ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 112

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 57
14 April 2014

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2014/C 112/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 102, 7.4.2014

1

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2014/C 112/02

Case C-656/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2014 — United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union (Coordination of social security systems — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Council decision — Choice of legal basis — Article 48 TFEU — Article 79(2)(b) TFEU)

2

2014/C 112/03

Case C-82/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (Spain)) — Transportes Jordi Besora SL v Generalitat de Catalunya (Indirect taxes — Excise duties — Directive 92/12/EEC — Article 3(2) — Mineral oils — Tax on retail sales — Concept of ‘specific purpose’ — Transfer of powers to the Autonomous Communities — Financing — Predetermined allocation — Health-care and environmental expenditure)

3

2014/C 112/04

Case C-132/12 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2014 — Stichting Woonpunt, Stichting Havensteder, formerly Stichting Com.wonen, Woningstichting Haag Wonen, Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Schemes for aid granted in favour of housing corporations — Compatibility decision — Commitments provided by the national authorities in order to comply with European Union law — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Action for annulment — Conditions governing admissibility — Interest in bringing proceedings — Locus standi — Beneficiaries who are individually and directly concerned — Notion of a ‘closed circle’)

3

2014/C 112/05

Case C-133/12 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2014 — Stichting Woonlinie, Stichting Allee Wonen, Woningstichting Volksbelang, Stichting WoonInvest, Stichting Woonstede v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Scheme for aid granted in favour of housing corporations — Compatibility decision — Commitments provided by the national authorities in order to comply with European Union law — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Action for annulment — Conditions governing admissibility — Interest in bringing proceedings — Locus standi — Beneficiaries who are individually and directly concerned — Notion of a ‘closed circle’)

4

2014/C 112/06

Case C-351/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Plzni — Czech Republic) — Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. (OSA) v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s. (Directive 2001/29/EC — Copyright and related rights in the information society — Definition of ‘communication to the public’ — Transmission of works in a spa establishment — Direct effect of the provisions of the directive — Articles 56 TFEU and 102 TFEU — Directive 2006/123/EC — Freedom to provide services — Competition — Exclusive right of collective management of copyright)

5

2014/C 112/07

Case C-365/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2014 — European Commission v EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG, Kingdom of Sweden, Siemens AG, ABB Ltd (Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Access to documents of the institutions — Documents relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 and Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 — Access refused — Exceptions relating to the protection of investigations, commercial interests and the decision-making process of the institutions — Obligation upon the institution concerned to carry out a specific, individual examination of the content of the documents covered by the request for access)

6

2014/C 112/08

Case C-396/12: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — A. M. van der Ham, A. H. van der Ham-Reijersen van Buuren v College van Gedeputeerde Staten van Zuid-Holland (Common agricultural policy — Financing by the EAFRD — Support for rural development — Reduction or discontinuance of payments in the event of non-compliance with the rules on cross-compliance — Concept of ‘intentional non-compliance’)

7

2014/C 112/09

Joined Cases C-454/12 and C-455/12: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Pro Med Logistik GmbH (C-454/12) v Finanzamt Dresden-Süd and Eckard Pongratz, acting as the receiver appointed to deal with the bankruptcy of Karin Oertel (C-455/12) v Finanzamt Würzburg mit Außenstelle Ochsenfurt (Request for a preliminary ruling — VAT — Sixth VAT Directive — Article 12(3) — Annex H, category 5 — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 98(1) and (2) — Annex III, point 5 — Principle of neutrality — Transport of passengers and their accompanying luggage — Legislation of a Member State applying different rates of VAT to transport by taxi and to transport by minicab)

8

2014/C 112/10

Case C-470/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Svidník — Slovakia) — Pohotovosť s.r.o. v Miroslav Vašuta (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer credit contract — Unfair terms — Directive 93/13/EEC — Enforcement of an arbitration award — Application for leave to intervene in enforcement proceedings — Consumer protection association — National legislation which does not allow such an intervention — Procedural autonomy of the Member States)

9

2014/C 112/11

Case C-571/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts — Latvia) — Greencarrier Freight Services Latvia v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Request for a preliminary ruling — Community Customs Code — Articles 70(1) and 78 — Customs declarations — Partial examination of goods — Sampling — Incorrect code — Application of the results to identical goods covered by earlier customs declarations after release — Post-release examination — Impossible to request a further examination of the goods)

10

2014/C 112/12

Case C-588/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium)) — Lyreco Belgium NV v Sophie Rogiers (Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clauses 1 and 2.4 — Part-time parental leave — Dismissal of a worker without compelling or sufficient reason — Fixed-sum protective award on account of the taking of parental leave — Method of calculating the amount of award)

