EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TA0219
Case T-219/18: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group (Mopeds) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a moped — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Informed user — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Interpretation consistent with Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 — No use of an earlier three-dimensional national trademark not registered in the registered design — Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002 — No unauthorised use of a work protected by the copyright law of a Member State in the registered design — Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002)
Case T-219/18: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group (Mopeds) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a moped — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Informed user — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Interpretation consistent with Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 — No use of an earlier three-dimensional national trademark not registered in the registered design — Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002 — No unauthorised use of a work protected by the copyright law of a Member State in the registered design — Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002)
Case T-219/18: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group (Mopeds) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a moped — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Informed user — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Interpretation consistent with Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 — No use of an earlier three-dimensional national trademark not registered in the registered design — Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002 — No unauthorised use of a work protected by the copyright law of a Member State in the registered design — Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002)
OJ C 413, 9.12.2019, p. 47–48
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.12.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 413/47 |
Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group (Mopeds)
(Case T-219/18) (1)
(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a moped - Earlier Community design - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Different overall impression - Informed user - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Interpretation consistent with Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 - No use of an earlier three-dimensional national trademark not registered in the registered design - Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002 - No unauthorised use of a work protected by the copyright law of a Member State in the registered design - Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002)
(2019/C 413/56)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Piaggio & C. SpA (Pontedera, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci, B. La Tella and B. Lucchetti, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group Co. Ltd (Taizhou City, China) (represented by: M. Spolidoro, M. Gurrado, S. Verea and M. Balestriero, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 January 2018 (Case R 1496/2015-3), in relation to cancellation proceedings between Piaggio & C. and Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Piaggio & C. SpA to pay the costs |