Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62013FB0075

Case F-75/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 February 2014 — Probst v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Expatriation allowance — Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Request for re-examination — Material new facts — Action manifestly inadmissible)

OJ C 421, 24.11.2014, p. 56–57 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

24.11.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/56

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 February 2014 — Probst v Commission

(Case F-75/13) (1)

((Staff cases - Officials - Expatriation allowance - Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Request for re-examination - Material new facts - Action manifestly inadmissible))

2014/C 421/80

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Norbert Probst (Genval, Belgium) (represented by: initially, D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, and subsequently by D. Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to grant the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance.

Operative part of the order

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2.

Mr Probst shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(1)  OJ C 274 of 21/09/2013, p. 34.

Top