This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TO0815
Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2018.
Správa železniční dopravní cesty, státní organizace v European Commission and Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA).
Action for annulment — Financial assistance — Project of common interest in the field of trans-European transport and energy networks — Preliminary planning services for the new Dresden-Prague high-speed rail line — Decision on eligible costs — Incorrect identification of the defendant — Not directly affected — Inadmissibility.
Case T-815/17.
Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2018.
Správa železniční dopravní cesty, státní organizace v European Commission and Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA).
Action for annulment — Financial assistance — Project of common interest in the field of trans-European transport and energy networks — Preliminary planning services for the new Dresden-Prague high-speed rail line — Decision on eligible costs — Incorrect identification of the defendant — Not directly affected — Inadmissibility.
Case T-815/17.
Court reports – general
Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2018 –
Správa železniční dopravní cesty v Commission and INEA
(Case T‑815/17)
(Action for annulment — Financial assistance — Project of common interest in the field of trans-European transport and energy networks — Preliminary planning services for the new Dresden-Prague high-speed rail line — Decision on eligible costs — Incorrect identification of the defendant — Not directly affected — Inadmissibility)
|
1. |
Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Whether directly concerned — Criteria — Decision of an executive agency of the European Union not to regard as eligible certain costs incurred in undertaking a project benefiting from European Union financial aid — Organisation entrusted with implementing the project directly affected — None (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paras 23-29, 40) |
|
2. |
Fundamental rights — Right to effective judicial protection — Limits — Compliance with the conditions governing the admissibility of an action (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47) (see para. 38) |
Re:
Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of INEA’s letter of 11 October 2017 relating to the final financial statement of the eligibility of the sums claimed from the EU financial assistance granted to the project of common interest ‘Services relating to the preliminary planning of a new Dresden-Prague high-speed rail line’.
Operative part
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene made by the Czech Republic and the Republic of Poland. |
|
3. |
Správa železniční dopravní cesty, státní organizace, shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA). |
|
4. |
Správa železniční dopravní cesty, státní organizace, the Commission, INEA, the Czech Republic and the Republic of Poland shall each bear their own costs connected with the applications for leave to intervene. |