This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0512
Case T-512/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — OCU and Others v SRB
Case T-512/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — OCU and Others v SRB
Case T-512/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — OCU and Others v SRB
OJ C 338, 9.10.2017, p. 17–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.10.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 338/17 |
Action brought on 7 August 2017 — OCU and Others v SRB
(Case T-512/17)
(2017/C 338/18)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicants: Organización de Consumidores y Usuarios (OCU) (Madrid, Spain) and 37 other applicants
Defendant: Single Resolution Board
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the General Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
declare that Articles 18 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 are unlawful and inapplicable; |
|
— |
order the defendant, the Single Resolution Board, to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The present action is brought against Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme regarding the Banco Popular Español, S.A.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán y Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sánchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.