EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CN0401
Case C-401/16 P: Appeal brought on 15 July 2016 by Market Watch Franchise & Consulting Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 13 May 2016 in Case T-62/15: Market Watch v EUIPO — El CORTE INGLÉS (MITOCHRON)
Case C-401/16 P: Appeal brought on 15 July 2016 by Market Watch Franchise & Consulting Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 13 May 2016 in Case T-62/15: Market Watch v EUIPO — El CORTE INGLÉS (MITOCHRON)
Case C-401/16 P: Appeal brought on 15 July 2016 by Market Watch Franchise & Consulting Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 13 May 2016 in Case T-62/15: Market Watch v EUIPO — El CORTE INGLÉS (MITOCHRON)
OJ C 95, 27.3.2017, p. 2–3
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.3.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 95/2 |
Appeal brought on 15 July 2016 by Market Watch Franchise & Consulting Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 13 May 2016 in Case T-62/15: Market Watch v EUIPO — El CORTE INGLÉS (MITOCHRON)
(Case C-401/16 P)
(2017/C 095/04)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Market Watch Franchise & Consulting Inc. (represented by: J. Korab, Rechtsanwalt)
Other party: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 1 December 2016 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.