EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0156
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 July 2003. # R.P. van der Duin v Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ANOZ Zorgverzekeringen UA and Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ANOZ Zorgverzekeringen UA v T.W. van Wegberg-van Brederode. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Centrale Raad van Beroep - Netherlands. # Social security - Pensioners and members of their family residing in a Member State other than the State liable for payment of the pension - Medical costs incurred in the Member State liable for payment of the pension - Conditions for assumption of responsibility - Competent Member State and competent institution - Articles 21, 22, 28 and 31 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71. # Case C-156/01.
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 July 2003.
R.P. van der Duin v Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ANOZ Zorgverzekeringen UA and Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ANOZ Zorgverzekeringen UA v T.W. van Wegberg-van Brederode.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Centrale Raad van Beroep - Netherlands.
Social security - Pensioners and members of their family residing in a Member State other than the State liable for payment of the pension - Medical costs incurred in the Member State liable for payment of the pension - Conditions for assumption of responsibility - Competent Member State and competent institution - Articles 21, 22, 28 and 31 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71.
Case C-156/01.
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 July 2003.
R.P. van der Duin v Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ANOZ Zorgverzekeringen UA and Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ANOZ Zorgverzekeringen UA v T.W. van Wegberg-van Brederode.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Centrale Raad van Beroep - Netherlands.
Social security - Pensioners and members of their family residing in a Member State other than the State liable for payment of the pension - Medical costs incurred in the Member State liable for payment of the pension - Conditions for assumption of responsibility - Competent Member State and competent institution - Articles 21, 22, 28 and 31 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71.
Case C-156/01.
European Court Reports 2003 I-07045
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:389
«(Social security – Pensioners and members of their family residing in a Member State other than the State liable for payment of the pension – Medical costs incurred in the Member State liable for payment of the pension – Conditions for assumption of responsibility – Competent Member State and competent institution – Articles 21, 22, 28 and 31 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Council Regulation No 1408/71, Art. 22(1)(c)(i), and Art. 28; Council Regulation No 574/72, Art. 29)
(Council Regulation No 1408/71, Art. 22(1)(c)(i) and Art. 28)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
3 July 2003 (1)
((Social security – Pensioners and members of their family residing in a Member State other than the State liable for payment of the pension – Medical costs incurred in the Member State liable for payment of the pension – Conditions for assumption of responsibility – Competent Member State and competent institution – Articles 21, 22, 28 and 31 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71))
In Case C-156/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between R.P. van der Duinand
Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ANOZ Zorgverzekeringen UA, and between Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ANOZ Zorgverzekeringen UA and T.W. van Wegberg-van Brederode, on the interpretation of Articles 21, 22(1)(c), 28 and 31 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2001/83 of 2 June 1983 (OJ 1983 L 230, p. 6),THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of Mr van der Duin, represented by F.T.I. Oey, of Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ANOZ Zorgverzekeringen UA, represented by E.G.J. Broekhuizen, acting as Agent, of the Netherlands Government, represented by C. Wissels, acting as Agent, of the Spanish Government, represented by N. Díaz Abad, of the United Kingdom Government, represented by C. Lewis, and of the Commission, represented by H.M.H. Speyart, at the hearing on 26 September 2002,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 24 October 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),
in answer to the questions referred to it by the Centrale Raad van Beroep by order of 21 March 2001, hereby rules:
Wathelet |
Timmermans |
La Pergola |
Jann |
von Bahr |
|
R. Grass |
M. Wathelet |
Registrar |
President of the Fifth Chamber |