EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CN0182

Case C-182/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 26 February 2019 — Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue andCustoms

OJ C 172, 20.5.2019, p. 18–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

20.5.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/18


Reference for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 26 February 2019 — Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

(Case C-182/19)

(2019/C 172/21)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Ltd

Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Question referred

Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1140 (1) of 8 July 2016, concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature invalid in so far as it classifies under CN code 3824,specifically 38249096, products which:

i.

are composed of a bandage-like material, containing ‘heat cells’ including chemicals;

ii.

operate in similar fashion to a poultice, though providing additional benefits;

iii.

through an exothermic chemical reaction relieve pain, decrease stiffness and promote tissue healing (as verified in multiple clinical trials);

iv.

are put in forms or packings for retail sale, and

v.

are explicitly presented and marketed as being for medical purposes and as producing the effects identified in (iii) above,

on the basis of the chemicals being the material or component which gives them their essential character and not under heading 3005 (on the basis of the wording of the relevant headings, section or chapter notes, and explanatory notes under General Rule of Interpretation 1, the operation of General Rule of Interpretation 3(a) requiring classification in accordance with the most specific description, or otherwise)?


(1)  OJ 2016, L 189, p. 1.


Top