11

2014/C 112/13

Case C-601/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 February 2014 — Ningbo Yonghong Fasteners Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union, European Commission and European Industrial Fasteners Institute AISBL (EIFI) (Appeal — Dumping — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Second subparagraph of Article 2(7)(c) — Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China — Market economy treatment — Time-limit for adoption of the related decision exceeded — Effect)

12

2014/C 112/14

Case C-1/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Cartier parfums — lunettes SAS, Axa Corporate Solutions assurances SA v Ziegler France SA, Montgomery Transports SARL, Inko Trade s.r.o., Jaroslav Matěja, Groupama Transport (Request for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 27(2) — Lis pendens — Article 24 — Prorogation of jurisdiction — Establishment of jurisdiction of the court first seised by reason of appearance being entered without objection by the parties or the adoption of a final judgment)

12

2014/C 112/15

Case C-32/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Nürnberg — Germany) — Petra Würker v Familienkasse Nürnberg (Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Family allowances — Articles 77 and 78 — Benefits for dependent children of pensioners and for orphans — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Family benefits — Article 67 — Family members residing in another Member State — Concept of ‘pension’ — Recipient of a pension granted, pursuant to German legislation, for bringing up children following the death of the person from whom that recipient was divorced (‘Erziehungsrente’))

13

2014/C 112/16

Case C-79/13: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Brussel (Belgium)) — Federaal agentschap voor de opvang van asielzoeker v Selver Saciri, Danijela Dordevic, Danjel Saciri, represented by Selver Saciri and Danijela Dordevic, Sanela Saciri, represented by Selver Saciri and Danijela Dordevic, Denis Saciri, represented by Selver Saciri and Danijela Dordevic, Openbaar Centrum voor Maatschappelijk Welzijn van Diest (Directive 2003/9/EC — Minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers in the Member States — Article 13(1) — Time-limits for material reception conditions — Article 13(2) — Provisions on material reception conditions — Guarantees — Article 13(5) — Setting and grant of minimum reception conditions for asylum seekers — Size of the aid granted — Article 14 — Modalities for material reception conditions — Saturation of the reception facilities — Referral to national social protection systems — Provision of the material reception conditions in the form of financial allowances)

14

2014/C 112/17

Case C-110/13: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — HaTeFo GmbH v Finanzamt Haldensleben (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Company law — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises — Types of enterprises taken into consideration in calculating staff numbers and financial amounts — Linked enterprises — Notion of ‘group of natural persons acting jointly’)

15

2014/C 112/18

Case C-422/12 P: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2014 — Industrias Alen SA de CV v The Clorox Company, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure — Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CLORALEX — Earlier national word mark CLOROX — Likelihood of confusion — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Cross-appeal — Article 176 of the Rules of Procedure — Requirement to introduce the cross-appeal by a separate document)

16

2014/C 112/19

Joined Cases C-614/12 and C-10/13: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 January 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság and the Fővárosi Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary)) — Dutka József (C-614/12) and Csilla Sajtos (C-10/13) v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (C-614/12) and Budapest Főváros VI. Ker. Önkormányzata (C-10/13) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Implementation of European Union law — Absence — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

16

2014/C 112/20

Case C-24/13: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 January 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Dél-Zempléni Nektár Leader Nonprofit kft v Vidékfejlesztési Miniszter (Agriculture — Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 — EAFRD — Requirements relating to the legal form of local action groups — Amendment of those requirements — Competence of the Member States — Limits)

17

2014/C 112/21

Case C-25/13: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 17 de Barcelona — Spain) — France Telecom España, SA v Organismo de Gestión Tributaria de la Diputación de Barcelona (Request for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/20/EC — Fee for the private use or the special right of use for the area under and on local public land imposed on operators supplying electronic communications services — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Answer able clearly to be deduced from the case-law)

18

2014/C 112/22

Case C-122/13: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 January 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Firenze — Italy) — Paola C v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (Request for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2004/80/EC — Article 12 — Compensation of victims of violent intentional crime — Purely internal situation — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

19

2014/C 112/23

Case C-193/13 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 January 2014 — nfon AG v Fon Wireless Ltd, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Figurative mark including the word element ‘nfon’ — Opposition by the proprietor of Community figurative mark including the word element ‘fon’ and of the national word mark FON — Rejection of the opposition by the Board of Appeal of OHIM)

19

2014/C 112/24

Case C-332/13: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 January 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Ferenc Weigl v Nemzeti Innovációs Hivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — No implementation of European Union law —  — Court manifestly lacking jurisdiction)

