EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TB0153

Case T-153/16: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2017 — Acerga v Council (Action for annulment — Fisheries — Conservation of fisheries resources — Fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters — Association — No individual concern — Act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)

OJ C 112, 10.4.2017, p. 36–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

10.4.2017   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/36


Order of the General Court of 10 February 2017 — Acerga v Council

(Case T-153/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Fisheries - Conservation of fisheries resources - Fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters - Association - No individual concern - Act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 112/50)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Asociación de armadores de cerco de Galicia (Acerga) (Sada, Spain) (represented by: B. Huarte Melgar, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Westerhof Löfflerová and F. Florindo Gijón, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment in part of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/72 of 22 January 2016 fixing for 2016 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and amending Regulation (EU) 2015/104 (OJ 2016 L 22, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission.

3.

Asociación de armadores de cerco de Galicia (Acerga) shall pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 200, 6.6.2016.


Top