Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TJ0467

    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022.
    DBM Videovertrieb GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – European Union figurative mark Lío – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
    Case T-467/21.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:645

     Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2022 –
    DBM Videovertrieb v EUIPO – Nube (Lío)

    (Case T‑467/21) ( 1 )

    (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – European Union figurative mark Lío – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    1. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Applicant in bad faith when filing the trade mark application – Criteria for assessment – Taking into account all relevant factors at the time of filing of the application for registration – Applicant’s knowledge that a third party is using an identical or similar sign – Intention of the applicant – Origin and use of the contested sign – Commercial logic underlying the registration of the contested sign as an EU trade mark – Chronology of events leading up to the filing of the trade mark application

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 52(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 22, 23, 27, 28, 31, 41)

    2. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Applicant in bad faith when filing the trade mark application – Concept of bad faith – Scope

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 52(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 24-26)

    3. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Applicant in bad faith when filing the trade mark application – Criteria for assessment – Need to prove the existence of the likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue – Not included

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(a) and (b), (2) and (5), 52(1)(b) and 53(1)(a))

    (see paragraphs 29, 30)

    4. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Applicant in bad faith when filing the trade mark application – Burden of proof

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 52(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 32, 33)

    5. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Applicant in bad faith when filing the trade mark application – Figurative mark Lío

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 52(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 42, 50, 60, 67, 73, 80-83)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders DBM Videovertrieb GmbH to pay the costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.

    Top