EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32017D1442
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 of 31 July 2017 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants (notified under document C(2017) 5225) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 of 31 July 2017 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants (notified under document C(2017) 5225) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 of 31 July 2017 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants (notified under document C(2017) 5225) (Text with EEA relevance. )
C/2017/5225
OJ L 212, 17.8.2017, p. 1–82
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
In force
|
17.8.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 212/1 |
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2017/1442
of 31 July 2017
establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants
(notified under document C(2017) 5225)
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (1), and in partiular Article 13(5) thereof,
Whereas:
|
(1) |
Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions are the reference for setting permit conditions for installations covered by Chapter II of Directive 2010/75/EU and competent authorities should set emission limit values which ensure that, under normal operating conditions, emissions do not exceed the emission levels associated with the best available techniques as laid down in the BAT conclusions. |
|
(2) |
The forum composed of representatives of Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection, established by Commission Decision of 16 May 2011 (2), provided the Commission on 20 October 2016 with its opinion on the proposed content of the BAT reference document for large combustion plants. That opinion is publicly available. |
|
(3) |
The BAT conclusions set out in the Annex to this Decision are the key element of that BAT reference document. |
|
(4) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 75(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The best available techniques (BAT) conclusions for large combustion plants, as set out in the Annex, are adopted.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 31 July 2017.
For the Commission
Karmenu VELLA
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.
(2) OJ C 146, 17.5.2011, p. 3.
ANNEX
BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES (BAT) CONCLUSIONS
SCOPE
These BAT conclusions concern the following activities specified in Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU:
|
— |
1.1: Combustion of fuels in installations with a total rated thermal input of 50 MW or more, only when this activity takes place in combustion plants with a total rated thermal input of 50 MW or more. |
|
— |
1.4: Gasification of coal or other fuels in installations with a total rated thermal input of 20 MW or more, only when this activity is directly associated to a combustion plant. |
|
— |
5.2: Disposal or recovery of waste in waste co-incineration plants for non-hazardous waste with a capacity exceeding 3 tonnes per hour or for hazardous waste with a capacity exceeding 10 tonnes per day, only when this activity takes place in combustion plants covered under 1.1 above. |
In particular, these BAT conclusions cover upstream and downstream activities directly associated with the aforementioned activities including the emission prevention and control techniques applied.
The fuels considered in these BAT conclusions are any solid, liquid and/or gaseous combustible material including:
|
— |
solid fuels (e.g. coal, lignite, peat), |
|
— |
biomass (as defined in Article 3(31) of Directive 2010/75/EU), |
|
— |
liquid fuels (e.g. heavy fuel oil and gas oil), |
|
— |
gaseous fuels (e.g. natural gas, hydrogen-containing gas and syngas), |
|
— |
industry-specific fuels (e.g. by-products from the chemical and iron and steel industries), |
|
— |
waste except mixed municipal waste as defined in Article 3(39) and except other waste listed in Article 42(2)(a)(ii) and (iii) of Directive 2010/75/EU. |
These BAT conclusions do not address the following:
|
— |
combustion of fuels in units with a rated thermal input of less than 15 MW, |
|
— |
combustion plants benefitting from the limited life time or district heating derogation as set out in Articles 33 and 35 of Directive 2010/75/EU, until the derogations set in their permits expire, for what concerns the BAT-AELs for the pollutants covered by the derogation, as well as for other pollutants whose emissions would have been reduced by the technical measures obviated by the derogation, |
|
— |
gasification of fuels, when not directly associated to the combustion of the resulting syngas, |
|
— |
gasification of fuels and subsequent combustion of syngas when directly associated to the refining of mineral oil and gas, |
|
— |
the upstream and downstream activities not directly associated to combustion or gasification activities, |
|
— |
combustion in process furnaces or heaters, |
|
— |
combustion in post-combustion plants, |
|
— |
flaring, |
|
— |
combustion in recovery boilers and total reduced sulphur burners within installations for the production of pulp and paper, as this is covered by the BAT conclusions for the production of pulp, paper and board, |
|
— |
combustion of refinery fuels at the refinery site, as this is covered by the BAT conclusions for the refining of mineral oil and gas, |
|
— |
disposal or recovery of waste in:
as this is covered by the BAT conclusions for waste incineration. |
Other BAT conclusions and reference documents that could be relevant for the activities covered by these BAT conclusions are the following:
|
— |
Common Waste Water and Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical Sector (CWW) |
|
— |
Chemical BREF series (LVOC, etc.) |
|
— |
Economics and Cross-Media Effects (ECM) |
|
— |
Emissions from Storage (EFS) |
|
— |
Energy Efficiency (ENE) |
|
— |
Industrial Cooling Systems (ICS) |
|
— |
Iron and Steel Production (IS) |
|
— |
Monitoring of Emissions to Air and Water from IED installations (ROM) |
|
— |
Production of Pulp, Paper and Board (PP) |
|
— |
Refining of Mineral Oil and Gas (REF) |
|
— |
Waste Incineration (WI) |
|
— |
Waste Treatment (WT) |
DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of these BAT conclusions, the following definitions apply:
|
Term used |
Definition |
||||
|
General terms |
|||||
|
Boiler |
Any combustion plant with the exception of engines, gas turbines, and process furnaces or heaters |
||||
|
Combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) |
A CCGT is a combustion plant where two thermodynamic cycles are used (i.e. Brayton and Rankine cycles). In a CCGT, heat from the flue-gas of a gas turbine (operating according to the Brayton cycle to produce electricity) is converted to useful energy in a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG), where it is used to generate steam, which then expands in a steam turbine (operating according to the Rankine cycle to produce additional electricity). For the purpose of these BAT conclusions, a CCGT includes configurations both with and without supplementary firing of the HRSG |
||||
|
Combustion plant |
Any technical apparatus in which fuels are oxidised in order to use the heat thus generated. For the purposes of these BAT conclusions, a combination formed of:
is considered as a single combustion plant. For calculating the total rated thermal input of such a combination, the capacities of all individual combustion plants concerned, which have a rated thermal input of at least 15 MW, shall be added together |
||||
|
Combustion unit |
Individual combustion plant |
||||
|
Continuous measurement |
Measurement using an automated measuring system permanently installed on site |
||||
|
Direct discharge |
Discharge (to a receiving water body) at the point where the emission leaves the installation without further downstream treatment |
||||
|
Flue-gas desulphurisation (FGD) system |
System composed of one or a combination of abatement technique(s) whose purpose is to reduce the level of SOX emitted by a combustion plant |
||||
|
Flue-gas desulphurisation (FGD) system — existing |
A flue-gas desulphurisation (FGD) system that is not a new FGD system |
||||
|
Flue-gas desulphurisation (FGD) system — new |
Either a flue-gas desulphurisation (FGD) system in a new plant or a FGD system that includes at least one abatement technique introduced or completely replaced in an existing plant following the publication of these BAT conclusions |
||||
|
Gas oil |
Any petroleum-derived liquid fuel falling within CN code 2710 19 25 , 2710 19 29 , 2710 19 47 , 2710 19 48 , 2710 20 17 or 2710 20 19 . Or any petroleum-derived liquid fuel of which less than 65 vol-% (including losses) distils at 250 °C and of which at least 85 vol-% (including losses) distils at 350 °C by the ASTM D86 method |
||||
|
Heavy fuel oil (HFO) |
Any petroleum-derived liquid fuel falling within CN code 2710 19 51 to 2710 19 68 , 2710 20 31 , 2710 20 35 , 2710 20 39 . Or any petroleum-derived liquid fuel, other than gas oil, which, by reason of its distillation limits, falls within the category of heavy oils intended for use as fuel and of which less than 65 vol-% (including losses) distils at 250 °C by the ASTM D86 method. If the distillation cannot be determined by the ASTM D86 method, the petroleum product is also categorised as a heavy fuel oil |
||||
|
Net electrical efficiency (combustion unit and IGCC) |
Ratio between the net electrical output (electricity produced on the high-voltage side of the main transformer minus the imported energy — e.g. for auxiliary systems' consumption) and the fuel/feedstock energy input (as the fuel/feedstock lower heating value) at the combustion unit boundary over a given period of time |
||||
|
Net mechanical energy efficiency |
Ratio between the mechanical power at load coupling and the thermal power supplied by the fuel |
||||
|
Net total fuel utilisation (combustion unit and IGCC) |
Ratio between the net produced energy (electricity, hot water, steam, mechanical energy produced minus the imported electrical and/or thermal energy (e.g. for auxiliary systems' consumption)) and the fuel energy input (as the fuel lower heating value) at the combustion unit boundary over a given period of time |
||||
|
Net total fuel utilisation (gasification unit) |
Ratio between the net produced energy (electricity, hot water, steam, mechanical energy produced, and syngas (as the syngas lower heating value) minus the imported electrical and/or thermal energy (e.g. for auxiliary systems' consumption)) and the fuel/feedstock energy input (as the fuel/feedstock lower heating value) at the gasification unit boundary over a given period of time |
||||
|
Operated hours |
The time, expressed in hours, during which a combustion plant, in whole or in part, is operated and is discharging emissions to air, excluding start-up and shutdown periods |
||||
|
Periodic measurement |
Determination of a measurand (a particular quantity subject to measurement) at specified time intervals |
||||
|
Plant — existing |
A combustion plant that is not a new plant |
||||
|
Plant — new |
A combustion plant first permitted at the installation following the publication of these BAT conclusions or a complete replacement of a combustion plant on the existing foundations following the publication of these BAT conclusions |
||||
|
Post-combustion plant |
