This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TA0769
Case T-769/15: Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2016 — SeNaPro v EUIPO — Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke (Dolokorn) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Dolokorn — Earlier EU word mark DOLOPUR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-769/15: Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2016 — SeNaPro v EUIPO — Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke (Dolokorn) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Dolokorn — Earlier EU word mark DOLOPUR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-769/15: Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2016 — SeNaPro v EUIPO — Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke (Dolokorn) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Dolokorn — Earlier EU word mark DOLOPUR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 14, 16.1.2017, p. 32–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 24/11/2016
- Date lodged:
- 29/12/2015
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62015TJ0769
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
16.1.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 14/32 |
Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2016 — SeNaPro v EUIPO — Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke (Dolokorn)
(Case T-769/15) (1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Dolokorn - Earlier EU word mark DOLOPUR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 014/38)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: SeNaPro GmbH (Pommelsbrunn, Germany) (represented by: A. Schröder, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Strittmatter and A. Folliard–Monguiral, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke GmbH (Rottenmann, Austria) (represented by: C. Ofner, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 October 2015 (Case R 2643/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke and SeNaPro.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders SeNaPro GmbH to pay the costs. |
