This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CA0132
Case C-132/21: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Articles 77 to 79 — Remedies — Parallel exercise — Relationship — Procedural autonomy — Effectiveness of the protection rules established by that regulation — Consistent and homogeneous application of those rules throughout the European Union — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
Case C-132/21: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Articles 77 to 79 — Remedies — Parallel exercise — Relationship — Procedural autonomy — Effectiveness of the protection rules established by that regulation — Consistent and homogeneous application of those rules throughout the European Union — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
Case C-132/21: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Articles 77 to 79 — Remedies — Parallel exercise — Relationship — Procedural autonomy — Effectiveness of the protection rules established by that regulation — Consistent and homogeneous application of those rules throughout the European Union — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
OJ C 71, 27.2.2023, p. 6–7
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.2.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 71/6 |
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság
(Case C-132/21) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Articles 77 to 79 - Remedies - Parallel exercise - Relationship - Procedural autonomy - Effectiveness of the protection rules established by that regulation - Consistent and homogeneous application of those rules throughout the European Union - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
(2023/C 71/06)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Fővárosi Törvényszék
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: BE
Defendant: Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság
Interested party: Budapesti Elektromos Művek Zrt
Operative part of the judgment
Article 77(1), Article 78(1) and Article 79(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
must be interpreted as permitting the remedies provided for in Article 77(1) and Article 78(1) of that regulation, on the one hand, and Article 79(1) thereof, on the other, to be exercised concurrently with and independently of each other. It is for the Member States, in accordance with the principle of procedural autonomy, to lay down detailed rules as regards the relationship between those remedies in order to ensure the effective protection of the rights guaranteed by that regulation and the consistent and homogeneous application of its provisions, as well as the right to an effective remedy before a court or tribunal as referred to in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.