Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2018.#Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark WILD PINK — Earlier EU and national word marks PINK LADY — Earlier EU figurative marks Pink Lady — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-164/17.

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2018.
Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark WILD PINK — Earlier EU and national word marks PINK LADY — Earlier EU figurative marks Pink Lady — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-164/17.

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2018.
Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark WILD PINK — Earlier EU and national word marks PINK LADY — Earlier EU figurative marks Pink Lady — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-164/17.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:678