System designed to purify the flue-gases by combustion which is not operated as an independent combustion plant, such as a thermal oxidiser (i.e. tail gas incinerator), used for the removal of the pollutant(s) (e.g. VOC) content from the flue-gas with or without the recovery of the heat generated therein. Staged combustion techniques, where each combustion stage is confined within a separate chamber, which may have distinct combustion process characteristics (e.g. fuel to air ratio, temperature profile), are considered integrated in the combustion process and are not considered post-combustion plants. Similarly, when gases generated in a process heater/furnace or in another combustion process are subsequently oxidised in a distinct combustion plant to recover their energetic value (with or without the use of auxiliary fuel) to produce electricity, steam, hot water/oil or mechanical energy, the latter plant is not considered a post-combustion plant |
||||
|
Predictive emissions monitoring system (PEMS) |
System used to determine the emissions concentration of a pollutant from an emission source on a continuous basis, based on its relationship with a number of characteristic continuously monitored process parameters (e.g. the fuel gas consumption, the air to fuel ratio) and fuel or feed quality data (e.g. the sulphur content) |
||||
|
Process fuels from the chemical industry |
Gaseous and/or liquid by-products generated by the (petro-)chemical industry and used as non-commercial fuels in combustion plants |
||||
|
Process furnaces or heaters |
Process furnaces or heaters are:
As a consequence of the application of good energy recovery practices, process heaters/furnaces may have an associated steam/electricity generation system. This is considered to be an integral design feature of the process heater/furnace that cannot be considered in isolation |
||||
|
Refinery fuels |
Solid, liquid or gaseous combustible material from the distillation and conversion steps of the refining of crude oil. Examples are refinery fuel gas (RFG), syngas, refinery oils, and pet coke |
||||
|
Residues |
Substances or objects generated by the activities covered by the scope of this document, as waste or by-products |
||||
|
Start-up and shut-down period |
The time period of plant operation as determined pursuant to the provisions of Commission Implementing Decision 2012/249/EU (*1) |
||||
|
Unit — existing |
A combustion unit that is not a new unit |
||||
|
Unit- new |
A combustion unit first permitted at the combustion plant following the publication of these BAT conclusions or a complete replacement of a combustion unit on the existing foundations of the combustion plant following the publication of these BAT conclusions |
||||
|
Valid (hourly average) |
An hourly average is considered valid when there is no maintenance or malfunction of the automated measuring system |
||||
|
Term used |
Definition |
|
Pollutants/parameters |
|
|
As |
The sum of arsenic and its compounds, expressed as As |
|
C3 |
Hydrocarbons having a carbon number equal to three |
|
C4+ |
Hydrocarbons having a carbon number of four or greater |
|
Cd |
The sum of cadmium and its compounds, expressed as Cd |
|
Cd+Tl |
The sum of cadmium, thallium and their compounds, expressed as Cd+Tl |
|
CH4 |
Methane |
|
CO |
Carbon monoxide |
|
COD |
Chemical oxygen demand. Amount of oxygen needed for the total oxidation of the organic matter to carbon dioxide |
|
COS |
Carbonyl sulphide |
|
Cr |
The sum of chromium and its compounds, expressed as Cr |
|
Cu |
The sum of copper and its compounds, expressed as Cu |
|
Dust |
Total particulate matter (in air) |
|
Fluoride |
Dissolved fluoride, expressed as F– |
|
H2S |
Hydrogen sulphide |
|
HCl |
All inorganic gaseous chlorine compounds, expressed as HCl |
|
HCN |
Hydrogen cyanide |
|
HF |
All inorganic gaseous fluorine compounds, expressed as HF |
|
Hg |
The sum of mercury and its compounds, expressed as Hg |
|
N2O |
Dinitrogen monoxide (nitrous oxide) |
|
NH3 |
Ammonia |
|
Ni |
The sum of nickel and its compounds, expressed as Ni |
|
NOX |
The sum of nitrogen monoxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), expressed as NO2 |
|
Pb |
The sum of lead and its compounds, expressed as Pb |
|
PCDD/F |
Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and -furans |
|
RCG |
Raw concentration in the flue-gas. Concentration of SO2 in the raw flue-gas as a yearly average (under the standard conditions given under General considerations) at the inlet of the SOX abatement system, expressed at a reference oxygen content of 6 vol-% O2 |
|
Sb + As + Pb + Cr + Co + Cu + Mn + Ni + V |
The sum of antimony, arsenic, lead, chromium, cobalt, copper, manganese, nickel, vanadium and their compounds, expressed as Sb + As + Pb + Cr + Co + Cu + Mn + Ni + V |
|
SO2 |
Sulphur dioxide |
|
SO3 |
Sulphur trioxide |
|
SOX |
The sum of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and sulphur trioxide (SO3), expressed as SO2 |
|
Sulphate |
Dissolved sulphate, expressed as SO4 2– |
|
Sulphide, easily released |
The sum of dissolved sulphide and of those undissolved sulphides that are easily released upon acidification, expressed as S2– |
|
Sulphite |
Dissolved sulphite, expressed as SO3 2– |
|
TOC |
Total organic carbon, expressed as C (in water) |
|
TSS |
Total suspended solids. Mass concentration of all suspended solids (in water), measured via filtration through glass fibre filters and gravimetry |
|
TVOC |
Total volatile organic carbon, expressed as C (in air) |
|
Zn |
The sum of zinc and its compounds, expressed as Zn |
ACRONYMS
For the purposes of these BAT conclusions, the following acronyms apply:
|
Acronym |
Definition |
|
ASU |
Air supply unit |
|
CCGT |
Combined-cycle gas turbine, with or without supplementary firing |
|
CFB |
Circulating fluidised bed |
|
CHP |
Combined heat and power |
|
COG |
Coke oven gas |
|
COS |
Carbonyl sulphide |
|
DLN |
Dry low-NOX burners |
|
DSI |
Duct sorbent injection |
|
ESP |
Electrostatic precipitator |
|
FBC |
Fluidised bed combustion |
|
FGD |
Flue-gas desulphurisation |
|
HFO |
Heavy fuel oil |
|
HRSG |
Heat recovery steam generator |
|
IGCC |
Integrated gasification combined cycle |
|
LHV |
Lower heating value |
|
LNB |
Low-NOX burners |
|
LNG |
Liquefied natural gas |
|
OCGT |
Open-cycle gas turbine |
|
OTNOC |
Other than normal operating conditions |
|
PC |
Pulverised combustion |
|
PEMS |
Predictive emissions monitoring system |
|
SCR |
Selective catalytic reduction |
|
SDA |
Spray dry absorber |
|
SNCR |
Selective non-catalytic reduction |
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Best Available Techniques
The techniques listed and described in these BAT conclusions are neither prescriptive nor exhaustive. Other techniques may be used that ensure at least an equivalent level of environmental protection.
Unless otherwise stated, these BAT conclusions are generally applicable.
Emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs)
Where emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) are given for different averaging periods, all of those BAT-AELs have to be complied with.
The BAT-AELs set out in these BAT conclusions may not apply to liquid-fuel-fired and gas-fired turbines and engines for emergency use operated less than 500 h/yr, when such emergency use is not compatible with meeting the BAT-AELs.
BAT-AELs for emissions to air
Emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) for emissions to air given in these BAT conclusions refer to concentrations, expressed as mass of emitted substance per volume of flue-gas under the following standard conditions: dry gas at a temperature of 273,15 K, and a pressure of 101,3 kPa, and expressed in the units mg/Nm3, μg/Nm3 or ng I-TEQ/Nm3.
The monitoring associated with the BAT-AELs for emissions to air is given in BAT 4
Reference conditions for oxygen used to express BAT-AELs in this document are shown in the table given below.
|
Activity |
Reference oxygen level (OR) |
|
Combustion of solid fuels |
6 vol-% |
|
Combustion of solid fuels in combination with liquid and/or gaseous fuels |
|
|
Waste co-incineration |
|
|
Combustion of liquid and/or gaseous fuels when not taking place in a gas turbine or an engine |
3 vol-% |
|
Combustion of liquid and/or gaseous fuels when taking place in a gas turbine or an engine |
15 vol-% |
|
Combustion in IGCC plants |
The equation for calculating the emission concentration at the reference oxygen level is:
Where:
|
ER |
: |
emission concentration at the reference oxygen level OR; |
|
OR |
: |
reference oxygen level in vol- %; |
|
EM |
: |
measured emission concentration; |
|
OM |
: |
measured oxygen level in vol- %. |
For averaging periods, the following definitions apply:
|
Averaging period |
Definition |
|
Daily average |
Average over a period of 24 hours of valid hourly averages obtained by continuous measurements |
|
Yearly average |
Average over a period of one year of valid hourly averages obtained by continuous measurements |
|
Average over the sampling period |
Average value of three consecutive measurements of at least 30 minutes each (1) |
|
Average of samples obtained during one year |
Average of the values obtained during one year of the periodic measurements taken with the monitoring frequency set for each parameter |
BAT-AELs for emissions to water
Emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) for emissions to water given in these BAT conclusions refer to concentrations, expressed as mass of emitted substance per volume of water, and expressed in μg/l, mg/l, or g/l. The BAT-AELs refer to daily averages, i.e. 24-hour flow-proportional composite samples. Time-proportional composite samples can be used provided that sufficient flow stability can be demonstrated.
The monitoring associated with BAT-AELs for emissions to water is given in BAT 5
Energy efficiency levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AEELs)
An energy efficiency level associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AEEL) refers to the ratio between the combustion unit's net energy output(s) and the combustion unit's fuel/feedstock energy input at actual unit design. The net energy output(s) is determined at the combustion, gasification, or IGCC unit boundaries, including auxiliary systems (e.g. flue-gas treatment systems), and for the unit operated at full load.
In the case of combined heat and power (CHP) plants:
|
— |
the net total fuel utilisation BAT-AEEL refers to the combustion unit operated at full load and tuned to maximise primarily the heat supply and secondarily the remaining power that can be generated, |
|
— |
the net electrical efficiency BAT-AEEL refers to the combustion unit generating only electricity at full load. |
BAT-AEELs are expressed as a percentage. The fuel/feedstock energy input is expressed as lower heating value (LHV).
The monitoring associated with BAT-AEELs is given in BAT 2
Categorisation of combustion plants/units according to their total rated thermal input
For the purposes of these BAT conclusions, when a range of values for the total rated thermal input is indicated, this is to be read as ‘equal to or greater than the lower end of the range and lower than the upper end of the range’. For example, the plant category 100–300 MWth is to be read as: combustion plants with a total rated thermal input equal to or greater than 100 MW and lower than 300 MW.
When a part of a combustion plant discharging flue-gases through one or more separate ducts within a common stack is operated less than 1 500 h/yr, that part of the plant may be considered separately for the purpose of these BAT conclusions. For all parts of the plant, the BAT-AELs apply in relation to the total rated thermal input of the plant. In such cases, the emissions through each of those ducts are monitored separately.
