Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016CB0496

    Case C-496/16: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen — Germany) — Execution of European arrest warrants issued against Pál Aranyosi (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Grounds for refusal to execute — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 4 — Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment — Conditions of detention in the issuing Member State — Annulment of the European arrest warrant by the issuing judicial authority — Hypothetical question — No need to adjudicate)

    OJ C 32, 29.1.2018, p. 6–6 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    29.1.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 32/6


    Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen — Germany) — Execution of European arrest warrants issued against Pál Aranyosi

    (Case C-496/16) (1)

    ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - European arrest warrant - Grounds for refusal to execute - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 4 - Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment - Conditions of detention in the issuing Member State - Annulment of the European arrest warrant by the issuing judicial authority - Hypothetical question - No need to adjudicate))

    (2018/C 032/08)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen

    Party to the main proceedings

    Pál Aranyosi

    Operative part of the order

    There is no need to proceed to judgment on the request for a preliminary ruling made by the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen (Higher Regional Court, Bremen, Germany) by decision of 12 September 2016.


    (1)  OJ C 475, 19.12.2016


    Top