Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TJ0651

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.
Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.
Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Commission correspondence concerning the quantity and delivery timings of BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines – Action for annulment – Express decisions adopted after implied refusal of access – No lis pendens on account of the inadmissibility of another action – Total and partial refusal of access – Exceptions relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual, the protection of legal advice, the protection of the decision-making process and the protection of the commercial interests of a third party.
Case T-651/21.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:526

 Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 September 2022 –
Saure v Commission

(Case T‑651/21) ( 1 )

(Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Commission correspondence concerning the quantity and delivery timings of BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines – Action for annulment – Express decisions adopted after implied refusal of access – No lis pendens on account of the inadmissibility of another action – Total and partial refusal of access – Exceptions relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual, the protection of legal advice, the protection of the decision-making process and the protection of the commercial interests of a third party)

1. 

Judicial proceedings – Admissibility of actions – Objection of lis pendens – Same parties, subject matter and submissions in two actions – Form of order sought identical to that of an action declared inadmissible – Cessation of lis alibi pendens – Admissibility

(Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 86)

(see paragraphs 20-23)

2. 

EU institutions – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents – Protection of privacy and integrity of the individual – Applicability of all of the provisions of Regulation 2018/1725 – Obligation on the applicant to demonstrate the need to communicate the personal data in question – Obligation on the institution to verify of its own motion whether the legitimate interests of the person concerned have been prejudiced

(European Parliament and Council Regulations No 1049/2001, Art. 4(1)(b), and 2018/1725, Arts 3(1), 5 and 9(1)(a) and (b))

(see paragraphs 31-37)

3. 

EU institutions – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation 2018/1725 – Request for access to personal data – Obligation to establish the need to transfer those data – Scope – Public interest in disclosure of the data – Invocation of justifications related to the safeguarding of national security and public safety – Invocation of the principle of transparency – Need to put forward particular considerations in relation to the case

(European Parliament and Council Regulations No 1049/2001, recital 2 and Art. 4(1)(b), and 2018/1725, recital 28 and Art. 9(1)(b))

(see paragraphs 41, 42, 45-51)

4. 

EU institutions – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents – Protection of legal advice – Scope – Refusal to disclose opinions of the Commission’s Legal Service containing draft contract terms relating to negotiations with producers of COVID-19 vaccines – Overriding public interest in disclosure – None

(European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, recitals 2 and 6 and Art. 4(2), second indent, and (7))

(see paragraphs 58-60, 62-69)

5. 

EU institutions – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents – Protection of the decision-making process – Scope – Documents relating to ongoing negotiations for the conclusion of advance purchase agreements in respect of COVID-19 vaccines – Overriding public interest justifying the disclosure of documents – None – Time-limited application of the exception

(European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Art. 4(3), first subpara., and (7))

(see paragraphs 76-77, 84-93)

6. 

EU institutions – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents – Protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Refusal to grant access – Obligation to state reasons – Scope – Possibility of relying on general presumptions applicable to certain categories of documents

(European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Art. 4(2), first indent)

(see paragraphs 100-104, 107, 110-112)

Operative part

The Court:

1. 

Dismisses the action;

2. 

Orders Mr Hans-Wilhelm Saure to pay the costs.


( 1 ) OJ C 481, 29.11.2021.

Top