This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020CN0039
Case C-39/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 27 January 2020 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Jumbocarry Trading GmbH
Case C-39/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 27 January 2020 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Jumbocarry Trading GmbH
Case C-39/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 27 January 2020 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Jumbocarry Trading GmbH
OJ C 201, 15.6.2020, p. 8–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
15.6.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 201/8 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 27 January 2020 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Jumbocarry Trading GmbH
(Case C-39/20)
(2020/C 201/13)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Hoge Raad der Nederlanden
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Defendant: Jumbocarry Trading GmbH
Questions referred
1. |
Are Articles 103(3)(b) and 124(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (1) applicable to a customs debt that was incurred before 1 May 2016 and whose period of limitation had not yet expired as of that date? |
2. |
If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, does the principle of legal certainty or the principle of legitimate expectations preclude that applicability? |
(1) Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1).