Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CO0253

    FTI Touristik v OHIM

    Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 December 2014 —

    FTI Touristik v OHIM

    (Case C‑253/14 P)

    ‛Appeal — Community trade mark — Marque verbale BigXtra — Absolute ground for refusal of registration — No distinctive character’

    Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 26, 27)

    Operative part

    1. 

    The appeal is dismissed.

    2. 

    FTI Touristik GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

    Top

    Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 December 2014 —

    FTI Touristik v OHIM

    (Case C‑253/14 P)

    ‛Appeal — Community trade mark — Marque verbale BigXtra — Absolute ground for refusal of registration — No distinctive character’

    Appeals — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 26, 27)

    Operative part

    1. 

    The appeal is dismissed.

    2. 

    FTI Touristik GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

    Top