Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015TJ0579

    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 November 2016.
    For Tune sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark fortune — Earlier German word mark FORTUNE-HOTELS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
    Case T-579/15.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 November 2016 —
    For Tune v EUIPO — Gastwerk Hotel Hamburg (fortune)

    (Case T‑579/15)

    (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark fortune — Earlier German word mark FORTUNE-HOTELS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    1. 

    EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark—Criteria for assessment

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 15, 16, 60, 65)

    2. 

    EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark—Assessment of the likelihood of confusion—Attention level of the public

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 17, 21)

    3. 

    EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark—Figurative mark fortune—Word mark FORTUNE-HOTELS

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 20, 25, 64-68)

    4. 

    EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Similarity of the marks concerned—Criteria for assessment—Composite mark

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 26-28, 30, 35, 36)

    5. 

    EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Relative grounds for refusal—Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services—Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark—Similarity of the marks concerned—Assessment of the distinctiveness of an element composing a trade mark

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see para. 34)

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 August 2015 (Case R 2808/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Gastwerk Hotel Hamburg and For Tune.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders For Tune sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.

    Top