Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TA0736

    Case T-736/14: Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2015 — Monster Energy v OHIM — Home Focus (MoMo Monsters) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark MoMo Monsters — Earlier Community word marks MONSTER and MONSTER ENERGY and earlier international figurative mark MONSTER ENERGY — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    OJ C 429, 21.12.2015, p. 23–23 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.12.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 429/23


    Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2015 — Monster Energy v OHIM — Home Focus (MoMo Monsters)

    (Case T-736/14) (1)

    ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark MoMo Monsters - Earlier Community word marks MONSTER and MONSTER ENERGY and earlier international figurative mark MONSTER ENERGY - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the goods - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    (2015/C 429/29)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Monster Energy Company (Corona, California, United States) (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Home Focus Development Ltd (Tortola, British Virgin Islands)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 August 2014 (Case R 1167/2013-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Monster Energy Company and Home Focus Development Ltd.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Monster Energy Company to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 448, 15.12.2014.


    Top