Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CN0568

    Case C-568/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 16 September 2021 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid; Other parties: E. and S., also on behalf of their minor children

    OJ C 2, 3.1.2022, p. 21–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.1.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 2/21


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 16 September 2021 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid; Other parties: E. and S., also on behalf of their minor children

    (Case C-568/21)

    (2022/C 2/26)

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Raad van State

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

    Respondents: E. and S., also on behalf of their minor children

    Question referred

    Must Article 2(1) of the Dublin Regulation (1) be interpreted as meaning that a diplomatic card issued by a Member State under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations is a residence document within the meaning of that provision?


    (1)  Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31).


    Top