1. GENERAL BAT CONCLUSIONS
The fuel-specific BAT conclusions included in Sections 2 to 7 apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions in this section.
1.1. Environmental management systems
|
BAT 1. |
In order to improve the overall environmental performance, BAT is to implement and adhere to an environmental management system (EMS) that incorporates all of the following features:
Where an assessment shows that any of the elements listed under items x to xvi are not necessary, a record is made of the decision, including the reasons. |
Applicability
The scope (e.g. level of detail) and nature of the EMS (e.g. standardised or non-standardised) is generally related to the nature, scale and complexity of the installation, and the range of environmental impacts it may have.
1.2. Monitoring
|
BAT 2. |
BAT is to determine the net electrical efficiency and/or the net total fuel utilisation and/or the net mechanical energy efficiency of the gasification, IGCC and/or combustion units by carrying out a performance test at full load (2), according to EN standards, after the commissioning of the unit and after each modification that could significantly affect the net electrical efficiency and/or the net total fuel utilisation and/or the net mechanical energy efficiency of the unit. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality. |
|
BAT 3. |
BAT is to monitor key process parameters relevant for emissions to air and water including those given below.
|
|
BAT 4. |
BAT is to monitor emissions to air with at least the frequency given below and in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality.
|
|
BAT 5. |
BAT is to monitor emissions to water from flue-gas treatment with at least the frequency given below and in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.3. General environmental and combustion performance
|
BAT 6. |
In order to improve the general environmental performance of combustion plants and to reduce emissions to air of CO and unburnt substances, BAT is to ensure optimised combustion and to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT 7. |
In order to reduce emissions of ammonia to air from the use of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and/or selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) for the abatement of NOX emissions, BAT is to optimise the design and/or operation of SCR and/or SNCR (e.g. optimised reagent to NOX ratio, homogeneous reagent distribution and optimum size of the reagent drops). BAT-associated emission levels The BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for emissions of NH3 to air from the use of SCR and/or SNCR is < 3–10 mg/Nm3 as a yearly average or average over the sampling period. The lower end of the range can be achieved when using SCR and the upper end of the range can be achieved when using SNCR without wet abatement techniques. In the case of plants combusting biomass and operating at variable loads as well as in the case of engines combusting HFO and/or gas oil, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 15 mg/Nm3. |
|
BAT 8. |
In order to prevent or reduce emissions to air during normal operating conditions, BAT is to ensure, by appropriate design, operation and maintenance, that the emission abatement systems are used at optimal capacity and availability. |
|
BAT 9. |
In order to improve the general environmental performance of combustion and/or gasification plants and to reduce emissions to air, BAT is to include the following elements in the quality assurance/quality control programmes for all the fuels used, as part of the environmental management system (see BAT 1):
Description Initial characterisation and regular testing of the fuel can be performed by the operator and/or the fuel supplier. If performed by the supplier, the full results are provided to the operator in the form of a product (fuel) supplier specification and/or guarantee.
|
|
BAT 10. |
In order to reduce emissions to air and/or to water during other than normal operating conditions (OTNOC), BAT is to set up and implement a management plan as part of the environmental management system (see BAT 1), commensurate with the relevance of potential pollutant releases, that includes the following elements:
|
|
BAT 11. |
BAT is to appropriately monitor emissions to air and/or to water during OTNOC. Description The monitoring can be carried out by direct measurement of emissions or by monitoring of surrogate parameters if this proves to be of equal or better scientific quality than the direct measurement of emissions. Emissions during start-up and shutdown (SU/SD) may be assessed based on a detailed emission measurement carried out for a typical SU/SD procedure at least once every year, and using the results of this measurement to estimate the emissions for each and every SU/SD throughout the year. |
1.4. Energy efficiency
|
BAT 12. |
In order to increase the energy efficiency of combustion, gasification and/or IGCC units operated ≥ 1 500 h/yr, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.5. Water usage and emissions to water
|
BAT 13. |
In order to reduce water usage and the volume of contaminated waste water discharged, BAT is to use one or both of the techniques given below.
|
|||||||||||||
|
BAT 14. |
In order to prevent the contamination of uncontaminated waste water and to reduce emissions to water, BAT is to segregate waste water streams and to treat them separately, depending on the pollutant content. Description Waste water streams that are typically segregated and treated include surface run-off water, cooling water, and waste water from flue-gas treatment. Applicability The applicability may be restricted in the case of existing plants due to the configuration of the drainage systems. |
|
BAT 15. |
In order to reduce emissions to water from flue-gas treatment, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given below, and to use secondary techniques as close as possible to the source in order to avoid dilution.
The BAT-AELs refer to direct discharges to a receiving water body at the point where the emission leaves the installation. Table 1 BAT-AELs for direct discharges to a receiving water body from flue-gas treatment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.6. Waste management
|
BAT 16. |
In order to reduce the quantity of waste sent for disposal from the combustion and/or gasification process and abatement techniques, BAT is to organise operations so as to maximise, in order of priority and taking into account life-cycle thinking:
by implementing an appropriate combination of techniques such as:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.7. Noise emissions
|
BAT 17. |
In order to reduce noise emissions, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR THE COMBUSTION OF SOLID FUELS
2.1. BAT conclusions for the combustion of coal and/or lignite
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section are generally applicable to the combustion of coal and/or lignite. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1.
2.1.1.
|
BAT 18. |
In order to improve the general environmental performance of the combustion of coal and/or lignite, and in addition to BAT 6, BAT is to use the technique given below.
|
|||||||||
2.1.2.
|
BAT 19. |
In order to increase the energy efficiency of the combustion of coal and/or lignite, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given in BAT 12 and below.
Table 2 BAT-associated energy efficiency levels (BAT-AEELs) for coal and/or lignite combustion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.3.
|
BAT 20. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air while limiting CO and N2O emissions to air from the combustion of coal and/or lignite, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 3 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for NOX emissions to air from the combustion of coal and/or lignite
As an indication, the yearly average CO emission levels for existing combustion plants operated ≥ 1 500 h/yr or for new combustion plants will generally be as follows:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.4.
|
BAT 21. |
In order to prevent or reduce SOX, HCl and HF emissions to air from the combustion of coal and/or lignite, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 4 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for SO2 emissions to air from the combustion of coal and/or lignite
For a combustion plant with a total rated thermal input of more than 300 MW, which is specifically designed to fire indigenous lignite fuels and which can demonstrate that it cannot achieve the BAT-AELs mentioned in Table 4 for techno-economic reasons, the daily average BAT-AELs set out in Table 4 do not apply, and the upper end of the yearly average BAT-AEL range is as follows:
Table 5 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for HCl and HF emissions to air from the combustion of coal and/or lignite
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.5.
|
BAT 22. |
In order to reduce dust and particulate-bound metal emissions to air from the combustion of coal and/or lignite, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 6 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for dust emissions to air from the combustion of coal and/or lignite
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.1.6.
|
BAT 23. |
In order to prevent or reduce mercury emissions to air from the combustion of coal and/or lignite, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 7 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for mercury emissions to air from the combustion of coal and lignite
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.2. BAT conclusions for the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section are generally applicable to the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1
2.2.1.
Table 8
BAT-associated energy efficiency levels (BAT-AEELs) for the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat
|
Type of combustion unit |
||||
|
Net electrical efficiency (%) (75) |
||||
|
New unit (78) |
Existing unit |
New unit |
Existing unit |
|
|
Solid biomass and/or peat boiler |
33,5–to > 38 |
28–38 |
73–99 |
73–99 |
2.2.2.
|
BAT 24. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air while limiting CO and N2O emissions to air from the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 9 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for NOX emissions to air from the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat
As an indication, the yearly average CO emission levels will generally be:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.2.3.
|
BAT 25. |
In order to prevent or reduce SOX, HCl and HF emissions to air from the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 10 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for SO2 emissions to air from the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat
Table 11 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for HCl and HF emissions to air from the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.2.4.
|
BAT 26. |
In order to reduce dust and particulate-bound metal emissions to air from the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 12 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for dust emissions to air from the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.2.5.
|
BAT 27. |
In order to prevent or reduce mercury emissions to air from the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
The BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for mercury emissions to air from the combustion of solid biomass and/or peat is < 1–5 μg/Nm3 as average over the sampling period. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR THE COMBUSTION OF LIQUID FUELS
The BAT conclusions presented in this section do not apply to combustion plants on offshore platforms; these are covered by Section 4.3
3.1. HFO- and/or gas-oil-fired boilers
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section are generally applicable to the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in boilers. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1
3.1.1.
Table 13
BAT-associated energy efficiency levels (BAT-AEELs) for HFO and/or gas oil combustion in boilers
|
Type of combustion unit |
||||
|
Net electrical efficiency (%) |
Net total fuel utilisation (%) (101) |
|||
|
New unit |
Existing unit |
New unit |
Existing unit |
|
|
HFO- and/or gas-oil-fired boiler |
> 36,4 |
35,6–37,4 |
80–96 |
80–96 |
3.1.2.
|
BAT 28. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air while limiting CO emissions to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in boilers, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 14 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for NOX emissions to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in boilers
As an indication, the yearly average CO emission levels will generally be:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.3.
|
BAT 29. |
In order to prevent or reduce SOX, HCl and HF emissions to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in boilers, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 15 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for SO2 emissions to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in boilers
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.1.4.
|
BAT 30. |
In order to reduce dust and particulate-bound metal emissions to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in boilers, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 16 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for dust emissions to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in boilers
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2. HFO- and/or gas-oil-fired engines
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section are generally applicable to the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in reciprocating engines. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1.
As regards HFO- and/or gas-oil-fired engines, secondary abatement techniques for NOX, SO2 and dust may not be applicable to engines in islands that are part of a small isolated system (117) or a micro isolated system (118), due to technical, economic and logistical/infrastructure constraints, pending their interconnection to the mainland electricity grid or access to a natural gas supply. The BAT-AELs for such engines shall therefore only apply in small isolated system and micro isolated system as from 1 January 2025 for new engines, and as from 1 January 2030 for existing engines.
3.2.1.
|
BAT 31. |
In order to increase the energy efficiency of HFO and/or gas oil combustion in reciprocating engines, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given in BAT 12 and below.
