EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TN0701
Case T-701/13: Action brought on 30 December 2013 — Asociación Española de Banca v Commission
Case T-701/13: Action brought on 30 December 2013 — Asociación Española de Banca v Commission
Case T-701/13: Action brought on 30 December 2013 — Asociación Española de Banca v Commission
OJ C 52, 22.2.2014, p. 46–46
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.2.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 52/46 |
Action brought on 30 December 2013 — Asociación Española de Banca v Commission
(Case T-701/13)
2014/C 52/88
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Asociación Española de Banca (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to the decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State Aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
|
— |
in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery; |
|
— |
in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid; |
|
— |
annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of the private contracts between the investors and other entities; and |
|
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are those put forward in Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission.