This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TB0624
Case T-624/21: Order of the General Court of 22 September 2022 — Primagran v EUIPO — Primagaz (prımagran) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark prımagran — Earlier EU figurative mark PRIMA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Prohibition of reformatio in pejus — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-624/21: Order of the General Court of 22 September 2022 — Primagran v EUIPO — Primagaz (prımagran) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark prımagran — Earlier EU figurative mark PRIMA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Prohibition of reformatio in pejus — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-624/21: Order of the General Court of 22 September 2022 — Primagran v EUIPO — Primagaz (prımagran) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark prımagran — Earlier EU figurative mark PRIMA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Prohibition of reformatio in pejus — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 463, 5.12.2022, p. 46–46
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 22/09/2022
- Date lodged:
- 29/09/2021
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62021TO0624
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
5.12.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 463/46 |
Order of the General Court of 22 September 2022 — Primagran v EUIPO — Primagaz (prımagran)
(Case T-624/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark prımagran - Earlier EU figurative mark PRIMA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Prohibition of reformatio in pejus - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2022/C 463/66)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Primagran sp. z o.o. (Stegna, Poland) (represented by: E. Jaroszyńska-Kozłowska, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Compagnie des gaz de pétrole Primagaz (Paris, France) (represented by: S. Herrburger, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 July 2021 (Case R 2486/2020-4).
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Primagran sp. z o.o. shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Compagnie des gaz de pétrole Primagaz. |