20

2014/C 112/25

Case C-430/13: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 January 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Ítélőtábla — Hungary) — Ilona Baradics and Others v QBE Insurance (Europe) Ltd Magyarországi Fióktelepe, Magyar Állam (Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Package travel, package holidays and package tours — National legislation laying down minimum percentages for the security that a travel organiser must provide in order to refund, in the event of insolvency, money paid over by consumers)

21

2014/C 112/26

Case C-651/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 9 December 2013 — Lb Group Ltd v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Others

21

2014/C 112/27

Case C-652/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari (Italy) lodged on 9 December 2013 — Criminal proceedings against Mirko Saba

22

2014/C 112/28

Case C-689/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia Amministrativa per la Regione Siciliana (Italy) lodged on 24 December 2013 — PFE v Airgest

22

2014/C 112/29

Case C-18/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 16 January 2014 — CO Sociedad de Gestion y Participación SA and Others v De Nederlandsche Bank NV, De Nederlandsche Bank NV v CO Sociedad de Gestion y Participación SA and Others

24

2014/C 112/30

Case C-27/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Duisburg (Germany) lodged on 20 January 2014 — Elfriede Stermann, Hans Gerd Stermann v Zurich Deutscher Herold Lebensversicherung AG

24

2014/C 112/31

Case C-99/14 P: Appeal brought on 28 February 2014 by Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 December 2013 in Case T-176/11: Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) v Council of the European Union

25

2014/C 112/32

Case C-477/12: Order of the President of the Court of 17 January 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht — Germany) — Hogan Lovells International LLP v Bayer CropScience K.K.

26

2014/C 112/33

Case C-259/13: Order of the President of the Court of 6 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Elena Recinto-Pfingsten v Swiss International Air Lines AG

26

General Court

2014/C 112/34

Case T-91/11: Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2014 — InnoLux v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Worldwide market for liquid crystal display (LCD) panels — Agreements and concerted practices concerning prices and production capacity — Territorial jurisdiction — Internal sales — Sales of finished products incorporating cartelised products — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — Rounding method — Unlimited jurisdiction)

27

2014/C 112/35

Case T-520/11: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2014 — Genebre v OHIM — General Electric (GE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark GE — Earlier national word mark GE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

27

2014/C 112/36

Case T-602/11: Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2014 — Pêra-Grave v OHIM — Fundação Eugénio de Almeida (QTA S. JOSÉ DE PERAMANCA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark QTA S. JOSÉ DE PERAMANCA — Earlier national figurative marks VINHO PERA-MANCA TINTO, VINHO PERA-MANCA BRANCO and PÊRA-MANCA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

28

2014/C 112/37

Case T-229/12: Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2014 — Advance Magazine Publishers v OHIM — López Cabré (VOGUE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark VOGUE — Earlier Community word mark VOGUE — Likelihood of confusion — Identity or similarity of the goods — Identity or similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Vagueness of the trade mark application — Article 26(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Rule 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Partial refusal to register)

29

2014/C 112/38

Case T-416/12: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2014 — HP Health Clubs Iberia v OHIM — Shiseido (ZENSATIONS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark ZENSATIONS — Earlier Community word mark ZEN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Admissibility of the applicant’s form of order — Article 46 of the Rules of Procedure — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Examination of the facts by the Office of its own motion — Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)

29

2014/C 112/39

Case T-25/13: Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2014 — Mäurer & Wirtz v OHIM — Sacra (4711 Aqua Mirabilis) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark 4711 Aqua Mirabilis — Earlier Community word mark AQUA ADMIRABILIS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Distinctive character of the earlier mark — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

30

2014/C 112/40

Case T-71/13: Judgment of the General Court of 6 March 2014 — Anapurna v OHIM — Annapurna (ANNAPURNA) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark ANNAPURNA — Application for annulment filed by the intervener — Article 134(1) to (3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Form of use of the trade mark — Proof of use for the registered goods)

31

2014/C 112/41

Case T-79/09: Order of the General Court of 31 January 2014 — France v Commission (State aid — Framework system of activities carried out by agricultural inter-trade organisations recognised in France in favour of the members of the represented agricultural industries — Financing by compulsory voluntary contributions — Decision classifying the aid scheme as compatible with the common market — Withdrawal of the decision — No need to adjudicate)

31

2014/C 112/42

Joined Cases T-162/11 and T-163/11: Order of the General Court of 12 February 2014 — Cofra v OHIM — O2 (can do) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

32

2014/C 112/43

Case T-87/12: Order of the General Court of 6 February 2014 — Duff Beer v OHIM — Twentieth Century Fox Film (Duff) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)

33

2014/C 112/44

Case T-470/12: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2014 — Sothys Auriac v OHIM — Grand Hotel Primavera (BEAUTY GARDEN) (Community trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Withdrawal of that application — No need to adjudicate)

