EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CN0422
Case C-422/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 22 June 2022 — Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu v TE
Case C-422/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 22 June 2022 — Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu v TE
Case C-422/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 22 June 2022 — Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu v TE
OJ C 380, 3.10.2022, p. 2–3
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
3.10.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 380/2 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 22 June 2022 — Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu v TE
(Case C-422/22)
(2022/C 380/03)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Sąd Najwyższy
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu
Respondent: TE
Questions referred
1. |
Is the institution of a Member State which has issued an A1 form and which, of its own motion (without a request from the competent institution of the Member State concerned), intends to cancel/withdraw or invalidate the issued form, obliged to make arrangements with the competent institution of another Member State in accordance with rules analogous to those set out in Articles 6 and 16 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems …? (1) |
2. |
Are the arrangements to be made even before the cancellation/withdrawal or invalidation of the issued form, or is the cancellation/withdrawal or invalidation provisional in nature (Article 16(2)) and will become final in the event that the Member State institution concerned does not raise any objection or present a different view on the matter? |