EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TB0243

Case T-243/10: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Rungis express AG v OHIM — Žito (MARESTO) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)

OJ C 336, 16.11.2013, p. 21–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 336, 16.11.2013, p. 20–20 (HR)

16.11.2013   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/21


Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Rungis express AG v OHIM — Žito (MARESTO)

(Case T-243/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 336/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Rungis express AG (Meckenheim, Germany) (represented: initially by U. Feldmann and subsequently by O. Dimopoulou, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, R. Pethke and D. Botis, agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Žito prehrambena industrija d.d. (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: M. Praviček, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 March 2010 (Case R 691/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Žito prehrambena industrija d.d. and Rungis express AG.

Operative part of the order

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2.

The applicant and the intervener are ordered to bear their own costs and, each of them, to bear half of the defendant’s costs.


(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.


Top