Table 17 BAT-associated energy efficiency levels (BAT-AEELs) for the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in reciprocating engines
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.2.
|
BAT 32. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in reciprocating engines, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT 33. |
In order to prevent or reduce emissions of CO and volatile organic compounds to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in reciprocating engines, BAT is to use one or both of the techniques given below.
Table 18 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for NOX emissions to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in reciprocating engines
As an indication, for existing combustion plants burning only HFO and operated ≥ 1 500 h/yr or new combustion plants burning only HFO,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.3.
|
BAT 34. |
In order to prevent or reduce SOX, HCl and HF emissions to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in reciprocating engines, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 19 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for SO2 emissions to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in reciprocating engines
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.2.4.
|
BAT 35. |
In order to prevent or reduce dust and particulate-bound metal emissions from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in reciprocating engines, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 20 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for dust emissions to air from the combustion of HFO and/or gas oil in reciprocating engines
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.3. Gas-oil-fired gas turbines
Unless stated otherwise, the BAT conclusions presented in this section are generally applicable to the combustion of gas oil in gas turbines. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1.
3.3.1.
|
BAT 36. |
In order to increase the energy efficiency of gas oil combustion in gas turbines, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given in BAT 12 and below.
Table 21 BAT-associated energy efficiency levels (BAT-AEELs) for gas-oil-fired gas turbines
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
3.3.2.
|
BAT 37. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air from the combustion of gas oil in gas turbines, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
BAT 38. |
In order to prevent or reduce CO emissions to air from the combustion of gas oil in gas turbines, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
|
||||||||||||
As an indication, the emission level for NOX emissions to air from the combustion of gas oil in dual fuel gas turbines for emergency use operated < 500 h/yr will generally be 145–250 mg/Nm3 as a daily average or average over the sampling period.
3.3.3.
|
BAT 39. |
In order to prevent or reduce SOX and dust emissions to air from the combustion of gas oil in gas turbines, BAT is to use the technique given below.
Table 22 BAT-associated emission levels for SO2 and dust emissions to air from the combustion of gas oil in gas turbines, including dual fuel gas turbines
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR THE COMBUSTION OF GASEOUS FUELS
4.1. BAT conclusions for the combustion of natural gas
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section are generally applicable to the combustion of natural gas. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1. They do not apply to combustion plants on offshore platforms; these are covered by Section. 4.3.
4.1.1.
|
BAT 40. |
In order to increase the energy efficiency of natural gas combustion, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given in BAT 12 and below.
Table 23 BAT-associated energy efficiency levels (BAT-AEELs) for the combustion of natural gas
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.1.2.
|
BAT 41. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air from the combustion of natural gas in boilers, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT 42. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air from the combustion of natural gas in gas turbines, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT 43. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air from the combustion of natural gas in engines, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT 44. |
In order to prevent or reduce CO emissions to air from the combustion of natural gas, BAT is to ensure optimised combustion and/or to use oxidation catalysts. Description See descriptions in Section 8.3. Table 24 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for NOX emissions to air from the combustion of natural gas in gas turbines
As an indication, the yearly average CO emission levels for each type of existing combustion plant operated ≥ 1 500 h/yr and for each type of new combustion plant will generally be as follows:
In the case of a gas turbine equipped with DLN burners, these indicative levels correspond to when the DLN operation is effective. Table 25 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for NOX emissions to air from the combustion of natural gas in boilers and engines
As an indication, the yearly average CO emission levels will generally be:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT 45. |
In order to reduce non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) and methane (CH4) emissions to air from the combustion of natural gas in spark-ignited lean-burn gas engines, BAT is to ensure optimised combustion and/or to use oxidation catalysts. Description See descriptions in Section 8.3. Oxidation catalysts are not effective at reducing the emissions of saturated hydrocarbons containing less than four carbon atoms. Table 26 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for formaldehyde and CH4 emissions to air from the combustion of natural gas in a spark-ignited lean-burn gas engine
|
||||||||||||||||||
4.2. BAT conclusions for the combustion of iron and steel process gases
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section are generally applicable to the combustion of iron and steel process gases (blast furnace gas, coke oven gas, basic oxygen furnace gas), individually, in combination, or simultaneously with other gaseous and/or liquid fuels. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1.
4.2.1.
|
BAT 46. |
In order to increase the energy efficiency of the combustion of iron and steel process gases, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given in BAT 12 and below.
Table 27 BAT-associated energy efficiency levels (BAT-AEELs) for the combustion of iron and steel process gases in boilers
Table 28 BAT-associated energy efficiency levels (BAT-AEELs) for the combustion of iron and steel process gases in CCGTs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.2.2.
|
BAT 47. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air from the combustion of iron and steel process gases in boilers, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT 48. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air from the combustion of iron and steel process gases in CCGTs, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT 49. |
In order to prevent or reduce CO emissions to air from the combustion of iron and steel process gases, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 29 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for NOX emissions to air from the combustion of 100 % iron and steel process gases
As an indication, the yearly average CO emission levels will generally be:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.2.3.
|
BAT 50. |
In order to prevent or reduce SOX emissions to air from the combustion of iron and steel process gases, BAT is to use a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 30 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for SO2 emissions to air from the combustion of 100 % iron and steel process gases
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.2.4.
|
BAT 51. |
In order to reduce dust emissions to air from the combustion of iron and steel process gases, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 31 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for dust emissions to air from the combustion of 100 % iron and steel process gases
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.3. BAT conclusions for the combustion of gaseous and/or liquid fuels on offshore platforms
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section are generally applicable to the combustion of gaseous and/or liquid fuels on offshore platforms. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1.
|
BAT 52. |
In order to improve the general environmental performance of the combustion of gaseous and/or liquid fuels on offshore platforms, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT 53. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air from the combustion of gaseous and/or liquid fuels on offshore platforms, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT 54. |
In order to prevent or reduce CO emissions to air from the combustion of gaseous and/or liquid fuels in gas turbines on offshore platforms, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 32 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for NOX emissions to air from the combustion of gaseous fuels in open-cycle gas turbines on offshore platforms
As an indication, the average CO emission levels over the sampling period will generally be:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
5. BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR MULTI-FUEL-FIRED PLANTS
5.1. BAT conclusions for the combustion of process fuels from the chemical industry
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section are generally applicable to the combustion of process fuels from the chemical industry, individually, in combination, or simultaneously with other gaseous and/or liquid fuels. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1.
5.1.1.
|
BAT 55. |
In order to improve the general environmental performance of the combustion of process fuels from the chemical industry in boilers, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given in BAT 6 and below.
|
|||||||||
5.1.2.
Table 33
BAT-associated energy efficiency levels (BAT-AEELs) for the combustion of process fuels from the chemical industry in boilers
|
Type of combustion unit |
||||
|
Net electrical efficiency (%) |
||||
|
New unit |
Existing unit |
New unit |
Existing unit |
|
|
Boiler using liquid process fuels from the chemical industry, including when mixed with HFO, gas oil and/or other liquid fuels |
> 36,4 |
35,6–37,4 |
80–96 |
80–96 |
|
Boiler using gaseous process fuels from the chemical industry, including when mixed with natural gas and/or other gaseous fuels |
39–42,5 |
38–40 |
78–95 |
78–95 |
5.1.3.
|
BAT 56. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air while limiting CO emissions to air from the combustion of process fuels from the chemical industry, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 34 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for NOX emissions to air from the combustion of 100 % process fuels from the chemical industry in boilers
As an indication, the yearly average CO emission levels for existing plants operated ≥ 1 500 h/yr and for new plants will generally be < 5–30 mg/Nm3. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.1.4.
|
BAT 57. |
In order to reduce SOX, HCl and HF emissions to air from the combustion of process fuels from the chemical industry in boilers, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 35 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for SO2 emissions to air from the combustion of 100 % process fuels from the chemical industry in boilers
Table 36 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for HCl and HF emissions to air from the combustion of process fuels from the chemical industry in boilers
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.1.5.
|
BAT 58. |
In order to reduce emissions to air of dust, particulate-bound metals, and trace species from the combustion of process fuels from the chemical industry in boilers, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 37 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for dust emissions to air from the combustion of mixtures of gases and liquids composed of 100 % process fuels from the chemical industry in boilers
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.1.6.
|
BAT 59. |
In order to reduce emissions to air of volatile organic compounds and polychlorinated dibenzo-dioxins and -furans from the combustion of process fuels from the chemical industry in boilers, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given in BAT 6 and below.
Table 38 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for PCDD/F and TVOC emissions to air from the combustion of 100 % process fuels from the chemical industry in boilers
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR THE CO-INCINERATION OF WASTE
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section are generally applicable to the co-incineration of waste in combustion plants. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1.
When waste is co-incinerated, the BAT-AELs in this section apply to the entire flue-gas volume generated.
In addition, when waste is co-incinerated together with the fuels covered by Section 2, the BAT-AELs set out in Section 2 also apply (i) to the entire flue-gas volume generated, and (ii) to the flue-gas volume resulting from the combustion of the fuels covered by that section using the mixing rule formula of Annex VI (part 4) to Directive 2010/75/EU, in which the BAT-AELs for the flue-gas volume resulting from the combustion of waste are to be determined on the basis of BAT 61.
