Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CN0679

Case C-679/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov (Romania) lodged on 12 September 2019 – NL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București

OJ C 423, 16.12.2019, p. 21–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

16.12.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/21


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov (Romania) lodged on 12 September 2019 – NL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București

(Case C-679/19)

(2019/C 423/27)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Ilfov

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: NL

Defendant: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București

Questions referred

1.

Is Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community (1) to be interpreted as precluding a penalty such as that laid down in Article 653(i) of Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 707/2006 (Government Decree No 707/2006), which provides that cash in excess of EUR 10 000 that has not been declared in writing to the customs authority is to be confiscated in its entirety and permanently?

2.

Is Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community to be interpreted as precluding the application by Member States of an administrative penalty consisting in the confiscation of the entire undeclared amount without any prior or subsequent verification of the provenance or destination of the amounts and regardless of their provenance and destination?


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community (OJ 2005 L 309, p. 9).


Top