Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CN0208

    Case C-208/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Graz (Austria) lodged on 4 March 2019 — NK v Ms and AS

    OJ C 172, 20.5.2019, p. 19–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    20.5.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 172/19


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Graz (Austria) lodged on 4 March 2019 — NK v Ms and AS

    (Case C-208/19)

    (2019/C 172/22)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Graz

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: NK

    Defendants: Ms and AS

    Questions referred

    1.

    Is a contract between an architect and a consumer, according to which the architect is required (only) to carry out the planning for the construction of a new single-family house, including the preparation of plans, a contract ‘for the construction of new buildings’ within the meaning of Article 3(3)(f) of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council? (1)

    2.

    If Question 1 is answered in the negative:

    Is a contract between an architect and a consumer, according to which the architect is required to carry out the planning for the construction of a new single-family house in accordance with the specifications and wishes of his clients and, in this context, is required to draw up plans, a contract for the supply of ‘goods made to the consumer’s specifications or clearly personalised’ within the meaning of Article 16(c) and Article 2(3) and (4) of Directive 2011/83?


    (1)  OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64.


    Top