Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CO0237

    Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2018.
    Pauline Stiernon and Others v Etat belge, SPF Santé publique and Communauté française de Belgique.
    Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Freedom of movement for workers — Freedom to choose an occupation — Articles 20, 21 and 45 TFEU — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 15 — Profession of psychomotor therapist not included in the national list of allied health professions.
    Case C-237/18.

    Court reports – general

    Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2018 — Stiernon and Others

    (Case C‑237/18) ( 1 )

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Freedom of movement for workers — Freedom to choose an occupation — Articles 20, 21 and 45 TFEU — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 15 — Profession of psychomotor therapist not included in the national list of allied health professions)

    Freedom of movement for persons—Workers—Restrictions—Establishment by a Member State of a list of allied health professions—Non-inclusion on that list of the profession of psychomotor therapist, even though an undergraduate degree in psychomotor therapy has been established in that Member State—Lawfulness

    (Art. 45 TFEU)

    (see paras 27-29, operative part)

    Operative part

    Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding, in circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, legislation of a Member State establishing a list of allied health professions that does not include the profession of psychomotor therapist in that list, even though an undergraduate degree in psychomotor therapy has been established in that Member State.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.

    Top