Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62010TN0295

Case T-295/10: Action brought on 7 July 2010 — Camara v Council

OJ C 234, 28.8.2010, p. 51–52 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

28.8.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/51

Action brought on 7 July 2010 — Camara v Council

(Case T-295/10)

()

2010/C 234/91

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Kerfalla Person Camara (represented by: J.-C. Tchikaya, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

—

Annul Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing certain specific restrictive measures in respect of the Republic of Guinea, in so far as it concerns the applicant;

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing certain specific restrictive measures in respect of the Republic of Guinea (1) in so far as the applicant is included on the list of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies whose funds and economic resources are frozen under Article 6 of that regulation.

In support of his action, the applicant raises three pleas in law alleging:

—

a manifest error of assessment in including the applicant on the list of natural or legal persons entities or bodies whose funds and economic resources are frozen;

—

an infringement of Article 215(3) TFEU since the contested regulation does not contain any legal guarantees, in particular procedural guarantees;

—

an infringement of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in so far as the contested regulation infringes, (i) the principle of non-discrimination by maintaining the applicant's name on the list of persons sanctioned because of social background, (ii) his rights of defence in that it does not provide for any procedure to inform the applicant of the evidence against him, (iii) the right to an effective judicial remedy in that the Council did not inform the applicant of his rights of appeal, and (iv) the applicant's right to property.

(1)  OJ 2009 L 346, p. 26.

Top