EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0250
Case T-250/18: Action brought on 23 April 2018 — RATP v Commission
Case T-250/18: Action brought on 23 April 2018 — RATP v Commission
Case T-250/18: Action brought on 23 April 2018 — RATP v Commission
OJ C 231, 2.7.2018, p. 32–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case T-250/18: Action brought on 23 April 2018 — RATP v Commission
Action brought on 23 April 2018 — RATP v Commission
(Case T-250/18)
2018/C 231/41Language of the case: FrenchParties
Applicant: Régie autonome des transports parisiens (RATP) (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Morgan de Rivery, P. Delelis and C. Lavin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the Commission decision of 21 March 2018 granting partial access to documents pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; |
|
— |
in any event, order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(2), third indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43). |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(2), third indent, of Regulation No 1049/2001. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(2), first indent, of Regulation No 1049/2001, Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 339 TFEU. |
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons. |