Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62012CN0398

    Case C-398/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Fermo (Italy) lodged on 29 August 2012 — Criminal proceedings against M

    OJ C 355, 17.11.2012, p. 9–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    17.11.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 355/9

    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Fermo (Italy) lodged on 29 August 2012 — Criminal proceedings against M

    (Case C-398/12)

    2012/C 355/15

    Language of the case: Italian

    Referring court

    Tribunale di Fermo

    Party/parties to the main proceedings

    M

    Question referred

    Does a final judgment of no case to answer given by a Member State of the European Union party to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement (CISA), (1) following an extensive preliminary investigation as part of investigations in connection with proceedings which could be re-activated in the event of fresh evidence, preclude the initiation or conduct of proceedings in respect of the same facts and the same person in another Contracting State.

    (1)  Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders; OJ 2000 L 239, p. 19.

    Top