6.1.1.
|
BAT 60. |
In order to improve the general environmental performance of the co-incineration of waste in combustion plants, to ensure stable combustion conditions, and to reduce emissions to air, BAT is to use technique BAT 60 (a) below and a combination of the techniques given in BAT 6 and/or the other techniques below.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT 61. |
In order to prevent increased emissions from the co-incineration of waste in combustion plants, BAT is to take appropriate measures to ensure that the emissions of polluting substances in the part of the flue-gases resulting from waste co-incineration are not higher than those resulting from the application of BAT conclusions for the incineration of waste. |
|
BAT 62. |
In order to minimise the impact on residues recycling of the co-incineration of waste in combustion plants, BAT is to maintain a good quality of gypsum, ashes and slags as well as other residues, in line with the requirements set for their recycling when the plant is not co-incinerating waste, by using one or a combination of the techniques given in BAT 60 and/or by restricting the co-incineration to waste fractions with pollutant concentrations similar to those in other combusted fuels. |
6.1.2.
|
BAT 63. |
In order to increase the energy efficiency of the co-incineration of waste, BAT is to use an appropriate combination of the techniques given in BAT 12 and BAT 19, depending on the main fuel type used and on the plant configuration. The BAT-associated energy efficiency levels (BAT-AEELs) are given in Table 8 for the co-incineration of waste with biomass and/or peat and in Table 2 for the co-incineration of waste with coal and/or lignite. |
6.1.3.
|
BAT 64. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air while limiting CO and N2O emissions from the co-incineration of waste with coal and/or lignite, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given in BAT 20. |
|
BAT 65. |
In order to prevent or reduce NOX emissions to air while limiting CO and N2O emissions from the co-incineration of waste with biomass and/or peat, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given in BAT 24. |
6.1.4.
|
BAT 66. |
In order to prevent or reduce SOX, HCl and HF emissions to air from the co-incineration of waste with coal and/or lignite, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given in BAT 21. |
|
BAT 67. |
In order to prevent or reduce SOX, HCl and HF emissions to air from the co-incineration of waste with biomass and/or peat, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given in BAT 25. |
6.1.5.
|
BAT 68. |
In order to reduce dust and particulate-bound metal emissions to air from the co-incineration of waste with coal and/or lignite, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given in BAT 22. Table 39 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for metal emissions to air from the co-incineration of waste with coal and/or lignite
|
|||||||||||||||
|
BAT 69. |
In order to reduce dust and particulate-bound metal emissions to air from the co-incineration of waste with biomass and/or peat, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given in BAT 26. Table 40 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for metal emissions to air from the co-incineration of waste with biomass and/or peat
|
|||||||
6.1.6.
|
BAT 70. |
In order to reduce mercury emissions to air from the co-incineration of waste with biomass, peat, coal and/or lignite, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given in BAT 23 and BAT 27. |
6.1.7.
|
BAT 71. |
In order to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds and polychlorinated dibenzo-dioxins and -furans to air from the co-incineration of waste with biomass, peat, coal and/or lignite, BAT is to use a combination of the techniques given in BAT 6, BAT 26 and below.
Table 41 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for PCDD/F and TVOC emissions to air from the co-incineration of waste with biomass, peat, coal and/or lignite
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. BAT CONCLUSIONS FOR GASIFICATION
Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions presented in this section are generally applicable to all gasification plants directly associated to combustion plants, and to IGCC plants. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1.
7.1.1.
|
BAT 72. |
In order to increase the energy efficiency of IGCC and gasification units, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given in BAT 12 and below.
Table 42 BAT-associated energy efficiency levels (BAT-AEELs) for gasification and IGCC units
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.1.2.
|
BAT 73. |
In order to prevent and/or reduce NOX emissions to air while limiting CO emissions to air from IGCC plants, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 43 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for NOX emissions to air from IGCC plants
As an indication, the yearly average CO emission levels for existing plants operated ≥ 1 500 h/yr and for new plants will generally be < 5–30 mg/Nm3. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.1.3.
|
BAT 74. |
In order to reduce SOX emissions to air from IGCC plants, BAT is to use the technique given below.
The BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for SO2 emissions to air from IGCC plants of ≥ 100 MWth is 3–16 mg/Nm3, expressed as a yearly average. |
|||||||||
7.1.4.
|
BAT 75. |
In order to prevent or reduce dust, particulate-bound metal, ammonia and halogen emissions to air from IGCC plants, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.
Table 44 BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for dust and particulate-bound metal emissions to air from IGCC plants
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUES
8.1. General techniques
|
Technique |
Description |
|
Advanced control system |
The use of a computer-based automatic system to control the combustion efficiency and support the prevention and/or reduction of emissions. This also includes the use of high-performance monitoring. |
|
Combustion optimisation |
Measures taken to maximise the efficiency of energy conversion, e.g. in the furnace/boiler, while minimising emissions (in particular of CO). This is achieved by a combination of techniques including good design of the combustion equipment, optimisation of the temperature (e.g. efficient mixing of the fuel and combustion air) and residence time in the combustion zone, and use of an advanced control system. |
8.2. Techniques to increase energy efficiency
|
Technique |
Description |
|
Advanced control system |
See Section 8.1 |
|
CHP readiness |
The measures taken to allow the later export of a useful quantity of heat to an off-site heat load in a way that will achieve at least a 10 % reduction in primary energy usage compared to the separate generation of the heat and power produced. This includes identifying and retaining access to specific points in the steam system from which steam can be extracted, as well as making sufficient space available to allow the later fitting of items such as pipework, heat exchangers, extra water demineralisation capacity, standby boiler plant and back-pressure turbines. Balance of Plant (BoP) systems and control/instrumentation systems are suitable for upgrade. Later connection of back-pressure turbine(s) is also possible. |
|
Combined cycle |
Combination of two or more thermodynamic cycles, e.g. a Brayton cycle (gas turbine/combustion engine) with a Rankine cycle (steam turbine/boiler), to convert heat loss from the flue-gas of the first cycle to useful energy by subsequent cycle(s). |
|
Combustion optimisation |
See Section 8.1 |
|
Flue-gas condenser |
A heat exchanger where water is preheated by the flue-gas before it is heated in the steam condenser. The vapour content in the flue-gas thus condenses as it is cooled by the heating water. The flue-gas condenser is used both to increase the energy efficiency of the combustion unit and to remove pollutants such as dust, SOX, HCl, and HF from the flue-gas. |
|
Process gas management system |
A system that enables the iron and steel process gases that can be used as fuels (e.g. blast furnace, coke oven, basic oxygen furnace gases) to be directed to the combustion plants, depending on the availability of these fuels and on the type of combustion plants in an integrated steelworks. |
|
Supercritical steam conditions |
The use of a steam circuit, including steam reheating systems, in which steam can reach pressures above 220,6 bar and temperatures of > 540 °C. |
|
Ultra-supercritical steam conditions |
The use of a steam circuit, including reheat systems, in which steam can reach pressures above 250–300 bar and temperatures above 580–600 °C. |
|
Wet stack |
The design of the stack in order to enable water vapour condensation from the saturated flue-gas and thus to avoid using a flue-gas reheater after the wet FGD. |
8.3. Techniques to reduce emissions of NOX and/or CO to air
|
Technique |
Description |
|
Advanced control system |
See Section 8.1 |
|
Air staging |
The creation of several combustion zones in the combustion chamber with different oxygen contents for reducing NOX emissions and ensuring optimised combustion. The technique involves a primary combustion zone with substoichiometric firing (i.e. with deficiency of air) and a second reburn combustion zone (running with excess air) to improve combustion. Some old, small boilers may require a capacity reduction to allow the space for air staging. |
|
Combined techniques for NOX and SOX reduction |
The use of complex and integrated abatement techniques for combined reduction of NOX, SOX and, often, other pollutants from the flue-gas, e.g. activated carbon and DeSONOX processes. They can be applied either alone or in combination with other primary techniques in coal-fired PC boilers. |
|
Combustion optimisation |
See Section 8.1 |
|
Dry low-NOX burners (DLN) |
Gas turbine burners that include the premixing of the air and fuel before entering the combustion zone. By mixing air and fuel before combustion, a homogeneous temperature distribution and a lower flame temperature are achieved, resulting in lower NOX emissions. |
|
Flue-gas or exhaust-gas recirculation (FGR/EGR) |
Recirculation of part of the flue-gas to the combustion chamber to replace part of the fresh combustion air, with the dual effect of cooling the temperature and limiting the O2 content for nitrogen oxidation, thus limiting the NOX generation. It implies the supply of flue-gas from the furnace into the flame to reduce the oxygen content and therefore the temperature of the flame. The use of special burners or other provisions is based on the internal recirculation of combustion gases which cool the root of the flames and reduce the oxygen content in the hottest part of the flames. |
|
Fuel choice |
The use of fuel with a low nitrogen content. |
|
Fuel staging |
The technique is based on the reduction of the flame temperature or localised hot spots by the creation of several combustion zones in the combustion chamber with different injection levels of fuel and air. The retrofit may be less efficient in smaller plants than in larger plants. |
|
Lean-burn concept and advanced lean-burn concept |
The control of the peak flame temperature through lean-burn conditions is the primary combustion approach to limiting NOX formation in gas engines. Lean combustion decreases the fuel to air ratio in the zones where NOX is generated so that the peak flame temperature is less than the stoichiometric adiabatic flame temperature, therefore reducing thermal NOX formation. The optimisation of this concept is called the ‘advanced lean-burn concept’. |
|
Low-NOX burners (LNB) |
The technique (including ultra- or advanced low-NOX burners) is based on the principles of reducing peak flame temperatures; boiler burners are designed to delay but improve the combustion and increase the heat transfer (increased emissivity of the flame). The air/fuel mixing reduces the availability of oxygen and reduces the peak flame temperature, thus retarding the conversion of fuel-bound nitrogen to NOX and the formation of thermal NOX, while maintaining high combustion efficiency. It may be associated with a modified design of the furnace combustion chamber. The design of ultra-low-NOX burners (ULNBs) includes cmbustion staging (air/fuel) and firebox gases' recirculation (internal flue-gas recirculation). The performance of the technique may be influenced by the boiler design when retrofitting old plants. |
|
Low-NOX combustion concept in diesel engines |
The technique consists of a combination of internal engine modifications, e.g. combustion and fuel injection optimisation (the very late fuel injection timing in combination with early inlet air valve closing), turbocharging or Miller cycle. |
