This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CN0175
Case C-175/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 29 March 2016 — Hannele Hälvä, Sari Naukkarinen, Pirjo Paajanen, Satu Piik v SOS-Lapsikylä ry
Case C-175/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 29 March 2016 — Hannele Hälvä, Sari Naukkarinen, Pirjo Paajanen, Satu Piik v SOS-Lapsikylä ry
Case C-175/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 29 March 2016 — Hannele Hälvä, Sari Naukkarinen, Pirjo Paajanen, Satu Piik v SOS-Lapsikylä ry
OJ C 191, 30.5.2016, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.5.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 191/20 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 29 March 2016 — Hannele Hälvä, Sari Naukkarinen, Pirjo Paajanen, Satu Piik v SOS-Lapsikylä ry
(Case C-175/16)
(2016/C 191/24)
Language of the case: Finnish
Referring court
Korkein oikeus
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: Hannele Hälvä, Sari Naukkarinen, Pirjo Paajanen, Satu Piik
Respondent: SOS-Lapsikylä ry
Question referred
Must Article 17(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time be interpreted as including within its scope an activity, as described above, performed in a children’s home in which the worker acts as the representative of foster parents of children in care on the parents’ days off, lives during this period with the children in a family-like setting and during this time independently attends equally to the children’s and family’s needs, as parents generally do?