Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019TA0638

    Case T-638/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Sun Stars & Sons v EUIPO — Valvis Holding (AC AQUA AC) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark AC AQUA AC — Earlier three-dimensional EU and national trade marks VODAVODA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    OJ C 252, 28.6.2021, p. 20–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    28.6.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 252/20


    Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Sun Stars & Sons v EUIPO — Valvis Holding (AC AQUA AC)

    (Case T-638/19) (1)

    (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the three-dimensional EU trade mark AC AQUA AC - Earlier three-dimensional EU and national trade marks VODAVODA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    (2021/C 252/27)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd (Singapore, Singapore) (represented by: M. Maček and C. Saettel, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Valvis Holding SA (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: D. Bogdan, G. Bozocea and M. Stănescu, lawyers)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 August 2019 (Case R 649/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Sun Stars & Sons and Valvis Holding.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Valvis Holding SA to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.


    Top