EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007CA0302
Case C-302/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the VAT and Duties Tribunal, London (United Kingdom)) — J D Wetherspoon plc v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (First and Sixth VAT Directives — Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality — Rules on rounding of amounts of VAT — Methods and levels of rounding)
Case C-302/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the VAT and Duties Tribunal, London (United Kingdom)) — J D Wetherspoon plc v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (First and Sixth VAT Directives — Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality — Rules on rounding of amounts of VAT — Methods and levels of rounding)
Case C-302/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the VAT and Duties Tribunal, London (United Kingdom)) — J D Wetherspoon plc v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (First and Sixth VAT Directives — Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality — Rules on rounding of amounts of VAT — Methods and levels of rounding)
OJ C 102, 1.5.2009, p. 5–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
1.5.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 102/5 |
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the VAT and Duties Tribunal, London (United Kingdom)) — J D Wetherspoon plc v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
(Case C-302/07) (1)
(First and Sixth VAT Directives - Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality - Rules on rounding of amounts of VAT - Methods and levels of rounding)
2009/C 102/06
Language of the case: English
Referring court
VAT and Duties Tribunal, London
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: J D Wetherspoon plc
Defendant: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — VAT and Duties Tribunal, London –Interpretation of Articles 11A(1)(a), 12(3)(a) and 22(3)(b) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) and the first and second paragraphs of Article 2 of First Council Directive 67/227/EEC of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes (OJ, English Special Edition 1967, p. 14) — Rules on the rounding of VAT amounts.
Operative part of the judgment
|
1. |
Community law, as it currently stands, contains no specific requirement concerning the method of rounding amounts of value added tax. In the absence of specific Community legislation, it is for Member States to decide on the rules and methods for rounding amounts of value added tax, although those States must, when so deciding, observe the principles underpinning the common system of that tax, particularly the principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality. In particular, Community law, first, does not preclude the application of a national rule which requires an amount of value added tax to be rounded up whenever the fraction of the smallest unit of currency concerned is at or above 0.50, and, second, does not require that taxable persons be allowed to round down any amount of value added tax which includes a fraction of the smallest unit of national currency. |
|
2. |
In a sale at a price inclusive of value added tax, in the absence of specific Community legislation, each Member State is obliged to determine, within the limits of Community law, in particular in compliance with the principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality, the level at which the rounding of an amount of value added tax which includes a fraction of the smallest unit of national currency may or must occur. |
|
3. |
In view of the fact that traders who calculate the price of their sales of goods and services inclusive of value added tax are in a different situation to those effecting that same type of transactions at prices exclusive of value added tax, the former cannot invoke the principle of fiscal neutrality in order to claim the right also to round down, at line level and basket level, the amounts of value added tax due. |