|
Oxidation catalysts |
The use of catalysts (that usually contain precious metals such as palladium or platinum) to oxidise carbon monoxide and unburnt hydrocarbons with oxygen to form CO2 and water vapour. |
|
Reduction of the combustion air temperature |
The use of combustion air at ambient temperature. The combustion air is not preheated in a regenerative air preheater. |
|
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) |
Selective reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia or urea in the presence of a catalyst. The technique is based on the reduction of NOX to nitrogen in a catalytic bed by reaction with ammonia (in general aqueous solution) at an optimum operating temperature of around 300–450 °C. Several layers of catalyst may be applied. A higher NOX reduction is achieved with the use of several catalyst layers. The technique design can be modular, and special catalysts and/or preheating can be used to cope with low loads or with a wide flue-gas temperature window. ‘In-duct’ or ‘slip’ SCR is a technique that combines SNCR with downstream SCR which reduces the ammonia slip from the SNCR unit. |
|
Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) |
Selective reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia or urea without a catalyst. The technique is based on the reduction of NOX to nitrogen by reaction with ammonia or urea at a high temperature. The operating temperature window is maintained between 800 °C and 1 000 °C for optimal reaction. |
|
Water/steam addition |
Water or steam is used as a diluent for reducing the combustion temperature in gas turbines, engines or boilers and thus the thermal NOX formation. It is either premixed with the fuel prior to its combustion (fuel emulsion, humidification or saturation) or directly injected in the combustion chamber (water/steam injection). |
8.4. Techniques to reduce emissions of SOX, HCl and/or HF to air
|
Technique |
Description |
|
Boiler sorbent injection (in-furnace or in-bed) |
The direct injection of a dry sorbent into the combustion chamber, or the addition of magnesium- or calcium-based adsorbents to the bed of a fluidised bed boiler. The surface of the sorbent particles reacts with the SO2 in the flue-gas or in the fluidised bed boiler. It is mostly used in combination with a dust abatement technique. |
|
Circulating fluidised bed (CFB) dry scrubber |
Flue-gas from the boiler air preheater enters the CFB absorber at the bottom and flows vertically upwards through a Venturi section where a solid sorbent and water are injected separately into the flue-gas stream. It is mostly used in combination with a dust abatement technique. |
|
Combined techniques for NOX and SOX reduction |
See Section 8.3 |
|
Duct sorbent injection (DSI) |
The injection and dispersion of a dry powder sorbent in the flue-gas stream. The sorbent (e.g. sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, hydrated lime) reacts with acid gases (e.g. the gaseous sulphur species and HCl) to form a solid which is removed with dust abatement techniques (bag filter or electrostatic precipitator). DSI is mostly used in combination with a bag filter. |
|
Flue-gas condenser |
See Section 8.2 |
|
Fuel choice |
The use of a fuel with a low sulphur, chlorine and/or fluorine content |
|
Process gas management system |
See Section 8.2 |
|
Seawater FGD |
A specific non-regenerative type of wet scrubbing using the natural alkalinity of the seawater to absorb the acidic compounds in the flue-gas. Generally requires an upstream abatement of dust. |
|
Spray dry absorber (SDA) |
A suspension/solution of an alkaline reagent is introduced and dispersed in the flue-gas stream. The material reacts with the gaseous sulphur species to form a solid which is removed with dust abatement techniques (bag filter or electrostatic precipitator). SDA is mostly used in combination with a bag filter. |
|
Wet flue-gas desulphurisation (wet FGD) |
Technique or combination of scrubbing techniques by which sulphur oxides are removed from flue-gases through various processes generally involving an alkaline sorbent for capturing gaseous SO2 and transforming it into solids. In the wet scrubbing process, gaseous compounds are dissolved in a suitable liquid (water or alkaline solution). Simultaneous removal of solid and gaseous compounds may be achieved. Downstream of the wet scrubber, the flue-gases are saturated with water and separation of the droplets is required before discharging the flue-gases. The liquid resulting from the wet scrubbing is sent to a waste water treatment plant and the insoluble matter is collected by sedimentation or filtration. |
|
Wet scrubbing |
Use of a liquid, typically water or an aqueous solution, to capture the acidic compounds from the flue-gas by absorption. |
8.5. Techniques to reduce emissions to air of dust, metals including mercury, and/or PCDD/F
|
Technique |
Description |
|
Bag filter |
Bag or fabric filters are constructed from porous woven or felted fabric through which gases are passed to remove particles. The use of a bag filter requires the selection of a fabric suitable for the characteristics of the flue-gas and the maximum operating temperature. |
|
Boiler sorbent injection (in-furnace or in-bed) |
See general description in Section 8.4. There are co-benefits in the form of dust and metal emissions reduction. |
|
Carbon sorbent (e.g. activated carbon or halogenated activated carbon) injection in the flue-gas |
Mercury and/or PCDD/F adsorption by carbon sorbents, such as (halogenated) activated carbon, with or without chemical treatment. The sorbent injection system can be enhanced by the addition of a supplementary bag filter. |
|
Dry or semi-dry FGD system |
See general description of each technique (i.e. spray dry absorber (SDA), duct sorben injection (DSI), circulating fluidised bed (CFB) dry scrubber) in Section 8.4. There are co-benefits in the form of dust and metal emissions reduction. |
|
Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) |
Electrostatic precipitators operate such that particles are charged and separated under the influence of an electrical field. Electrostatic precipitators are capable of operating under a wide range of conditions. The abatement efficiency typically depends on the number of fields, the residence time (size), catalyst properties, and upstream particle removal devices. ESPs generally include between two and five fields. The most modern (high-performance) ESPs have up to seven fields. |
|
Fuel choice |
The use of a fuel with a low ash or metals (e.g. mercury) content. |
|
Multicyclones |
Set of dust control systems, based on centrifugal force, whereby particles are separated from the carrier gas, assembled in one or several enclosures. |
|
Use of halogenated additives in the fuel or injected in the furnace |
Addition of halogen compounds (e.g. brominated additives) into the furnace to oxidise elemental mercury into soluble or particulate species, thereby enhancing mercury removal in downstream abatement systems. |
|
Wet flue-gas desulphurisation (wet FGD) |
See general description in Section 8.4. There are co-benefits in the form of dust and metals emission reduction. |
8.6. Techniques to reduce emissions to water
|
Technique |
Description |
|
Adsorption on activated carbon |
The retention of soluble pollutants on the surface of solid, highly porous particles (the adsorbent). Activated carbon is typically used for the adsorption of organic compounds and mercury. |
|
Aerobic biological treatment |
The biological oxidation of dissolved organic pollutants with oxygen using the metabolism of microorganisms. In the presence of dissolved oxygen — injected as air or pure oxygen — the organic components are mineralised into carbon dioxide and water or are transformed into other metabolites and biomass. Under certain conditions, aerobic nitrification also takes place whereby microorganisms oxidise ammonium (NH4 +) to the intermediate nitrite (NO2 –), which is then further oxidised to nitrate (NO3 –). |
|
Anoxic/anaerobic biological treatment |
The biological reduction of pollutants using the metabolism of microorganisms (e.g. nitrate (NO3 –) is reduced to elemental gaseous nitrogen, oxidised species of mercury are reduced to elemental mercury). The anoxic/anaerobic treatment of waste water from the use of wet abatement systems is typically carried out in fixed-film bioreactors using activated carbon as a carrier. The anoxic/anaerobic biological treatment for the removal of mercury is applied in combination with other techniques. |
|
Coagulation and flocculation |
Coagulation and flocculation are used to separate suspended solids from waste water and are often carried out in successive steps. Coagulation is carried out by adding coagulants with charges opposite to those of the suspended solids. Flocculation is carried out by adding polymers, so that collisions of microfloc particles cause them to bond thereby producing larger flocs. |
|
Crystallisation |
The removal of ionic pollutants from waste water by crystallising them on a seed material such as sand or minerals, in a fluidised bed process |
|
Filtration |
The separation of solids from waste water by passing it through a porous medium. It includes different types of techniques, e.g. sand filtration, microfiltration and ultrafiltration. |
|
Flotation |
The separation of solid or liquid particles from waste water by attaching them to fine gas bubbles, usually air. The buoyant particles accumulate at the water surface and are collected with skimmers. |
|
Ion exchange |
The retention of ionic pollutants from waste water and their replacement by more acceptable ions using an ion exchange resin. The pollutants are temporarily retained and afterwards released into a regeneration or backwashing liquid. |
|
Neutralisation |
The adjustment of the pH of the waste water to the neutral pH level (approximately 7) by adding chemicals. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) is generally used to increase the pH whereas sulphuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl) or carbon dioxide (CO2) is generally used to decrease the pH. The precipitation of some pollutants may occur during neutralisation. |
|
Oil-water separation |
The removal of free oil from waste water by gravity separation using devices such as the American Petroleum Institute separator, a corrugated plate interceptor, or a parallel plate interceptor. Oil-water separation is normally followed by flotation, supported by coagulation/flocculation. In some cases, emulsion breaking may be needed prior to oil-water separation. |
|
Oxidation |
The conversion of pollutants by chemical oxidising agents to similar compounds that are less hazardous and/or easier to abate. In the case of waste water from the use of wet abatement systems, air may be used to oxidise sulphite (SO3 2–) to sulphate (SO4 2–). |
|
Precipitation |
The conversion of dissolved pollutants into insoluble compounds by adding chemical precipitants. The solid precipitates formed are subsequently separated by sedimentation, flotation or filtration. Typical chemicals used for metal precipitation are lime, dolomite, sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, sodium sulphide and organosulphides. Calcium salts (other than lime) are used to precipitate sulphate or fluoride. |
|
Sedimentation |
The separation of suspended solids by gravitational settling. |
|
Stripping |
The removal of purgeable pollutants (e.g. ammonia) from waste water by contact with a high flow of a gas current in order to transfer them to the gas phase. The pollutants are removed from the stripping gas in a downstream treatment and may potentially be reused. |
(*1) Commission Implementing Decision 2012/249/EU of 7 May 2012 concerning the determination of start-up and shut-down periods for the purposes of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (OJ L 123, 9.5.2012, p. 44).
(1) For any parameter where, due to sampling or analytical limitations, 30-minute measurement is inappropriate, a suitable sampling period is employed. For PCDD/F, a sampling period of 6 to 8 hours is used.
(2) In the case of CHP units, if for technical reasons the performance test cannot be carried out with the unit operated at full load for the heat supply, the test can be supplemented or substituted by a calculation using full load parameters.
(3) The continuous measurement of the water vapour content of the flue-gas is not necessary if the sampled flue-gas is dried before analysis.
(4) Generic EN standards for continuous measurements are EN 15267-1, EN 15267-2, EN 15267-3, and EN 14181. EN standards for periodic measurements are given in the table.
(5) The monitoring frequency does not apply where plant operation would be for the sole purpose of performing an emission measurement.
