Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CA0208

    Case C-208/15: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Stock ‘94 Szolgáltató Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Integrated cooperation — Grant of financing and supplies of current assets necessary for agricultural production — Single, complex supply — Distinct and independent supplies — Ancillary supply and principal supply)

    OJ C 38, 6.2.2017, p. 3–3 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.2.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 38/3


    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Stock ‘94 Szolgáltató Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága

    (Case C-208/15) (1)

    ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Integrated cooperation - Grant of financing and supplies of current assets necessary for agricultural production - Single, complex supply - Distinct and independent supplies - Ancillary supply and principal supply))

    (2017/C 038/03)

    Language of the case: Hungarian

    Referring court

    Kúria

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Stock ‘94 Szolgáltató Zrt.

    Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága

    Operative part of the judgment

    Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that:

    an integrated agricultural cooperation providing that an economic operator delivers goods to a farmer and grants him a loan intended for purchasing those goods constitutes a single transaction for the purposes of that directive, in which the supply of the goods is the principal supply. The taxable amount of that single transaction is made up of both the price of those goods and the interest paid on the loans granted to the farmers;

    the fact that an integrator may provide the farmers with additional services or buy their agricultural production has no bearing on the categorisation of the transaction at issue as a single transaction, for the purposes of Directive 2006/112.


    (1)  OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.


    Top