Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TJ0505

    Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.
    Xiuling Guo v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark sandriver – Earlier EU word mark SAND – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
    Case T-505/20.

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:655

     Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021 –
    Guo v EUIPO – Sand Cph (sandriver)

    (Case T‑505/20)

    (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark sandriver – Earlier EU word mark SAND – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    1. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b), and 53(1)(a))

    (see paras 19, 20, 23, 88)

    2. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Determination of the relevant public – Attention level of the public

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b), and 53(1)(a))

    (see para. 30)

    3. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity between the goods or services in question – Criteria for assessment

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b), and 53(1)(a))

    (see paras 36, 37)

    4. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment – Composite mark – Element common to two marks having an independent distinctive role in the later mark

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b), and 53(1)(a))

    (see paras 39, 43-45, 60, 73)

    5. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Figurative mark sandriver and word mark SAND

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b), and 53(1)(a))

    (see paras 93-97)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2020 (Case R 2019/2019-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Sand Cph and Ms Guo.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Ms Xiuling Guo to pay the costs.

    Top