EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0427
Case T-427/18: Action brought on 10 July 2018 — Geske v EUIPO (SATISFYERMEN)
Case T-427/18: Action brought on 10 July 2018 — Geske v EUIPO (SATISFYERMEN)
Case T-427/18: Action brought on 10 July 2018 — Geske v EUIPO (SATISFYERMEN)
OJ C 301, 27.8.2018, p. 44–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.8.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 301/44 |
Action brought on 10 July 2018 — Geske v EUIPO (SATISFYERMEN)
(Case T-427/18)
(2018/C 301/59)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: André Geske (Lübbecke, Germany) (represented by: R. Albrecht, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Mark at issue: EU figurative mark SATISFYERMEN — Application No 16 886 541
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 May 2018 in Case R 2603/2017-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. |