Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TJ0056

    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2019.
    Team Beverage AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark WEIN FÜR PROFIS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Misleading character — Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
    Case T-56/18.

    Court reports – general

    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2019 –
    Team Beverage v EUIPO (WEIN FÜR PROFIS)

    (Case T‑56/18)

    (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark WEIN FÜR PROFIS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Misleading character — Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    1. 

    EU trade mark — Appeals procedure — Action before the EU judicature — Jurisdiction of the General Court — Re-evaluation of the facts in the light of evidence produced for the first time before it — Not included

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 2017/1001, Art. 72)

    (see para. 16)

    2. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Aim — Need to preserve availability

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(c))

    (see para. 24)

    3. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Meaning

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(c))

    (see paras 26, 27, 30, 32)

    4. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Criteria

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(c))

    (see paras 28, 31, 35)

    5. 

    Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Pleas in law not set out in the application — General reference to documents annexed to the application — Inadmissibility

    (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 177(1)(d))

    (see para. 33)

    6. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Figurative mark WEIN FÜR PROFIS

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(c))

    (see paras 43, 48, 55, 67-73)

    7. 

    EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Overlap of the scope of the grounds set out in Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 2017/1001

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b) and (c))

    (see para. 78)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2017 (Case R 501/2017-1), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign WEIN FÜR PROFIS as an EU trade mark.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Team Beverage AG to pay the costs.

    Top