EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/237/38
Case F-93/06: Action brought on 16 August 2006 — Dethomas v Commission
Case F-93/06: Action brought on 16 August 2006 — Dethomas v Commission
Case F-93/06: Action brought on 16 August 2006 — Dethomas v Commission
OJ C 237, 30.9.2006, p. 22–22
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
30.9.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 237/22 |
Action brought on 16 August 2006 — Dethomas v Commission
(Case F-93/06)
(2006/C 237/38)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Bruno Dethomas (Rabat, Morocco) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:
|
— |
Annul the Commission decision of 11 January 2006 appointing the applicant a probationary official of the European Communities, as Head of the Commission delegation to Morocco in the Directorate-General for External Relations, in so far as it classifies him in Grade A*14, step 2; |
|
— |
Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
While he was a member of the temporary staff in Grade A*14, step 8, the applicant applied for the post advertised in vacancy notice COM/229/04 for the recruitment of the Head of the Commission Delegation to Morocco (1). His application being successful, he was appointed a probationary official in Grade A*14, step 2.
In his application, the applicant claims that, since he was appointed an official in the same Grade immediately following his period of service as a member of the temporary staff, the Commission should have appointed him, under the third paragraph of Article 32 of the Staff Regulations, in grade A*14, step 8. By refusing him the benefit of that provision, the Commission made a manifest error of law.
(1) OJ C 246 A, 5.10.2004, p. 1.