EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TB0243
Case T-243/10: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Rungis express AG v OHIM — Žito (MARESTO) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-243/10: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Rungis express AG v OHIM — Žito (MARESTO) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-243/10: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Rungis express AG v OHIM — Žito (MARESTO) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 336, 16.11.2013, p. 21–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 336, 16.11.2013, p. 20–20
(HR)
16.11.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 336/21 |
Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Rungis express AG v OHIM — Žito (MARESTO)
(Case T-243/10) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 336/42
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Rungis express AG (Meckenheim, Germany) (represented: initially by U. Feldmann and subsequently by O. Dimopoulou, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, R. Pethke and D. Botis, agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Žito prehrambena industrija d.d. (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: M. Praviček, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 March 2010 (Case R 691/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Žito prehrambena industrija d.d. and Rungis express AG.
Operative part of the order
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
2. |
The applicant and the intervener are ordered to bear their own costs and, each of them, to bear half of the defendant’s costs. |