EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TA0415

Case T-415/10: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2013 — Nexans France v Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy (Public supply contracts — Euratom — Public procurement procedure of the Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy — Supply of electrical equipment — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Open procedure — Bid containing reservations — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectation — Proportionality — Conflict of interests — Awarding decision — Action for annulment — Not directly concerned — Inadmissibility — Non-contractual liability)

OJ C 129, 4.5.2013, p. 16–16 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

4.5.2013   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/16


Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2013 — Nexans France v Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy

(Case T-415/10) (1)

(Public supply contracts - Euratom - Public procurement procedure of the Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy - Supply of electrical equipment - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Open procedure - Bid containing reservations - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectation - Proportionality - Conflict of interests - Awarding decision - Action for annulment - Not directly concerned - Inadmissibility - Non-contractual liability)

2013/C 129/30

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Nexans France (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-P. Tran Thiet, J.-F. Le Corre and M. Pigeat, lawyers)

Defendant: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Verpont, acting as Agent, and C. Kennedy-Loest, T. Christopher, Solicitors, J. Derenne, N. Pourbaix, lawyers, and M. Farley, Solicitor)

Re:

Firstly, annulment of the decision rejecting the bid submitted by the applicant and the decision to award the contract to another tenderer and, secondly, a claim for compensation.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Nexans France to pay the costs, including those of the interim proceedings.


(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.


Top