(6) In the case of plants with a rated thermal input of < 100 MW operated < 1 500 h/yr, the minimum monitoring frequency may be at least once every six months. For gas turbines, periodic monitoring is carried out with a combustion plant load of > 70 %. For co-incineration of waste with coal, lignite, solid biomass and/or peat, the monitoring frequency needs to also take into account Part 6 of Annex VI to the IED.
(7) In the case of use of SCR, the minimum monitoring frequency may be at least once every year, if the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable.
(8) In the case of natural-gas-fired turbines with a rated thermal input of < 100 MW operated < 1 500 h/yr, or in the case of existing OCGTs, PEMS may be used instead.
(9) PEMS may be used instead.
(10) Two sets of measurements are carried out, one with the plant operated at loads of > 70 % and the other one at loads of < 70 %.
(11) As an alternative to the continuous measurement in the case of plants combusting oil with a known sulphur content and where there is no flue-gas desulphurisation system, periodic measurements at least once every three months and/or other procedures ensuring the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality may be used to determine the SO2 emissions.
(12) In the case of process fuels from the chemical industry, the monitoring frequency may be adjusted for plants of < 100 MWth after an initial characterisation of the fuel (see BAT 5) based on an assessment of the relevance of pollutant releases (e.g. concentration in fuel, flue-gas treatment employed) in the emissions to air, but in any case at least each time that a change of the fuel characteristics may have an impact on the emissions.
(13) If the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable, periodic measurements may be carried out each time that a change of the fuel and/or waste characteristics may have an impact on the emissions, but in any case at least once every year. For co-incineration of waste with coal, lignite, solid biomass and/or peat, the monitoring frequency needs to also take into account Part 6 of Annex VI to the IED.
(14) In the case of process fuels from the chemical industry, the monitoring frequency may be adjusted after an initial characterisation of the fuel (see BAT 5) based on an assessment of the relevance of pollutant releases (e.g. concentration in fuel, flue-gas treatment employed) in the emissions to air, but in any case at least each time that a change of the fuel characteristics may have an impact on the emissions.
(15) In the case of plants with a rated thermal input of < 100 MW operated < 500 h/yr, the minimum monitoring frequency may be at least once every year. In the case of plants with a rated thermal input of < 100 MW operated between 500 h/yr and 1 500 h/yr, the monitoring frequency may be reduced to at least once every six months.
(16) If the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable, periodic measurements may be carried out each time that a change of the fuel and/or waste characteristics may have an impact on the emissions, but in any case at least once every six months.
(17) In the case of plants combusting iron and steel process gases, the minimum monitoring frequency may be at least once every six months if the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable.
(18) The list of pollutants monitored and the monitoring frequency may be adjusted after an initial characterisation of the fuel (see BAT 5) based on an assessment of the relevance of pollutant releases (e.g. concentration in fuel, flue-gas treatment employed) in the emissions to air, but in any case at least each time that a change of the fuel characteristics may have an impact on the emissions.
(19) In the case of plants operated < 1 500 h/yr, the minimum monitoring frequency may be at least once every six months.
(20) In the case of plants operated < 1 500 h/yr, the minimum monitoring frequency may be at least once every year.
(21) Continuous sampling combined with frequent analysis of time-integrated samples, e.g. by a standardised sorbent trap monitoring method, may be used as an alternative to continuous measurements.
(22) If the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable due to the low mercury content in the fuel, periodic measurements may be carried out only each time that a change of the fuel characteristics may have an impact on the emissions.
(23) The minimum monitoring frequency does not apply in the case of plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(24) Measurements are carried out with the plant operated at loads of > 70 %.
(25) In the case of process fuels from the chemical industry, monitoring is only applicable when the fuels contain chlorinated substances.
(26) TOC monitoring and COD monitoring are alternatives. TOC monitoring is the preferred option because it does not rely on the use of very toxic compounds.
(27) The list of substances/parameters characterised can be reduced to only those that can reasonably be expected to be present in the fuel(s) based on information on the raw materials and the production processes.
(28) This characterisation is carried out without prejudice of application of the waste pre-acceptance and acceptance procedure set in BAT 60(a), which may lead to the characterisation and/or checking of other substances/parameters besides those listed here.
(29) The descriptions of the techniques are given in Section 8.6
(30) Either the BAT-AEL for TOC or the BAT-AEL for COD applies. TOC is the preferred option because its monitoring does not rely on the use of very toxic compounds.
(31) This BAT-AEL applies after subtraction of the intake load.
(32) This BAT-AEL only applies to waste water from the use of wet FGD.
(33) This BAT-AEL only applies to combustion plants using calcium compounds in flue-gas treatment.
(34) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range may not apply in the case of highly saline waste water (e.g. chloride concentrations ≥ 5 g/l) due to the increased solubility of calcium sulphate.
(35) This BAT-AEL does not apply to discharges to the sea or to brackish water bodies.
(36) These BAT-AEELs do not apply in the case of units operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(37) In the case of CHP units, only one of the two BAT-AEELs ‘Net electrical efficiency’ or ‘Net total fuel utilisation’ applies, depending on the CHP unit design (i.e. either more oriented towards electricity generation or towards heat generation).
(38) The lower end of the range may correspondent to cases where the achieved energy efficiency is negatively affected (up to four percentage points) by the type of cooling system used or the geographical location of the unit.
(39) These levels may not be achievable if the potential heat demand is too low.
(40) These BAT-AEELs do not apply to plants generating only electricity.
(41) The lower ends of the BAT-AEEL ranges are achieved in the case of unfavourable climatic conditions, low-grade lignite-fired units, and/or old units (first commissioned before 1985).
(42) The higher end of the BAT-AEEL range can be achieved with high steam parameters (pressure, temperature).
(43) The achievable electrical efficiency improvement depends on the specific unit, but an increase of more than three percentage points is considered as reflecting the use of BAT for existing units, depending on the original design of the unit and on the retrofits already performed.
(44) In the case of units burning lignite with a lower heating value below 6 MJ/kg, the lower end of the BAT-AEEL range is 41,5 %.
(45) The higher end of the BAT-AEEL range may be up to 46 % in the case of units of ≥ 600 MWth using supercritical or ultra-supercritical steam conditions.
(46) The higher end of the BAT-AEEL range may be up to 44 % in the case of units of ≥ 600 MWth using supercritical or ultra-supercritical steam conditions.
(47) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(48) In the case of coal-fired PC boiler plants put into operation no later than 1 July 1987, which are operated < 1 500 h/yr and for which SCR and/or SNCR is not applicable, the higher end of the range is 340 mg/Nm3.
(49) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(50) The lower end of the range is considered achievable when using SCR.
(51) The higher end of the range is 175 mg/Nm3 for FBC boilers put into operation no later than 7 January 2014 and for lignite-fired PC boilers.
(52) The higher end of the range is 220 mg/Nm3 for FBC boilers put into operation no later than 7 January 2014 and for lignite-fired PC boilers.
(53) In the case of plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the range is 200 mg/Nm3 for plants operated ≥ 1 500 h/yr, and 220 mg/Nm3 for plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(54) The higher end of the range may be up to 140 mg/Nm3 in the case of limitations due to boiler design, and/or in the case of fluidised bed boilers not fitted with secondary abatement techniques for NOX emissions reduction.
(55) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(56) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(57) In the case of plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the upper end of the BAT-AEL range is 250 mg/Nm3.
(58) The lower end of the range can be achieved with the use of low-sulphur fuels in combination with the most advanced wet abatement system designs.
(59) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 220 mg/Nm3 in the case of plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014 and operated < 1 500 h/yr. For other existing plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 205 mg/Nm3.
(60) For circulating fluidised bed boilers, the lower end of the range can be achieved by using high-efficiency wet FGD. The higher end of the range can be achieved by using boiler in-bed sorbent injection.
(61) The lower end of these BAT-AEL ranges may be difficult to achieve in the case of plants fitted with wet FGD and a downstream gas-gas heater.
(62) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 20 mg/Nm3 in the following cases: plants combusting fuels where the average chlorine content is 1 000 mg/kg (dry) or higher; plants operated < 1 500 h/yr; FBC boilers. For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(63) In the case of plants fitted with wet FGD with a downstream gas-gas heater, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 7 mg/Nm3.
(64) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 7 mg/Nm3 in the following cases: plants fitted with wet FGD with a downstream gas-gas heater; plants operated < 1 500 h/yr; FBC boilers. For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(65) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(66) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(67) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 28 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(68) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 25 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(69) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 12 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(70) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 20 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(71) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 14 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(72) The lower end of the BAT-AEL range can be achieved with specific mercury abatement techniques.
(73) These BAT-AEELs do not apply in the case of units operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(74) In the case of CHP units, only one of the two BAT-AEELs ‘Net electrical efficiency’ or ‘Net total fuel utilisation’ applies, depending on the CHP unit design (i.e. either more oriented towards electricity generation or towards heat generation).
(75) The lower end of the range may correspond to cases where the achieved energy efficiency is negatively affected (up to four percentage points) by the type of cooling system used or the geographical location of the unit.
(76) These levels may not be achievable if the potential heat demand is too low.
(77) These BAT-AEELs do not apply to plants generating only electricity.
(78) The lower end of the range may be down to 32 % in the case of units of < 150 MWth burning high-moisture biomass fuels.
(79) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(80) For combustion plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(81) For plants burning fuels where the average potassium content is 2 000 mg/kg (dry) or higher, and/or the average sodium content is 300 mg/kg or higher, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 200 mg/Nm3.
(82) For plants burning fuels where the average potassium content is 2 000 mg/kg (dry) or higher, and/or the average sodium content is 300 mg/kg or higher, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 250 mg/Nm3.
(83) For plants burning fuels where the average potassium content is 2 000 mg/kg (dry) or higher, and/or the average sodium content is 300 mg/kg or higher, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 260 mg/Nm3.
(84) For plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014 and burning fuels where the average potassium content is 2 000 mg/kg (dry) or higher, and/or the average sodium content is 300 mg/kg or higher, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 310 mg/Nm3.
(85) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 160 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(86) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 200 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(87) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(88) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(89) For existing plants burning fuels where the average sulphur content is 0,1 wt-% (dry) or higher, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 100 mg/Nm3.
(90) For existing plants burning fuels where the average sulphur content is 0,1 wt-% (dry) or higher, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 215 mg/Nm3.
