EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006CA0487

Case C-487/06 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 December 2008 — British Aggregates Association v Commission of the European Communities, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Appeal — State aid — Environmental levy on aggregates in the United Kingdom)

OJ C 44, 21.2.2009, p. 4–5 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

21.2.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/4


Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 December 2008 — British Aggregates Association v Commission of the European Communities, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-487/06 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Environmental levy on aggregates in the United Kingdom)

(2009/C 44/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: British Aggregates Association (represented by: C. Pouncey, Solicitor, and L. Van den Hende, advocaat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Flett, B. Martenczuk and T. Scharf, Agents); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: T. Harris, M. Hall and G. Facenna, Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 September 2006 in Case T-210/02 British Aggregates Association v Commission, by which the Court of First Instance rejected as unfounded an application for the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2002) 1478 final of 24 April 2002 not to raise objections to the system of levies on quarry aggregates in the United Kingdom (State aid 863/01 — United Kingdom, Aggregates Levy)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court (Third Chamber):

1.

Sets aside the judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 13 September 2006 in Case T-210/02 British Aggregates Association v Commission;

2.

Refers the case back to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities;

3.

Reserves the costs.


(1)  OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.


Top