Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024CN0412

    Case C-412/24, Fauré Le Page: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 10 June 2024 – Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS, Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v Goyard ST-Honoré SAS

    OJ C, C/2024/5306, 9.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5306/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5306/oj

    European flag

    Official Journal
    of the European Union

    EN

    C series

    C/2024/5306

    9.9.2024

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 10 June 2024 – Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS, Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v Goyard ST-Honoré SAS

    (Case C-412/24, Fauré Le Page)

    (C/2024/5306)

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Cour de cassation

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellants: Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS, Fauré Le Page Paris SAS

    Respondent: Goyard ST-Honoré SAS

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must Article 3(1)(g) of Directive 2008/95/EC (1) of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks be interpreted as meaning that a reference to a fanciful date in a trade mark conveying false information on the age, reliability and know-how of the manufacturer of the goods and, consequently, on one of the intangible characteristics of those goods is sufficient to establish the existence of actual deceit or a sufficiently serious risk that the consumer will be deceived?

    2.

    If the answer to the first question is in the negative, must that article be interpreted as meaning?

    (a)

    that a trade mark may be regarded as deceptive where there is a likelihood that consumers of the goods and services designated by the trade mark will believe that the proprietor of that trade mark has been producing those goods for centuries, thereby conferring on them a prestigious image, whereas that is not the case?

    (b)

    that, in order to establish the existence of actual deceit or a sufficiently serious risk that the consumer will be deceived, on which a finding that a trade mark is deceptive depends, the trade mark must constitute a sufficiently specific designation of potential characteristics of the goods and services for which it is registered, so that the targeted consumer is led to believe that the goods and services possess certain characteristics which they do not in fact possess?

    (1)  Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (Codified version) (OJ 2008 L 299, p. 25).

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5306/oj

    ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

    Top