(1)

Pursuant to Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, assessment and verification of constancy of performance of construction products in relation to their essential characteristics is to be carried out in accordance with the systems set out in Annex V to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011.

(2)

Annex V should be adapted in order to respond to technological progress, to make provision for the specific case of products for which European Technical Assessments have been issued, as well as to enhance the clarity, accuracy and consistency to the descriptions and terms used therein, in line with practical experience gained in the course of the application of Annex V.

(3)

This adaptation would facilitate the work of manufacturers and notified bodies authorised to carry out third-party tasks in the process of assessment and verification of constancy of performance of construction products, reduce administrative burden and increase clarity on the interpretation of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, thus having a favourable impact on the competitiveness of the construction sector as a whole.

(4)

Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 implies that the manufacturer is responsible for determining the product-type for any product the manufacturer wishes to place on the market. In the same context, the underlying logic of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 does not imply the existence of product certification, but notified bodies are only responsible for assessing the performance of construction products, the constancy of which is then to be certified. This repartition of competences between manufacturer and notified bodies should be better reflected in Annex V, without entailing a shift in the responsibilities of these actors.

(5)

Since constant surveillance of factory production control by notified bodies in fact is not possible and is not carried out in practice, reference should rather be made to the continuing nature of the surveillance.

(6)

For construction products not covered or not fully covered by harmonised standards, European Technical Assessments (ETA) can be issued by a Technical Assessment Body. Pursuant to Article 2(13) of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, such an ETA already contains an assessment of the performance of the product in question in relation to its essential characteristics. Additional subsequent controls of the correctness of this assessment process would not bring about any added value, but only generate unnecessary costs for manufacturers. Enterprises have already made requests for ETAs and need legal certainty with respect to the third-party tasks to be carried out in the process of assessment and verification of constancy of performance of these construction products.

(7)

In order to better reflect the current practice the names of the types of notified bodies and the description of their respective tasks should be adjusted.

(8)

A technical adaptation is necessary concerning the term ‘noise absorption’ referred to in Section 3 of Annex V to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 to achieve a more accurate description of the essential characteristics to be assessed and more consistency with terminology used in relevant harmonised technical specifications.

(9)

In order to ensure a smooth transition for manufacturers they should have the right to continue using certificates and other documents which were issued by notified bodies in accordance with Annex V to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 before the entry into force of this Regulation,