(91) For existing plants burning fuels where the average sulphur content is 0,1 wt-% (dry) or higher, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 165 mg/Nm3, or 215 mg/Nm3 if those plants have been put into operation no later than 7 January 2014 and/or are FBC boilers combusting peat.
(92) For plants burning fuels where the average chlorine content is ≥ 0,1 wt-% (dry), or for existing plants co-combusting biomass with sulphur-rich fuel (e.g. peat) or using alkali chloride-converting additives (e.g. elemental sulphur), the higher end of the BAT-AEL range for the yearly average for new plants is 15 mg/Nm3, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range for the yearly average for existing plants is 25 mg/Nm3. The daily average BAT-AEL range does not apply to these plants.
(93) The daily average BAT-AEL range does not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr. The higher end of the BAT-AEL range for the yearly average for new plants operated < 1 500 h/yr is 15 mg/Nm3.
(94) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(95) The lower end of these BAT-AEL ranges may be difficult to achieve in the case of plants fitted with wet FGD and a downstream gas-gas heater.
(96) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(97) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(98) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(99) These BAT-AEELs do not apply to units operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(100) In the case of CHP units, only one of the two BAT-AEELs ‘Net electrical efficiency’ or ‘Net total fuel utilisation’ applies, depending on the CHP unit design (i.e. either more oriented towards electricity generation or towards heat generation).
(101) These levels may not be achievable if the potential heat demand is too low.
(102) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(103) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(104) For industrial boilers and district heating plants put into operation no later than 27 November 2003, which are operated < 1 500 h/yr and for which SCR and/or SNCR is not applicable, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 450 mg/Nm3.
(105) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 110 mg/Nm3 for plants of 100–300 MWth and plants of ≥ 300 MWth that were put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(106) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 145 mg/Nm3 for plants of 100–300 MWth and plants of ≥ 300 MWth that were put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(107) For industrial boilers and district heating plants of > 100 MWth put into operation no later than 27 November 2003, which are operated < 1 500 h/yr and for which SCR and/or SNCR is not applicable, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 365 mg/Nm3.
(108) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(109) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(110) For industrial boilers and district heating plants put into operation no later than 27 November 2003 and operated < 1 500 h/yr, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 400 mg/Nm3.
(111) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 175 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(112) For industrial boilers and district heating plants put into operation no later than 27 November 2003, which are operated < 1 500 h/yr and for which wet FGD is not applicable, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 200 mg/Nm3.
(113) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(114) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(115) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 25 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(116) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 15 mg/Nm3 for plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014.
(117) As defined in point 26 of Article 2 of Directive 2009/72/EC.
(118) As defined in point 27 of Article 2 of Directive 2009/72/EC.
(119) These BAT-AEELs do not apply to units operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(120) Net electrical efficiency BAT-AEELs apply to CHP units whose design is oriented towards power generation, and to units generating only power.
(121) These levels may be difficult to achieve in the case of engines fitted with energy-intensive secondary abatement techniques.
(122) This level may be difficult to achieve in the case of engines using a radiator as a cooling system in dry, hot geographical locations.
(123) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr or to plants that cannot be fitted with secondary abatement techniques.
(124) The BAT-AEL range is 1 150–1 900 mg/Nm3 for plants operated < 1 500 h/yr and for plants that cannot be fitted with secondary abatement techniques.
(125) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(126) For plants including units of < 20 MWth combusting HFO, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range applying to those units is 225 mg/Nm3.
(127) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(128) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(129) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 280 mg/Nm3 if no secondary abatement technique can be applied. This corresponds to a sulphur content of the fuel of 0,5 wt-% (dry).
(130) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(131) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(132) These BAT-AEELs do not apply to units operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(133) Net electrical efficiency BAT-AEELs apply to CHP units whose design is oriented towards power generation, and to units generating only power.
(134) These BAT-AELs do not apply to existing plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(135) For existing plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(136) These BAT-AEELs do not apply to units operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(137) In the case of CHP units, only one of the two BAT-AEELs ‘Net electrical efficiency’ or ‘Net total fuel utilisation’ applies, depending on the CHP unit design (i.e. either more oriented towards electricity generation or heat generation).
(138) Net total fuel utilisation BAT-AEELs may not be achievable if the potential heat demand is too low.
(139) These BAT-AEELs do not apply to plants generating only electricity.
(140) These BAT-AEELs apply to units used for mechanical drive applications.
(141) These levels may be difficult to achieve in the case of engines tuned in order to reach NOX levels lower than 190 mg/Nm3.
(142) These BAT-AELs also apply to the combustion of natural gas in dual-fuel-fired turbines.
(143) In the case of a gas turbine equipped with DLN, these BAT-AELs apply only when the DLN operation is effective.
(144) These BAT-AELs do not apply to existing plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(145) Optimising the functioning of an existing technique to reduce NOX emissions further may lead to levels of CO emissions at the higher end of the indicative range for CO emissions given after this table.
(146) These BAT-AELs do not apply to existing turbines for mechanical drive applications or to plants operated < 500 h/yr.
(147) For plants with a net electrical efficiency (EE) greater than 39 %, a correction factor may be applied to the higher end of the range, corresponding to [higher end] × EE/39, where EE is the net electrical energy efficiency or net mechanical energy efficiency of the plant determined at ISO baseload conditions.
(148) The higher end of the range is 80 mg/Nm3 in the case of plants which were put into operation no later than 27 November 2003 and are operated between 500 h/yr and 1 500 h/yr.
(149) For plants with a net electrical efficiency (EE) greater than 55 %, a correction factor may be applied to the higher end of the BAT-AEL range, corresponding to [higher end] × EE/55, where EE is the net electrical efficiency of the plant determined at ISO baseload conditions.
(150) For existing plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 65 mg/Nm3.
(151) For existing plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 55 mg/Nm3.
(152) For existing plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 80 mg/Nm3.
(153) The lower end of the BAT-AEL range for NOX can be achieved with DLN burners.
(154) These levels are indicative.
(155) For existing plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 60 mg/Nm3.
(156) For existing plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 65 mg/Nm3.
(157) Optimising the functioning of an existing technique to reduce NOX emissions further may lead to levels of CO emissions at the higher end of the indicative range for CO emissions given after this table.
(158) These BAT-AELs do not apply to plants operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(159) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(160) These BAT-AELs only apply to spark-ignited and dual-fuel engines. They do not apply to gas-diesel engines.
(161) In the case of engines for emergency use operated < 500 h/yr that could not apply the lean-burn concept or use SCR, the higher end of the indicative range is 175 mg/Nm3.
(162) For existing plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(163) This BAT-AEL is expressed as C at full load operation.
(164) These BAT-AEELs do not apply in the case of units operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(165) In the case of CHP units, only one of the two BAT-AEELs ‘Net electrical efficiency’ or ‘Net total fuel utilisation’ applies, depending on the CHP unit design (i.e. either more oriented towards electricity generation or towards heat generation).
(166) These BAT-AEELs do not apply to plants generating only electricity.
(167) The wide range of energy efficiencies in CHP units is largely dependent on the local demand for electricity and heat.
(168) These BAT-AEELs do not apply in the case of units operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(169) In the case of CHP units, only one of the two BAT-AEELs ‘Net electrical efficiency’ or ‘Net total fuel utilisation’ applies, depending on the CHP unit design (i.e. either more oriented towards electricity generation or towards heat generation).
(170) These BAT-AEELs do not apply to plants generating only electricity.
(171) Plants combusting a mixture of gases with an equivalent LHV of > 20 MJ/Nm3 are expected to emit at the higher end of the BAT-AEL ranges.
(172) The lower end of the BAT-AEL range can be achieved when using SCR.
(173) For plants operated < 1 500 h/yr, these BAT AELs do not apply.
(174) In the case of plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 160 mg/Nm3. Furthermore, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range may be exceeded when SCR cannot be used and when using a high share of COG (e.g. > 50 %) and/or when combusting COG with a relatively high level of H2. In this case, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 220 mg/Nm3.
(175) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(176) In the case of plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 70 mg/Nm3.
(177) For existing plants operated < 1 500 h/yr, these BAT AELs do not apply.
(178) For existing plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(179) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range may be exceeded when using a high share of COG (e.g. > 50 %). In this case, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 300 mg/Nm3.
(180) For existing plants operated < 1 500 h/yr, these BAT-AELs do not apply.
(181) For existing plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative
(182) These BAT-AELs are based on > 70 % of baseload power available on the day.
(183) This includes single fuel and dual fuel gas turbines.
(184) The higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 250 mg/Nm3 if DLN burners are not applicable.
(185) The lower end of the BAT-AEL range can be achieved with DLN burners.
(186) These BAT-AEELs do not apply to units operated < 1 500 h/yr.
(187) In the case of CHP units, only one of the two BAT-AEELs ‘Net electrical efficiency’ or ‘Net total fuel utilisation’ applies, depending on the CHP unit design (i.e. either more oriented towards generation electricity or towards heat generation).
(188) These BAT-AEELs may not be achievable if the potential heat demand is too low.
(189) These BAT-AEELs do not apply to plants generating only electricity.
(190) For plants operated < 1 500 h/yr, these BAT AELs do not apply.
(191) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(192) For existing plants of ≤ 500 MWth put into operation no later than 27 November 2003 using liquid fuels with a nitrogen content higher than 0,6 wt-%, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 380 mg/Nm3.
(193) For existing plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 180 mg/Nm3.
(194) For existing plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 210 mg/Nm3.
(195) For existing plants operated < 1 500 h/yr, these BAT-AELs do not apply.
(196) For existing plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(197) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(198) In the case of plants operated < 1 500 h/yr, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 20 mg/Nm3.
(199) In the case of plants operated < 1 500 h/yr, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 7 mg/Nm3.
(200) For plants operated < 1 500 h/yr, these BAT-AELs do not apply.
(201) For plants operated < 500 h/yr, these levels are indicative.
(202) For plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 25 mg/Nm3.
(203) For plants put into operation no later than 7 January 2014, the higher end of the BAT-AEL range is 15 mg/Nm3.
(204) These BAT-AELs only apply to plants using fuels derived from chemical processes involving chlorinated substances.