31(8), point (j) |
Article 42(1), point (f) |
|
— |
Article 42(1), point (i) |
|
— |
Article 42(1), point (j) |
|
Article 31(9) |
Article 35(3) |
|
— |
Article 42(2) |
|
— |
Article 42(3) |
|
— |
Article 42(4) |
|
Article 32(1) |
Article 39(3) |
|
Article 32(2) |
Article 39(4) |
|
Article 33(1) |
Article 39(1) |
|
Article 33(2) |
Article 38(1) |
|
Article 33(2), point (a) |
Article 38(1), point (c) |
|
Article 33(2), point (b) |
Article 38(1), point (a) |
|
Article 33(2), point (c) |
Article 38(1), point (b) |
|
Article 33(2), point (d) |
Article 38(2) |
|
Article 33(2), point (e) |
— |
|
— |
Article 38(1), point (d) |
|
— |
Article 38(1), point (e) |
|
Article 34(1) |
Articles 11(1) |
|
Article 34(2) |
Article 13(6) |
|
— |
Article 57 |
|
Article 35, first paragraph |
Article 58(1) |
|
Article 35, second paragraph |
Article 58(2) |
|
— |
Article 58(3) |
|
— |
Article 58(4) |
|
— |
Article 58(5) |
|
— |
Article 60 |
|
Article 36(1) |
Article 61(5) |
|
— |
Article 61(1) |
|
— |
Article 61(2) |
|
— |
Article 61(3) |
|
— |
Article 61(4) |
|
Article 36(2) |
— |
|
— |
Article 62 |
|
— |
Article 63 |
|
Article 37(1) |
Article 64(1) |
|
Article 37(2) |
— |
|
Article 37(3) |
— |
|
— |
Article 64(2) |
|
— |
Article 64(3) |
|
Article 37(4) |
Article 64(4) |
|
Article 38(1) |
Article 59(1) |
|
— |
Article 59(2) |
|
— |
Article 59(3) |
|
Article 38(2), point (a) |
Article 59(5), point (b) |
|
— |
Article 59(4) |
|
Article 38(2), point (b) |
— |
|
Article 38(2), point (c) |
Article 59(5) |
|
— |
Article 59(6) |
|
— |
Article 59(7) |
|
Article 38(3) |
Article 59(8) |
|
Article 38(4) |
Article 59(9) |
|
Article 38(5) |
Article 64(4) |
|
Article 39 |
— |
|
Article 40(1) |
Article 55(1) |
|
— |
Article 55(2) |
|
Article 40(2) |
Article 55(3) |
|
Article 40(3) |
Article 55(3), point (a) |
|
— |
Article 55(3), point (b) |
|
— |
Article 55(4) |
|
Article 40(4) |
Article 55(5) |
|
— |
Article 55(6) |
|
Article 40(5) |
Article 55(7) |
|
Article 40(6) |
— |
|
Article 40(7) |
— |
|
Article 41 |
Article 56 |
|
Article 41(1), first subparagraph, point (a) |
Article 56, point (a) |
|
Article 41(1), first subparagraph, point (b) |
Article 56, point (b) |
|
Article 41(1), second subparagraph |
Article 56, first sentence |
|
Article 41(2) |
— |
|
Article 42 |
— |
|
Article 42(1) |
Article 55(4) |
|
Article 42(2), first subparagraph, point (a) |
— |
|
Article 42(2), first subparagraph, point (b) |
Article 55(4) |
|
Article 42(2), second subparagraph |
— |
|
Article 42(3) |
— |
|
Article 43 |
Articles 43 to 54 |
|
Article 44 |
Article 65 |
|
Article 45 |
Article 66 |
|
Article 45(1) |
Article 66(1) |
|
Article 45(2) |
Article 66(2) |
|
Article 45(3) |
Article 66(3) |
|
Article 45(4) |
Article 66(4) |
|
— |
Article 66(5) |
|
Article 45(5) |
Article 66(6) |
|
Article 46 |
Article 67 |
|
Article 46(1) |
Article 67(1) |
|
Article 46(1), point (a)(i) |
Article 67(1), point (b) |
|
Article 46(1), point (a)(ii) |
Article 67(1), point (a) |
|
Article 46(1), point (a)(iii) |
— |
|
Article 46(1), point (a)(iv) |
— |
|
Article 46(1), point (b) |
— |
|
Article 46(1), point (c) |
Article 67(1), point (d) |
|
Article 46(2), first subparagraph |
Article 67(2) |
|
Article 46(2), second subparagraph |
— |
|
Article 46(3) |
Article 67(3) |
|
— |
Article 67(4) |
|
— |
Article 67(5) |
|
Article 46(4), first subparagraph |
— |
|
— |
Article 67(6) |
|
Article 46(4), second subparagraph |
— |
|
— |
Article 68 |
|
— |
Article 68(1) |
|
Article 46(5) |
Article 68(2) |
|
Article 46(6) |
Article 68(3) and (4) |
|
Article 46(6), point (a) |
Article 68(3), point (a)(i) and (ii) |
|
Article 46(6), point (b) |
Article 68(3), point (b) |
|
Article 46(6), point (c) |
— |
|
Article 46(6), point (d) |
— |
|
— |
Article 68(3), points (c) and (e) |
|
Article 46(7) |
Article 68(4) and (5) |
|
Article 46(8) |
Article 68(5), point (d)(i) and (ii) |
|
Article 46(9) |
— |
|
Article 46(10) |
Article 69 |
|
Article 46(11) |
— |
|
Article 47 |
Article 70 |
|
Article 48 |
Article 7(1) |
|
Article 49 |
Article 71 |
|
— |
Article 72 |
|
— |
Article 73 |
|
— |
Article 74 |
|
— |
Article 75 |
|
— |
Article 76 |
|
Article 50 |
Article 77 |
|
Article 51 |
— |
|
Article 52 |
— |
|
Article 53 |
Article 78 |
|
Article 54 |
Article 79 |
|
Article 55 |
— |
ANNEX II
The following third countries are designated as safe countries of origin at Union level:
( ) Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p. 1).
( ) OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
( ) Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status (OJ L 326, 13.12.2005, p. 13).
( 1 ) This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.