This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017CN0270
Case C-270/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 18 May 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Tadas Tupikas
Case C-270/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 18 May 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Tadas Tupikas
Case C-270/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 18 May 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Tadas Tupikas
OJ C 277, 21.8.2017, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.8.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 277/24 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 18 May 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Tadas Tupikas
(Case C-270/17)
(2017/C 277/34)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Rechtbank Amsterdam
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie
Defendant: Tadas Tupikas
Question referred
Are appeal proceedings
|
— |
in which there has been an examination of the merits and |
|
— |
which resulted in the passing of a (new) sentence on the person concerned and/or the confirmation of the sentence handed down at first instance, |
|
— |
where the EAW [European Arrest Warrant] concerns the execution of that sentence, |
the ‘trial resulting in the decision’ as referred to in Article 4a(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA? (1)
(1) Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).