This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CO0518
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 January 2022.
FT and Others v European Commission.
Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials and Agents – Remuneration – European Commission staff assigned to a third country – Update of the correction coefficients applicable to their remuneration – Manifest errors of assessment – Retroactive effect – Recovery of undue payments – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.
Case C-518/21 P.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 January 2022.
FT and Others v European Commission.
Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials and Agents – Remuneration – European Commission staff assigned to a third country – Update of the correction coefficients applicable to their remuneration – Manifest errors of assessment – Retroactive effect – Recovery of undue payments – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.
Case C-518/21 P.
Court reports – general
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2022:70
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 January 2022 – FT and Others v Commission
(Case C‑518/21 P)
(Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials and Agents – Remuneration – European Commission staff assigned to a third country – Update of the correction coefficients applicable to their remuneration – Manifest errors of assessment – Retroactive effect – Recovery of undue payments – Appeal manifestly inadmissible)
|
1. |
Appeals – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissibility (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paras 4 [7, 8, 11], 5) |
|
2. |
Judicial proceedings – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Abstract statement – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 169) (see paras 4 [9], 5) |
|
3. |
Appeals – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the facts or evidence have been distorted (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d)) (see paras 4 [12, 13], 5) |
|
4. |
Appeals – Grounds – Plea raised for the first time in the context of the appeal – Inadmissibility (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170(1)) (see paras 4 [14-16], 5) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
FT, FU, FV, FY, FZ, GA, GB, GC, GD, GG, GE, GF, GH, GI, GJ, GK, GL, GM, GN, GO, GP, GQ, GR, GS, GT and GU shall bear their own costs. |