Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62014TN0789

Case T-789/14: Action brought on 28 November 2014 — Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen v OHIM — Meissen Keramik (MEISSEN)

OJ C 127, 20.4.2015, p. 29–30 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

20.4.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/29

Action brought on 28 November 2014 — Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen v OHIM — Meissen Keramik (MEISSEN)

(Case T-789/14)

(2015/C 127/41)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen GmbH (Meißen, Germany) (represented by: O. Spuhler and M. Geitz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Meissen Keramik GmbH (Meißen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘MEISSEN’ — Application No 9 413 527

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2014 in Cases R 1182/2013-4 and R 1245/2013-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Top