33

2014/C 112/45

Case T-180/13: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2014 — Pesquerias Riveirenses and Others v Council (Action for annulment — Fisheries policy — Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 — Amalgamation of the northern and southern components of the stock of blue whiting in the north-east Atlantic in order to establish the TAC — Lack of direct concern — Manifestly inadmissible)

34

2014/C 112/46

Case T-646/13: Action brought on 25 November 2013 — Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe and Others v Commission

34

2014/C 112/47

Case T-664/13: Action brought on 10 December 2013 — Petco Animal Supplies Stores v OHIM — Gutiérrez Ariza (PETCO)

35

2014/C 112/48

Case T-673/13: Action brought on 9 December 2013 — European Coalition to End Animal Experiments v ECHA

36

2014/C 112/49

Case T-711/13: Action brought on 20 December 2013 — Harrys Pubar v OHIM — Harry’s New York Bar (HARRY’S BAR)

37

2014/C 112/50

Case T-716/13: Action brought on 27 December 2013 — Harry’s New York Bar v OHIM — Harrys Pubar (HARRY’S BAR)

38

2014/C 112/51

Case T-721/13: Action brought on 31 December 2013 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV)

39

2014/C 112/52

Case T-722/13: Action brought on 31 December 2013 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV)

39

2014/C 112/53

Case T-7/14 P: Appeal brought on 2 January 2014 by BQ against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 23 October 2013 in Case F-39/12, BQ v Court of Auditors

40

2014/C 112/54

Case T-17/14: Action brought on 8 January 2014 — U4U and Others v Parliament and Council

41

2014/C 112/55

Case T-20/14: Action brought on 8 January 2014 — Nguyen v Parliament and Council

42

2014/C 112/56

Case T-22/14: Action brought on 8 January 2014 — Bergallou v Parliament and Council

43

2014/C 112/57

Case T-23/14: Action brought on 6 January 2014 — Bos and Others v Parliament and Council

44

2014/C 112/58

Case T-40/14: Action brought on 10 January 2014 — Electrabel and Dunamenti Erőmű v Commission

45

2014/C 112/59

Case T-49/14: Action brought on 17 January 2014 — Zentralverband des Deutschen Bäckerhandwerks v Commission

46

2014/C 112/60

Case T-66/14: Action brought on 24 January 2014 — Bredenkamp and others v Council and Commission

47

2014/C 112/61

Case T-67/14: Action brought on 1 February 2014 — Viraj Profiles v Council

48

2014/C 112/62

Case T-69/14: Action brought on 27 January 2014 — UAB MELT WATER v OHIM (MELT WATER Original)

48

2014/C 112/63

Case T-70/14: Action brought on 27 January 2014 — UAB MELT WATER v OHIM (Form of a bottle)

49

2014/C 112/64

Case T-82/14: Action brought on 4 February 2014 — Copernicus-Trademarks v OHIM — Maquet (LUCEO)

50

2014/C 112/65

Case T-83/14: Action brought on 4 February 2014 — LTJ Diffusion v OHIM — Arthur et Aston (ARTHUR & ASTON).

51

2014/C 112/66

Case T-100/14: Action brought on 12 February 2014 — Tecalan v OHIM (TECALAN)

51

2014/C 112/67

Case T-101/14: Action brought on 10 February 2014 — British Aggregates v Commission

52

2014/C 112/68

Case T-102/14: Action brought on 17 February 2014 — Deutsche Post AG v OHIM

53

2014/C 112/69

Case T-103/14: Action brought on 17 February 2014 — Frucona Košice v Commission

53

2014/C 112/70

Case T-105/14: Action brought on 12 February 2014 — TrekStor v OHIM — Scanlab (iDrive)

54

2014/C 112/71

Case T-111/14: Action brought on 17 February 2014 — Unitec Bio v Council

55

2014/C 112/72

Case T-112/14: Action brought on 17 February 2014 — Molinos Río de la Plata v Council

55

2014/C 112/73

Case T-113/14: Action brought on 17 February 2014 — Oleaginosa Moreno Hermanos v Council

56

2014/C 112/74

Case T-114/14: Action brought on 17 February 2014 — Vicentin v Council

57

2014/C 112/75

Case T-115/14: Action brought on 17 February 2014 — Aceitera General Deheza v Council

58

2014/C 112/76

Case T-120/14: Action brought on 18 February 2014 — PT Ciliandra Perkasa v Council

58

2014/C 112/77

Case T-121/14: Action brought on 18 February 2014 — PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri v Council

60

2014/C 112/78

Case T-126/14: Action brought on 21 February 2014 — Netherlands v Commission

61

EN